|
|
Effect of full reflux of biogas slurry on biogas production with agricultural wastes |
CHEN Guang-yin1,2, WANG En-hui2, ZHENG Jia-wei2, WU Pei2, LIU Xu2, FANG Cai-xia1,2 |
1. Anhui Engineering Laboratory of Soil and Water Pollution Control and Remediation, Wuhu 241002, China; 2. School of Ecology and Environment, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China |
|
|
Abstract To realize the reduction of biogas slurry from the source, the feasibility of full reflux of biogas slurry for biogas production with agricultural wastes was studied at a CSTR reactor. The results showed that, the pH value and EC of the biogas slurry increased continuously, the total nitrogen (TN) content decreased to a low level (only 110mg/L on day 132) during the anaerobic mono-digestion of rice straw, and the content of total volatile fatty acids (TVFAs) accumulated gradually after day 94. Meanwhile, the daily biogas yield decreased gradually, and which was only 50% of that in the stable biogas production period on day 104. Insufficient nitrogen is an important reason for the decrease in the daily biogas yield during the anaerobic mono-digestion of rice straw with full reflux of biogas slurry. The daily biogas yield increased rapidly after nitrogen supplement and was 1.5times higher than that before nitrogen supplementation. Compared to anaerobic mono-digestion of rice straw, the stability of anaerobic co-digestion system of wheat straw and pig manure was significantly enhanced and the daily biogas yield was more stable. However, after 105days of full reflux of biogas slurry, the contents of TN and TVFAs in biogas slurry accumulated gradually while the daily biogas yield was still stable. In summary, it is feasible to conduct the full reflux of biogas slurry to the anaerobic system in the multi-material biogas plant, but attention should be paid to the accumulation of ammonium nitrogen and TVFAs.
|
Received: 03 February 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 叶小梅,常志州,钱玉婷,等.江苏省大中型沼气工程调查及沼液生物学特性研究[J].农业工程学报, 2012,28(6):222-227. Ye X M, Chang Z Z, Qian Y T, et al. Investigation on large and medium scale biogas plants and biological properties of digestate in Jiangsu province [J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2012,28(6): 222-227. [2] 张国治,吴少斌,王焕玲,等.大中型沼气工程沼渣沼液利用意愿现状调查及问题分析[J].中国沼气, 2009,28(1):21-24. Zhang G Z, Wu S B, Wang H L, et al. Survey and analysis on state quo of public intention for utilizing digestate from large and medium size biogas plants [J].China Biogas, 28(1):21-24. [3] 陈理,崔志阳,董仁杰,等.基于能值分析的规模化沼气工程沼液回流工艺生态效益评价[J].农业工程学报, 2019,35(14):236-242. Chen L, Cui Z Y, Dong R J, et al. Ecological evaluation of large-scale biogas engineering with biogas slurry recycle mode based on emergy analysis method [J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019,35(14):228-234. [4] 李金平,曹鹏,郭精韬,等.沼液回流对牛粪厌氧发酵工程影响[J].太阳能学报, 2021,42(6):469-475. Li J P, Cao P, Guo J T, et al. Effect of reflux ratio of biogas slurry on anaerobic fermentation of cow manure [J].Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2021,42(6):469-475. [5] 董丽丽,曹广丽,武继文,等.沼液回流提升推流式厌氧反应器运行效果研究[J].中国沼气, 2020,38(3):18-27. Dong L L, Cao G L, Wu J W, et al. Biogas slurry reflux promotes the operation of the plug-flow anaerobic reactor [J].China Biogas, 2020,38(3):18-27. [6] 鲁起顺.沼液回流对秸秆厌氧发酵碳氮形态转化及菌群结构的影响[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2019. Lu Q S. Effect of biogas slurry reflux on carbon and nitrogen transformation and microbial community structure in anaerobic fermentation of straw [D].Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2009. [7] 张应鹏,陈广银,黑昆仑,等.沼液全量连续回流对稻秸厌氧发酵特性的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2017,33(9):845-851. Zhang Y P, Chen G Y, Hei K L, et al. Effects of full continuous reflux of biogas slurry on characteristics of rice straw anaerobic digestion [J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2017,33(9):845-851. [8] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M] (第三版).北京:中国农业出版社, 2000: 30-110. Bao S D. Soil agricultural chemistry analysis [M].(3rd edition). Beijing China Agriculture Press, 2000:30-110. [9] 国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法(第四版) [M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002:254-284. State Environmental Protection Administration. Methods for monitoring and analysis of water and wastewater [M].4th Edition. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002:254-284. [10] Zou S Z, Wang X J, Chen Y L, et al. Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion by ultrasonic pretreatment [J].Energy Conversion and Management, 2016,112:226-235. [11] 张应鹏.秸秆沼气沼液全量连续回流抑制机理及缓解技术研究[D].南京:南京农业大学, 2017. Zhang Y P. Inhibition mechanism and alleviating technology of full continuous reflux of digestate for straw biogas [D].Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017. [12] 傅国志.搅拌和沼液回流对麦秸序批式厌氧消化性能影响的试验研究[D].北京:北京化工大学, 2010. Fu G Z. Investigation on effect of mixing and biogas slurry reflux on sequencing batch anaerobic digestion performance of wheat straw [D].Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2010. [13] 李晓丰.盐分对餐厨垃圾有机组分厌氧发酵影响研究[D].重庆:西南交通大学, 2020. Li X F. Study on the effect of salinity on anaerobic digestion of organic components of food waste [D].Chongqing: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020. [14] 陈广银,郑正,邹星星,等.稻草与猪粪不同比例混合的厌氧消化特性[J].环境化学, 2009,28(1):21-25. Chen G Y, Zheng Z, Zou X X, et al. Characteristics of anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and swine feces in various ratios [J].Environmental Chemistry, 2009,28(1):21-25. [15] 宋香育.不同调控措施下猪粪厌氧干发酵特性研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2017. Song X Y. Study of solid-state anaerobic digestion characteristics of pig manure in different control measures [D].Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2017. |
|
|
|