基于承包商支付意愿的工程渣土资源化利用激励机制研究——以长沙市为例

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (639 KB) HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Owing to high-cost concerns, contractors dispose the construction spoils predominantly through landfilling or dumping at present. How to motivate them to adopt recycling is a challenge. A novel contingent valuation method named HCVM was proposed in this study. Taking the survey data of 585 construction employees in Changsha City, Hunan Province as a sample, the contractors’ willingness to pay (WTP) and their influencing factors were analyzed. The unclear pricing principle of non-recycling disposal charge was clarified, and the incentive mechanism for contractor's construction spoils recycling was proposed accordingly. The results show that: 1) the average WTP of contractors is 73.69 yuan/t, which is higher than the current landfilling charge of 20 yuan/t, and the expected penalty cost for dumping of 16.70~25 yuan/t. It is suggested that the government should increase the landfilling cost over 73.69 yuan/t by pricing or tax, and raising the penalty for dumping from 5000 to 15000 yuan per truck. 2) The average disposal cost for construction spoils recycling is 137 yuan/t, and the average price of recycling products selling is 40 yuan/t. Even if including contractors' WTP, it remains lower than the total recycling cost. The government can address this discrepancy with direct monetary subsidies, rewards developing new technologies to reduce the recycling costs or issuing policies to promote the market demand and selling price of recycling products.3) 74.35% of the respondents were willing to pay for the construction spoils recycling. Factors such as the ownership attribute of contractors, pressure from the public, awareness of environmental protection, and satisfaction with current disposal method positively influence their WTP. However, the respondents' construction project experience negatively affected their WTP. The government's guidance, the higher subsidies, rewards of construction spoils recycling and stricter penalties for dumping can also effectively motivate contractors to adopt recycling behaviour.

Key words： construction spoils recycling contractor's willingness to pay factors influencing contractor's willingness to pay hybrid contingent valuation method

Received: 22 August 2024

PACS:

X705

Corresponding Authors: 易欣,责任作者,副教授,ioriyixin@163.com E-mail: ioriyixin@163.com

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YI Xin
	LIU Mo-cun
	LU Jia-hui
	SHEN Liang-feng
	QIU Hui

Cite this article:

YI Xin,LIU Mo-cun,LU Jia-hui等. The incentive mechanism for construction spoils recycling based on contractor's willingness to pay: A case study of Changsha[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2025, 45(4): 2323-2332.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2025/V45/I4/2323

[1] 詹良通,郭淇萌,吴林波,等.城市工程渣土消纳处置及资源化利用途径探讨-以温州市为例[J].环境卫生工程, 2021,29(2):1-9. Zhan L T, Guo Q M, Wu L P, et al. Discussion on the approaches of disposal and resource utilization of the waste soils from urban construction:a case study of Wenzhou[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2021,29(2):1-9.
[2] 刘恒,孙晓辉,牟松,等.盾构渣土资源化处理工艺及成套系统装备研究[J].隧道建设(中英文), 2022,42(2):320-327. Liu H, Sun X, Mu S, et al. Treatment process and a complete set of equipment for resource utilization of waste soil in shield tunneling[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2022,42(2):320.
[3] 谢亦朋,张聪,阳军生,等.盾构隧道渣土资源化再利用技术研究及展望[J].隧道建设(中英文), 2022,42(2):188-207. Xie Y, Zhang C, Yang J, et al. Research and prospect on technology for resource recycling of shield tunnel spoil[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2022,42:188-207.
[4] 刘婷婷,张劼,胡鸣明.建筑废弃物资源化环境效益分析:以重庆为例[J].中国环境科学, 2018,38(10):3853-3867. Liu T T, Zhang J, Hu M M. Analysis on environmental benefits ofconstruction and demolition waste recycling:A case study in Chongqing[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(10):3853-3867.
[5] Chamizo-González J, Cano-Montero E I, Muñoz-Colomina C I. Does funding of waste services follow the polluter pays principle?The case of Spain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,183:1054-1063.
[6] 李双双,易欣,陈景川,等.基于支付卡梯级式CVM的建筑废弃物资源化利用非市场价值评估[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2023,37(4):99-108. Li S S, Yi X, Chen J C, et al. Evaluation of the non-market value of the construction waste recycling based on payment card ladder[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023,37(4):99-108.
[7] 王婧,曾庆军,陈平山,等.废弃渣土造陆的分层填埋方式对比[J].中国港湾建设, 2019,39(8):6-9. Wang J, Zeng Q J, Chen P S, et al. Comparison of stratified landfills for waste residue land making[J]. China Harbour Engineering, 2019, 39(8):6-9.
[8] 陈蕊,杨凯,肖为,等.工程渣土的资源化处理处置分析[J].环境工程, 2020,38(3):22-26. Chen R, Yang K, Xiao W, et al. Analysis on recycling treatment and disposal of engineering slag[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2020, 38(3):22−26.
[9] 肖建庄,沈剑羽,段珍华,等.工程渣土资源化基础问题与低碳技术路径[J].科学通报, 2023,68(21):2722-2736. Xiao J Z, Shen J Y, Duan Z H, et al. Basic problems and low-carbon technical path of construction spoil recycling.[J]. Chin Sci Bull, 2023,68:2722-2736.
[10] Li J, Zuo J, Wang G, et al. Stakeholders'willingness to pay for the new construction and demolition waste landfill charge scheme in Shenzhen:A contingent valuation approach[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020,52:101663.
[11] 石世英,胡鸣明.无废城市背景下项目经理垃圾分类决策行为意向研究-基于计划行为理论框架[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(4):22-26. Shi S Y, HU M M. Research on the project managers'behavioral intentions to construction waste sorting under the background of zero-waste city[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020,34(4):22-26.
[12] Ke J, Cai K, Yuan W, et al. Promoting solid waste management and disposal through contingent valuation method:A review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022,379:134696.
[13] 贾文龙.城市生活垃圾分类治理的居民支付意愿与影响因素研究-基于江苏省的实证分析[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2020,34(4):8-14. Jia W L. Research on residents'willingness to pay for municipal domestic waste classification management and the influencing factors[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020,34(4):8-14.
[14] 蒋磊,张俊飚,何可.基于农户兼业视角的农业废弃物资源循环利用意愿及其影响因素比较-以湖北省为例[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2014,23(10):1432-1439. Jiang L, Zhang J B, He K. Comparisons of farmers'willingness to recycle resources of agricultural waste and influencing factors in the perspective of farmers'concurrent business-An empirical evidence from Hubei Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014,23(10):1432−1439.
[15] 赵俊伟,陈永福,尹昌斌.生猪养殖粪污处理社会化服务的支付意愿与支付水平分析[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,(4):90-97,173-174. Zhao J W, Jiang H, Chen Y F, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of manure pollution treatment in scale pig breeding:Based on the perspective of willingness-to-behavior transformation[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(8):1708-1719.
[16] Begum R A, Siwar C, Pereira J J, et al. Factors and values of willingness to pay for improved construction waste management-A perspective of Malaysian contractors[J]. Waste Management, 2007, 27(12):1902-1909.
[17] Lu W, Peng Y, Webster C, et al. Stakeholders'willingness to pay for enhanced construction waste management:A Hong Kong study[J]. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 2015,47:233-240.
[18] Véliz K D, Ramírez-Rodríguez G, Ossio F. Willingness to pay for construction and demolition waste from buildings in Chile[J]. Waste Management, 2022,137:222-230.
[19] 苏红岩,王华.意愿调查法中的偏好不确定性研究综述[J].资源科学, 2019,41(12):2327-2341. Su H Y, Wang H. A review of preference uncertainty in contingent valuation method[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(12):2327-2341.
[20] 李京梅,郝阳,单菁竹.海洋垃圾治理公众支付意愿评估-基于社会期望效应偏差修正视角[J].资源科学, 2023,45(7):1469-1479. Li J M, Hao Y, Shan J Z. Evaluation of public willingness to pay for marine litter management based on the correction of social desirability bias[J]. Resources Science, 2023,45(7):1469-1479.
[21] 李京梅,丁中贤,许婉婷,等.基于双边界二分式CVM的国家公园门票定价研究-以胶州湾国家海洋公园为例[J].资源科学, 2020, 42(2):232-241. Li J M, Ding Z X, Xu W T, et al. National park ticket pricing based on double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation method for the Jiaozhou Bay National Marine Park[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(2):232-241.
[22] Hanemann W M, Kriström B, Li C. Nonmarket Valuation under Preference Uncertainty:Econometric Models and Estimation[C]. Umea:The Annual Meeting of the European Association of Envi-ronmental& Resource Economists, 1995.
[23] Xu F, Wang Y, Xiang N, et al. Uncovering the willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation:A survey of the capital area in China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020,162:105053.
[24] 武照亮.CVM在中国资源环境价值评估中的应用[J].中国环境科学, 2022,42(10):4931-4938. Wu Z L.Application of contingent valuation method in resources and environmental value assessment in China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(10):4931-4938.
[25] 敖长林,袁伟,王锦茜,等.零支付对条件价值法评估结果的影响-以三江平原湿地生态保护价值为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(8):42-48. Ao C L, Yuan W, Wang J X, et al. The impact of zero observations on welfare measurement-Evidence from the ecological value evaluation of the Sanjiang plain wetland[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019,33(8):42-48.
[26] 单菁竹,李京梅,许志华.CVM中的抗议性响应:动机与影响--以胶州湾浒苔治理支付意愿为例[J].自然资源学报, 2020,35(3):626-638. Shan J Z, Li J M, Xu Z H. The protest response in contingent valuation method:Motivation and impact:A case study of willingness to pay for the governance of green tides in Jiao zhou Bay[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(3):626-638.
[27] 肖建红,程文虹,赵玉宗,等.群岛旅游资源非使用价值评估嵌入效应研究--以舟山群岛为例[J].旅游学刊, 2021,36(7):132-148. Xiao J H, Cheng W H, Zhao Y Z, et al. The study on embedding effects resulted from using the contingent valuation method to measure non-use values of marine tourism resources in archipelago tourism destinations:Based on a case of Zhou shan Archipelago of Zhejiang[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021,36(7):132-148.
[28] 相瑞兵,田成诗,张焰朝.环境规制与企业研发投入:挤出抑或诱发-来自二氧化硫排污费征收的经验证据[J].中国环境科学, 2023, 43(12):6803-6816. Xiang R B, Tian C S, Zhang Y C, et al. Environmental regulation and firm R&D investment:crowding out or inducing-Empirical evidence from the collection of sulfur dioxide pollution fees[J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(12):6803-6816.
[29] Yu B, Wang J, Liao Y, et al. Determinants affecting purchase willingness of contractors towards construction and demolition waste recycling products:an empirical study in Shenzhen, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021,18(9):4412.
[30] He Q, Wang Z, Wang G, et al. To be green or not to be:How environmental regulations shape contractor greenwashing behaviors in construction projects[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020,63:102462.
[31] 甘彬霖,林忠财,施敏蛟,等.长沙市废弃混凝土处理及回收利用现状分析与研究展望[J].混凝土, 2019,(6):134-139. Gan B L, Lin Z C, Shi M J, et al. St at us analysis and research prospect of t he disposal and recycling of w ast e concret e in Changsha[J]. Concrete, 2019,(6):134-139.
[32] Véliz K D, Ramírez-Rodríguez G, Ossio F. Willingness to pay for construction and demolition waste from buildings in Chile[J]. Waste Management, 2022,137:222-230.
[33] 长沙市城市管理局.长沙市建筑垃圾管理规定[EB/OL](2015-07-08)[2024-8-19] http://www.changsha.gov.cn/zfxxgk/zfwjk/srmzf/201507/t20150709_784608.html. Changsha City Urban Management Bureau. Changsha Construction Waste Management Regulations[EB/OL](2015-07-08)[2024-8-19] http://www.changsha.gov.cn/zfxxgk/zfwjk/srmzf/201507/t20150709_784608.html.
[34] Du L, Feng Y, Lu W, et al. Evolutionary game analysis of stakeholders'decision-making behaviours in construction and demolition waste management[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2020, 84:106408.
[35] 袁剑,曾现来,陈明.基于灰色系统理论的济南市建筑废物产量预测[J].中国环境科学, 2020,40(9):3894-3902. Yuan J, Zeng X L, Chen M. Estimating the construction waste generation in Jinan using the grey system theory[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(9):3894-3902.