|
|
Start-up and operation performance of anammox process enhanced by ultrasound irradiation |
ZHANG Dian-dian, WANG Tao, SHAO Jing-jing, LI Lin, WANG Zhi-qiang |
College of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China |
|
|
Abstract By batch experiment, the optimal working parameters of ultrasonic enhancement of Anammox bacteria activity were obtained:ultrasound frequency of 25kHz, ultrasound time of 3 min and ultrasound intensity of 0.2 W/cm2; afterwards a fixed-bed reactor was inoculated with the traditional activated sludge to start up Anammox process under the optimal ultrasound enhancing conditions. During the whole experiment, the temperature was maintained at 35℃. In the start-up stage, the hydraulic retention time (HRT) was 2 days and the influent NH4+-N and NO2--N concentrations were both controlled at 70mg/L. After 38days operation of the reactor, the Anammox activity appeared for the first time. After 53days operation, NH4+-N and NO2--N removal rates were up to 30.81mgN/(L·d) and 34.97mgN/(L·d) and their corresponding removal efficiencies reached 88.03% and 99.91% respectively, and the total nitrogen removal rate and removal efficiency reached 60.34mgN/(L·d) and 86.20% respectively. R1and R2 were stabilized at 1.14 and 0.18. In the nitrogen loading enhancement stage (day 53~135), when the influent NH4+-N and NO2--N loading rates were both maintained at 380mg/(L·d), the average removal efficiencies of NH4+-N and NO2--N were 82.74% and 97.89%. The max NH4+-N and NO2--N removal rates were up to 320.67mgN/(L·d) and 379.85mgN/(L·d), while the max total nitrogen removal rate and efficiency were 698.00mgN/(L·d)and 91.84% respectively. At the end of the nitrogen loading enhancement stage, R1 was stabilized at 1.18 while R2 was close to 0. In the reactor, Anammox bacteria predominated and a small amount of denitrifying bacteria coexisted with them so as to improve the total nitrogen removal.
|
Received: 18 September 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Rui D, Peng Y, Cao S, et al. Advanced nitrogen removal from wastewater by combining anammox with partial denitrification[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015,179(179C):497-504.
|
[2] |
Jetten M S, Strous M, Kt P S, et al. The anaerobic oxidation of ammonium[J]. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 1998,22(5):421-437.
|
[3] |
Jetten M S, Wagner M, Fuerst J, et al. Microbiology and application of the anaerobic ammonium oxidation ('anammox') process[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2001,12(3):283-288.
|
[4] |
Guillén J A S, Yimman Y, Vazquez C M L, et al. Effects of Organic Carbon Source, COD/N Ratio and Temperature on Anammox Organisms[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society for Dental Materials & Devices, 2012,31(4):732-743.
|
[5] |
李亚峰,张文静,马晨曦.pH值和DO对厌氧氨氧化脱氮性能的影响[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,29(04):715-720.
|
[6] |
Yin X, Qiao S, Zhou J, et al. Fast start-up of the anammox process with addition of reduced graphene oxides[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016,283:160-166.
|
[7] |
Liu S, Yang F, Meng F, et al. Enhanced anammox consortium activity for nitrogen removal:impacts of static magnetic field[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2008,138(3):96-102.
|
[8] |
汪涛,张贺,张沙,等.超声波联用技术在污水处理中的研究进展[J]. 现代化工, 2015,35(7):10-13.
|
|
|
|