页岩气开采压裂返排水对污泥活性的影响

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (47)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (481 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

The development of shale gas is a state key energy strategy, the potential environmental risks caused by the flowback water have attracted attention. To develop the economical and environmentally friendly biological treatment technology for the flowback water, the activated sludge from the sewage treatment plant was used as the test subject in this study. The inhibitory effects of the organic oxidation activity and the nitrification activity of activated sludge was analyzed through the respiratory measurement experiment. The inhibitory effect of glutaraldehyde, benzalkonium chloride (ADBAC) and salinity on the activated sludge were further identified. The flowback water had very weak inhibition on the organic oxidation activity and very strong inhibition on the nitrification activity, and the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) were 75.5% and 10.09%, respectively. The IC₅₀ of glutaraldehyde, ADBAC and salinity to the nitrification activity on activated sludge were 0.0589, 0.0194, 3.63g/L, respectively. The biological treatment of organic pollutants in flowback water was feasible, but it didn¢t work well on denitrification. Salinity, glutaraldehyde and ADBAC had inhibitory effect on the nitrification activity. IC₅₀ of the bactericide was in an order of magnitude difference from the IC₅₀ of the salinity, and the influence of the bactericide need to be paid more attention during biological treatment of the flowback water.

Key words： flowback water activated sludge salinity biocides inhibition effect

Received: 07 November 2018

PACS:

X703

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LU Pei-li
	CHEN Chao
	HUANG Yong-kui
	LIU Jun
	ZHANG Wen-yu
	QIU Zhe

Cite this article:

LU Pei-li,CHEN Chao,HUANG Yong-kui等. The effect of the flowback water from shale gas extraction on the activated sludge[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2019, 39(6): 2452-2459.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V39/I6/2452

[1]	Gregory K B, Vidic R D, Dzombak D A. Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing[J]. Elements, 2011,7(3):181-186.
[2]	卢培利,邱哲,张代钧,等.页岩气开采返排废水有机污染物研究进展与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2018,37(3):1161-1166.Lu P L, Qiu Z, Zhang D J, et al. Research progress and prospects of organic pollutants in shale gas flowback wastewater[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018,37(3):1161-1166.
[3]	Shaffer D L, Chavez L H A, Bensasson M, et al. Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water:Drivers, technologies, and future directions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013,47(17):9569-9583.
[4]	Murali Mohan A, Hartsock A, Bibby K J, et al. Microbial community changes in hydraulic fracturing fluids and produced water from shale gas extraction[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(22):13141-13150.
[5]	Strong L C. Biodegradation in waters from hydraulic fracturing:Chemistry, microbiology, and engineering[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013,140(5):1940-1945.
[6]	Mall A., Buccino S, & Nichols, J. Drilling down:protecting western communities from the health and environmental effects of oil and gas production[R]. Natural Resources Defense Council, 2007.
[7]	Vengosh A, Jackson R B, Warner N, et al. A Critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the united states[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014,48(15):8334-8348.
[8]	Vidic R D, Brantley S L, Vandenbossche J M, et al. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality[J]. Science, 2013,340(6134):1235009.
[9]	Estrada J M, Rao B. A review of the issues and treatment options for wastewater from shale gas extraction by hydraulic fracturing[J]. Fuel, 2016,182:292-303.
[10]	Igunnu E T, Chen G Z. Produced water treatment technologies[J]. International Journal of Low Carbon Technologies, 2014,9(3):1-21.
[11]	Ahmadun Fakhru'l-Razi, Pendashteh A, Abdullah L C, et al. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009,170(2):530-551.
[12]	Struchtemeyer C G, Morrison M D, Elshahed M S. A critical assessment of the efficacy of biocides used during the hydraulic fracturing process in shale natural gas wells[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2012,71:15-21.
[13]	Dawson J, Wood M. A new approach to biocide application provides improved efficiency in fracturing fluids[Z]. SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference & Exhibition-From Potential to Production, 2012.
[14]	Bottero S, Picioreanu C, Enzien M V, et al. Formation damage and impact on gas flow caused by biofilms growing within proppant packing used in hydraulic fracturing[Z]. SPE International Symposium and Exhibiton on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010.
[15]	Lester Y, Yacob T, Morrissey I, et al. Can we treat hydraulic fracturing flowback with a conventional biological process? The case of guar gum[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2013, 1(1):133-136.
[16]	Johnson K, French K, Fichter J K, et al. Use of microbiocides in Barnett Shale gas well fracturing fluids to control bacteria related problems[Z]. CORROSION 2008, NACE International, 2008.
[17]	Stringfellow W T, Domen J K, Camarillo M K, et al. Physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of compounds used in hydraulic fracturing[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2014,275:37-54.
[18]	Ferrer I, Thurman E M. Analysis of hydraulic fracturing additives by LC/Q-TOF-MS[J]. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2015, 407(21):6417-6428.
[19]	Rozell D J, Reaven S J. Water pollution risk associated with natural gas extraction from the marcellus shale[J]. Risk Analysis, 2012, 32(8):1382-1393.
[20]	Chen M, Zhang X, Wang Z, et al. Impacts of quaternary ammonium compounds on membrane bioreactor performance:Acute and chronic responses of microorganisms[J]. Water Research, 2018,134:153-161.
[21]	卢培利,张代钧,张欣,等.混合呼吸仪评估pH值和重金属对污泥活性的抑制[J]. 中国环境科学, 2008,28(5):422-426.Lu P L, Zhang D J, Zhang X, et al. Hybrid respirometer to assess pH and inhibition of sludge activity by heavy metals[J]. China Environmental Science, 2008,28(5):422-426.
[22]	卢培利,张代钧,张欣,等.自动混合呼吸测量仪的开发与验证[J]. 环境工程学报, 2007,(5):118-123.Lu P L, Zhang D J, Zhang X, et al. Development and verification of automatic hybrid breath meter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2007,(5):118-123.
[23]	罗梦,于茵,周岳溪,等.石化废水处理过程中活性污泥毒性变化[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(3):963-971.Luo M, Yu Y, Zhou Y X, et al. Toxicity change of activated sludge in petrochemical wastewater treatment[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017,37(3):963-971.
[24]	Ziemkiewicz P F, HE Y T. Evolution of water chemistry during Marcellus shale gas development:a case study in west Virginia[J]. Chemosphere, 2015,134:224-231.
[25]	Shih J S, Saiers J E, Anisfeld S C, et al. Characterization and analysis of liquid waste from marcellus shale gas development[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015,49(16):9557.
[26]	Strong L C. Biodegradation in waters from hydraulic fracturing:chemistry, microbiology, and engineering[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013,140(5):1940-1945.
[27]	闫力源.页岩气开采返排废水特性及其预处理技术实验研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2016.Yan L Y. Researches on the characteristics and pretreatment techniques of flowback wastewater from shale gas extraction[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2016.
[28]	Barbot E, Vidic N S, Gregory K B, et al. Spatial and temporal correlation of water quality parameters of produced waters from devonian-age shale following hydraulic fracturing[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013,47(6):2562-2569.
[29]	Migneault I, Dartiguenave C, Bertrand M J, et al. Glutaraldehyde:Behavior in aqueous solution, reaction with proteins, and application to enzyme crosslinking[J]. Biotechniques, 2004,37(5):790-806.
[30]	Maillard J Y. Bacterial target sites for biocide action[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2002,92:12.
[31]	Jopp K. Comparative Performance of industrial water treatment biocides[J]. História Ciências Saúde-Manguinhos, 2011,20(3):1057-1078.
[32]	Leung H W. Ecotoxicology of glutaraldehyde:Review of environmental fate and effects studies[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2001,49(1):26-39.
[33]	Ferk F, Miší, Mi, Hoelzl C, et al. Benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and dimethyldioctadecyl-ammonium bromide (DDAB), two common quaternary ammonium compounds, cause genotoxic effects in mammalian and plant cells at environmentally relevant concentrations[J]. Mutagenesis, 2007,22(6):363-370.
[34]	Jovovic M, Kostic N, Jancic-Stojanovic B, et al. Investigation of tropicamide and benzalkonium chloride stability using liquid chromatography[J]. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 2012,35(2):231-239.
[35]	Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Alkyl Dimethyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride (ADBAC), EPA739-R-06-009[Z]. Washington, DC, USA:United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Government Printing Office:2006.
[36]	Henderson N D. A review of the environmental impact and toxic effects of DDAC[M]. The Division, 1992.
[37]	Teresa Garcíarcresa Garc D. Anchez-Leal J, et al. Sorption of alkyl benzyl dimethyl ammonium compounds by activated sludge[J]. Journal of dispersion science and technology, 2006,27(5):739-744.
[38]	Ismail Z Z, Tezel U, Pavlostathis S G. Sorption of quaternary ammonium compounds to municipal sludge[J]. Water research, 2010, 44(7):2303-2313.
[39]	Xu S, Boyd S A. Cationic surfactant sorption to a vermiculitic subsoil via hydrophobic bonding[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1995,29(2):312-320.
[40]	Ersoy B, Çelik M S. Effect of hydrocarbon chain length on adsorption of cationic surfactants onto clinoptilolite[J]. Clays and Clay Minerals, 2003,51(2):172-180.
[41]	Droge S, Goss K U. Effect of sodium and calcium cations on the ion-exchange affinity of organic cations for soil organic matter[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2012,46(11):5894-5901.
[42]	Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Glutaraldehyde, EPA 739-R-07-006. United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S[M]. Washington, DC, USA:Government Printing Office, 2007.
[43]	Jain P, Sharma M, Dureja P, et al. Bioelectrochemical approaches for removal of sulfate, hydrocarbon and salinity from produced water[J]. Chemosphere, 2017,166:96-108.
[44]	李玲玲.高盐度废水生物处理特性研究[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学, 2006.Li L L. Study of biological treatment of high-salinity wastewater[D]. Qingdao:Ocean University of China, 2006.
[45]	李彬,王志伟,安莹,等.盐度对膜-生物反应器污泥表观硝化速率的抑制机理[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014,34(2):371-377.Li B, Wang Z W, An Y, et al. Inhibition mechanism of salinity on apparent nitrification rate of membrane-bioreactor sludge[J]. China Environmental Science, 2014,34(2):371-377.
[46]	陈翱翔.好氧颗粒污泥SBR处理页岩气开采水力压裂返排废水的研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2017.Chen A X. The Treatment of Flowback Wastewater from the Hydraulic Fracturing for Shale Gas Extraction by Aerobic Granular Sludge SBR[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2017.
[47]	Daniel J R, Sheldon J R. Water pollution risk associated with natural gas extraction from the marcellus shale[J]. Risk Analysis, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01757.x.