|
|
Calculation method and case analysis of carbon emissions for risk control and management of contaminated sites |
MENG Hao1, DONG Jing-qi2,3, ZHANG Hong-zhen2,3, XIAO meng1, LI Xiang-lan1 |
1. College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 2. Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100012, China; 3. National Engineering Laboratory for Site Remediation Technologies, Beijing 100015, China |
|
|
Abstract The study adopted emission factor method and took a large closed agricultural pharmaceutical factory in Hebei as a case to calculate carbon emissions of risk control and management of contaminated site from four aspects: mechanical energy consumption, power, materials and transportation. The results showed that the net carbon sequestration of risk control and management in the case site within 5years was 113.56t, including 458.49t of total process carbon emissions and 572.05t of total carbon sequestration; Barrier measures and site survey activities were the most important carbon emission links, accounting for 36.78% and 34.12% of the total carbon emissions respectively, of which construction materials and construction machinery account for 97.88%; The risk control carbon emission intensity of unit contaminated soil were 2.54kg/m3, which had obvious low-carbon advantages compared with solidification stabilization (34.78kg/m3), ectopic thermal desorption (212.22kg/m3), chemical leaching (35.83kg/m3) and chemical oxidation (27.78kg/m3); The sensitivity of mechanical activities and barrier materials to carbon emission factors were the strongest. In the 95% confidence interval, the carbon emission of this part in the case fluctuated between 417.84t and 500.40t; Adopted more green and low-carbon barrier membranes, gave priority to the procurement and transportation of electrical driven mechanical equipment and localized materials, improved the proportion of renewable energy and green power input in monitoring equipment operation and maintenance, and increased the richness of ecological landscape, which were conducive to achieving the goal of low-carbon management of site risk control.
|
Received: 10 December 2022
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 骆永明.中国污染场地修复的研究进展、问题与展望[J].环境监测管理与技术, 2011,23(3):1-6. Luo Y M. Contaminated site remediation in China: process,problems and perspect [J].Environmental monitoring management and technology, 2011,23(3):1-6. [2] 李培中,吴乃瑾,王海见,等.基于全周期场地概念模型的场地环境精准调查应用案例[J].环境科学, 2021,42(3):1123-1130. Li P Z, Wu N J, Wang H J, et al. Application case of accurate site investigation with life-cycle conceptual site model development [J].Environmental Science, 2021,42(3):1123-1130. [3] 廖晓勇,崇忠义,阎秀兰,等.城市工业污染场地:中国环境修复领域的新课题[J].环境科学, 2011,32(3):784-794. Liao X Y, Chong Z Y, Yan X L, et al. Urban industrial contaminated sites: a new issue in the field of environmental remediation in China [J].Environmental Science, 2011,32(3):784-794. [4] Yasutaka T, Zhang H, Murayama K, et al. Development of a green remediation tool in Japan [J].Science of the Total Environment, 2016,563813-821. [5] Bare J, Gloria T, Norris G. Development of the method and US normalization database for life cycle impact assessment and sustainability metrics [J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2007,41(11):4179-4179. [6] Hou D Y, Al-Tabbaa A, Guthrie P, et al. Using a hybrid LCA method to evaluate the sustainability of sediment remediation at the London Olympic Park [J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014,8387-95. [7] Gill R T, Thornton S F, Harbottle M J, et al. Sustainability assessment of electrokinetic bioremediation compared with alternative remediation options for a petroleum release site [J].J. Environ. Manage, 2016,184(Pt 1):120-131. [8] 刘锴,宋易南,侯德义.污染地块修复的社会可持续性与公众知情研究[J].环境保护, 2018,46(9):37-42. Liu K, Song Y N, Hou D Y, Social sustainability of contaminated site remediation and public awareness [J].Environmental Protection, 2018,46(9):37-42. [9] Hou D Y. Sustainable remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater [Z].2020. [10] O'Connor D, Hou D Y. Targeting cleanups towards a more sustainable future [J].Environmental Science-Processes & Impacts, 2018,20(2): 266-269. [11] Mukhopadhyay R, Bhaduri D, Sarkar B, et al. Clay-polymer nanocomposites: progress and challenges for use in sustainable water treatment [J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020,383,10.1016/ j.jhazmat.2019.121125. [12] 焦文涛,方引青,李绍华,等.美国污染地块风险管控的发展历程、演变特征及启示[J].环境工程学报, 2021,15(5):1821-1830. Jiao W T, Fang Y Q, Li S H, et al. risk control and management of contaminated sites in the United States: development process, evolution characteristics and enlightenment [J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2021,15(5):1821-1830. [13] 生态环境部土壤生态环境司,生态环境部南京环境科学研究所.土壤污染风险管控与修复技术手册[M].北京:中国环境出版集团, 2021. Department of Soil Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment. Technical manual for risk control and management of contaminated Soil [M].Beijing: China Environmental Publishing Group, 2021. [14] 李笑诺,易诗懿,陈卫平.污染场地风险管控可持续评价指标体系构建及关键影响因素分析[J].环境科学, 2022,43(5):2699-2708. Li X N, Yi S Y, Chen W P. Construction of sustainability evaluation index system for contaminated site risk management and analysis on key influential factors [J].Environmental Science, 2022,43(5):2699-2708. [15] 李笑诺,陈卫平,吕斯丹.国内外污染场地风险管控技术体系与模式研究进展[J].土壤学报, 2022,59(1):38-53. Li X N, Chen W P, LÜ S D. Advancement in researches on technical systems and modes for risk management and control of contaminated sites at home and aboard [J].Acta Pedologica sinica, 2022,59(1):38– 53. [16] 刘爽,陈盼,宋慧敏,等.我国华东地区污染土壤异位热脱附修复碳排放及减排策略[J].环境工程学报, 2022,16(8):2663-2671. Liu S, Chen P, Song H M, et al. Carbon emissions and emission reduction strategy for remediation of contaminated soil by ex-situ thermal desorption in East China [J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2022,16(8):2663-2671. [17] Amponsah N Y, Wang J Y, Zhao L.A review of life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of commonly used ex-situ soil treatment technologies [J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,186514-525. [18] 薛成杰,方战强.土壤修复产业碳达峰碳中和路径研究[J].环境工程, 2022,40(8):231-238. Xue C J, Fang Z Q, Path of carbon emission peaking and carbon neutrality in soil remediation industry [J].Environmental Engineering, 2022,40(8):231-238. [19] 周实际,孙慧洋,李颖臻,等.重金属污染土壤稳定化技术碳排放计算方法及工程案例研究[J].中国环境科学, 2022,42(10):4840-4848. Zhou S J, Sun H Y, Li Y Z, et al. Carbon emission evaluation of heavy metal contaminated soil stabilization processes and case study [J].China Environmental Science, 2022,42(10):4840-4848. [20] Gallagher P M, Spatari S, Cucura J. Hybrid life cycle assessment comparison of colloidal silica and cement grouted soil barrier remediation technologies [J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 250421-430. [21] Higgins M R, Olson T M. Life-cycle case study comparison of permeable reactive barrier versus pump-and-teat remediation [J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2009,43(24):9432-9438. [22] Mak M S H, Lo I M C. Environmental Life cycle assessment of permeable reactive barriers: effects of construction methods, reactive materials and groundwater constituents [J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2011,45(23):10148-10154. [23] 马娇阳, 田稳, 王坤,等. 污染场地土壤重金属的生物可给性及毒性研究[J].中国环境科学, 2021,41(10):4885-4893. Ma J Y, Tian W, Wang K, et al. Bioaccessibility and their toxic effects of heavy metal in field soils from an electronic disassembly plant [J].China Environmental Science, 2021,41(10):4885-4893. [24] 刘文晓,夏天翔,张丽娜,等.基于修复效果的污染土壤修复工程环境足迹分析[J].环境科学研究, 2022,35(10)2367-2377. Liu W X, Xia T X, Zhang L N, Environmental footprint analysis of contaminated soil remediation projects based on remediation effects [J].Research of Environmental Sciences, 2022,35(10)2367-2377. [25] ISO 1404 environmental management life cycle assessment general principles and framework: [S].Geneva: ISO: 2006: [26] 翟一杰,张天祚,申晓旭,等.生命周期评价方法研究进展[J].资源科学, 2021,43(3):446-455. Zhai Y J, Zhang T Z, Shen X X, et al. Development of life cycle assessment method [J].Resources Science, 2021,43(3):446-455. [27] 陈恺,孙硕,韩伟欣,等.污染场地修复现状及修复技术展望[C]// 中国环境科学学会2022年科学技术年会--环境工程技术创新与应用分会场, 南昌, 2022:267-271. Chen K, Sun S, Han W X, et al. Remediation of contaminated sites and prospects of remediation technologies [C]//2022 Annual Science and Technology Conference of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences --Environmental Engineering Technology Innovation and Application Sub-conference, Nanchang, 2022:267-271. [28] HJ25.5-2018污染地块风险管控与土壤修复效果评估技术导则[S].HJ25.5-2018 Technical guideline for verification of risk control and soil remediation of contaminated site [S]. [29] Strategy to ensure institutional control implementation at superfund sites [Z].US EPA. 2004. [30] 赵彬,侯德义,张昊,等.汞污染地块风险全生命周期管控技术体系研究[J].中国环境科学, 2022,42(5):2423-2432. Zhao B, Hou D Y, Zhang H, et al. Study on the technical system of life cycle risk management for mercury-contaminated sites [J].Chinese Environmental Science, 2022,42(5):2423-2432. [31] 马欣程,徐红霞,孙媛媛,等.氯代烃污染场地生物自然衰减修复研究进展[J].中国环境科学, 2022,42(11):5285-5298. Ma X C, Xu H X, Sun Y Y, et al. Research progress on biotic natural attenuation for the remediation of chlorinated hydrocarbon-contaminated sites [J].China Environmental Science, 2022,42(11): 5285-5298. [32] 胡清,王宏,童立志.绿色可持续场地修复[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2018. Hu Q, Wang H, Tong L Z. Green sustainable site restoration [M].Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2018. [33] Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories [R].Paris: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, United Nations Environment Program, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, International Energy Agency, 1997. [34] 郭运功.特大城市温室气体排放量测算与排放特征分析[D].上海:华东师范大学, 2009. Guo Y G. The analysis on calculation and characteristics fo greenhouse gas emission in mega cities-a case study of Shanghai[D].Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2009. [35] 钟流举,郑君瑜,雷国强,等.大气污染物排放源清单不确定性定量分析方法及案例研究[J].环境科学研究, 2007,(4):15-20. Zhong L J, Zhen J Y, Lei G Q, et al. Quantitative uncertainty analysis in air pollution emission inventories methodology and case study [J].Research of Environmental Sciences, 2007,(4):15-20. [36] 城市温室气体核算工具指南[Z].Guide to urban greenhouse gas accounting tools [Z]. [37] 中国产品全生命周期温室气体排放系数集[Z].2022. Life cycle greenhouse gas emission coefficient set of products in China [Z].2022. [38] GB/T 51366-2019住房和城乡建设部.建筑碳排放计算标准[S].GB/T 51366-2019 Ministry of housing and urban-rural development standards for calculating carbon emissions from buildings [S]. [39] 天津市城市绿地碳汇设计导则(试行) [Z].天津市城市管理委员会, 2022. Tianjin urban green space carbon sink design guidelines (Trial) [Z].Tianjin urban management commission, 2022. [40] 耿樟帅.土工膜的应用现状及未来发展趋势研究[J].江苏科技信息, 2022,39(12):47-49. Geng Z S. Application status and future development trend of geomembrane [J].Jiangsu Science and Technology Information, 2022, 39(12):47-49. [41] 岑晓倩,张亚庆.混凝土CO2排放计算和评价的研究进展[J].绿色科技, 2022,24(20):136-141. Cen X Q, Zhang Y Q, Research progress in calculation and evaluation of CO2 emissions from concrete [J].Journal of Green Science and Technolog, 2022,24(20):136-141. [42] Song Y A, Kirkwood N, Maksimovic C, et al. Nature based solutions for contaminated land remediation and brownfield redevelopment in cities: a review [J].Science of the Total Environment, 2019,663:568-579. |
|
|
|