PDF(596 KB)
PDF(596 KB)

PDF(596 KB)
不同工况下轻型车油耗试验驾驶方式评价
Evaluation of the driving way of light-duty vehicle fuel consumption test in different driving cycle
在一台性能稳定的汽油车上由同一驾驶人员按平顺、粗暴和正常3种驾驶方式分别进行NEDC (新欧洲行驶工况)、FTP75(美国认证工况)以及WLTC (世界统一轻型车测试循环)工况油耗试验,采用能量变化率(ER)、距离变化率(DR)、能量经济性变化率(EER)、绝对速度改变率(ASCR)、速度平方根误差(RMSSE)以及惯性做功改变率(IWR)6个指标作为驾驶质量评价指标,通过分析计算每次试验各项评价指标及其与燃料消耗量变化的相关性,确定了油耗试验驾驶方式的合理性边界条件.结果表明,对于WLTC和FTP75工况,平顺驾驶和粗暴驾驶均会导致评价指标变大或者变小,驾驶方式与评价指标呈规律性变化;对于NEDC工况,不同的驾驶方式对NEDC工况油耗影响较小.油耗试验的边界条件,WLTC工况的EER为(0.25±0.47)%、ASCR为(1.20±0.97)%、RMSSE为(0.85+0.15)km/h、IWR为(2.15±1.27)%时,可认为油耗试验的驾驶方式较为合理;FTP75工况的EER为(-0.09±0.69)%、ASCR为(-0.59±0.42)%、RMSSE为(0.88+0.34)km/h以及IWR为(-0.69±1.66)%时,油耗试验的驾驶方式较为合理.
The NEDC、FTP75and WLTC cycle fuel consumption test were carried out in a stabilized gasoline car with three different driving ways including smooth, rough and normal driving by the same driver. Based on the evaluation of energy rating (ER), distance rating (DR), energy economy rating (EER), absolute speed change rating (ASCR), root mean squared speed error (RMSSE) and inertia work rate (IWR), the rationality of the boundary conditions of fuel consumption test were obtained through the analysis and calculation of the above evaluation index and the change of fuel consumption of each test. Smooth and rough driving both resulted in the regular change of evaluation index in FTP75 and WLTC test. However, the different driving way had little effect on fuel consumption in NEDC test. The boundary conditions of fuel consumption test were obtained as below. When ER was in the range of (0.25±0.47)%, ASCR was in the range of (1.20±0.97)%, RMSSE was in the range of (0.85+0.15)km/h, IWR was in the range of (2.15±1.27)%,the driving ways of the WLTC cycle fuel consumption test were reasonable. For the cycle of FTP75, the reasonable driving ways of fuel consumption test ought to make sure that EER, ASCR, RMSSE and IWR ranged among (-0.09±0.69)%, (-0.59±0.42)%, (0.88+0.34)km/h and (-0.69±1.66)% respectively.
the boundary condition / the driving cycle / the driving ways / the fuel consumption test
[1] 中华人民共和国环境保护部.中国机动车环境管理年报(2018)[Z]. 2013.Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. China vehicle environmental management annual report (2018)[Z]. 2013.
[2] 王慧慧,曾维华,吴开亚.上海市机动车尾气排放协同控制效应研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(5):1345-1352.Wang H H, Zeng W H, Wu K Y. Co-control effects of motor vehicle pollutant emission in Shanghai[J]. China Environmental Sciencece, 2016,36(5):1345-1352.
[3] 温溢,刘俊女,刘宪,等.北京市第五阶段出租车排放劣化特性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(12):4487-4492.Wen Y, Liu J N, Liu X, et al. Emission deterioration characteristics of the China five stage taxis in Beijing[J]. China Environmental Sciencece, 2017,37(12):4487-4492.
[4] 余南娇,黄渤,李梅,等.大气细颗粒物扬尘源单颗粒质谱特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(4):1262-1268.Yu N J, Huang B, Li M, et al. Single particle characteristics of fine particulate matter in dust[J]. China Environmental Sciencece, 2017,37(4):1262-1268.
[5] 中华人民共和国国务院.节能与新能源汽车产业发展规划(2012~2020年)[Z]. 北京, 2012.The state council of the People's Republic of China. Regulations on energy conservation and new energy vehicle industry development (2012~2020)[Z]. Beijing, 2012.
[6] GB/T 19233-2008轻型汽车燃料消耗量试验方法[S].GB/T 19233-2008 Test method for fuel consumption of light vehicles[S].
[7] Guillou M, Bradley C. Fuel Consumption testing to verify the effect of tire rolling resistance on fuel economy[Z]. SAE 2010 World Congress & Exhibition, 2010.
[8] Christenson M, Loiselle A, Karman D, et al. The effect of driving conditions and ambient temperature on light duty gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles (2):fuel consumption and gaseous pollutant emission rates[C]//Eurocurrencies and the international monetary system/American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 2007:614-619.
[9] Thomas J, Huff S, West B. Fuel economy and emissions effects of low tire pressure, open windows, roof top and hitch-mounted cargo, and trailer[J]. Exteriors, 2014,7(2):862-872.
[10] Henning Lohse-Busch, Michael Duoba, Eric Rask, et al. Ambient temperature (20°F, 72°F and 95°F) impact on fuel and energy consumption for several conventional vehicles, hybrid and plug-In hybrid electric vehicles and battery electric vehicle[Z]. SAE Paper 2013, 1462.
[11] 郑贺悦,陆红雨,戴春蓓,等.实验室内车辆油耗测量影响因素研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2004,26(3):279-282.Zheng H Y, Lu H Y, Dai C B, et al. A study on the factors affecting vehicle fuel consumption measurement in laboratory[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2004,26(3):279-282.
[12] 袁建军,于津涛.轻型车行驶阻力影响因素及其对油耗的影响研究[J]. 北京汽车, 2015,6:23-26.Yuan J J, Yu J T. Research on influence factors of driving resistance of light vehicles and its influence on fuel consumption[J]. Beijing automotive, 2015,6:23-26.
[13] 袁建军,于津涛,王峰.环境因素对汽车行驶阻力和油耗的影响[J]. 北京汽车, 2017,1:24-27.Yuan J J, Yu J T, Wang F. Influence of environmental factors on vehicle driving resistance and fuel consumption[J]. Beijing Automotive, 2017,1:24-27.
[14] 黄山.轻型汽油车Ⅰ型排放与工况油耗影响因素[J]. 北京汽车, 2016,4:38-41.Huang S. Light-duty gasoline vehicles emissions and fuel consumption influencing factors[J]. J. Beijing Automotiue, 2016,4:38-41.
[15] Michelle I. The effects of driving style and vehicle performance on the real-world fuel consumption of U.S. light-duty vehicles[R]. Durham, N H:Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010.
[16] West B H, Mcgill R N, Sluder S. Development and validation of light-duty vehicle modal emissions and fuel consumption values for traffic models[R]. Mclean, V A:Federal Highway Administration, 1999.
[17] 邬建化,程亮,朱本雨.轻型车排放油耗测试影响因素试验研究[J]. 上海汽车, 2017,5:24-32.Wu J H, Cheng L, Zhu B Y. Experimental study on influencing factors of emission fuel consumption test for light vehicles[J]. Shanghai Automotive, 2017,5:24-32.
[18] 潘朋,王建海,田冬莲.轻型车排放测试影响因素试验研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2012,2:48-51.Pan P, Wang J H, Tian D L. An experimental study on the effect factors of the light-duty vehicle emission testing[J]. Automobile Technology, 2012,437(2):48-51.
[19] GB 18352.6-2016轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法(中国第六阶段)[S].GB 18352.6-2016 Limits and measurement methods for emissions from light-duty vehicles (China 6)[S].
[20] GB 18352.5-2013轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法(中国第五阶段)[S].GB 18352.5-2013 Limits and measurement methods for emissions from light-duty vehicles (China 5)[S].
[21] United States Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40, Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 86, Subpart B,§86.115-78 EPA dynamometer driving schedules[Z].
[22] WLTP Trace Index Task Force. "Speed trace violations/drive trace index"[Z]. Technical report UN/ECE/WP.29/GRPE/WLTP-IG, 2015.
[23] SAE J 2951-2014. Drive quality evaluation for chassis dynamometer testing[S].
国家环境保护部公益项目(201409021);中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司重点项目(18190213)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |