MRGO-FMBO原位修复砷污染含水层

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1728 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为了探究磁性氧化石墨烯负载铁锰氧化物复合材料（MRGO-FMBO）修复砷污染地下水的可行性，通过一维模拟柱和二维模拟槽实验探讨了MRGO-FMBO在含水层的迁移和分布情况，分析了材料注入浓度和注入速度对其迁移的影响，研究了MRGO-FMBO在注入模拟地下水含水层后反应带的形成及演化过程.结果表明，MRGO-FMBO在饱和多孔介质中迁移性能良好，在设定的浓度范围（1~8g/L）内，升高注入浓度能减少材料在介质中的残留百分比，增强其迁移性能.当注入速度为0.023~0.057cm/s时，存在一个速度临界值，当注入速度小于此值时，改变速度对MRGO-FMBO在含水层中的迁移性影响显著；当注入速度大于此值时，速度不再是影响迁移的主要因素.MRGO-FMBO在注入地下含水层后能够形成稳定的反应带，反应带在20d内对砷的去除效率达到70.6%，在整个反应带的发展过程中可去除7.79mg As.MRGO-FMBO在砷污染含水层原位修复中具有较好的应用前景.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘婉婷
	迟子芳
	胡文华

关键词 ： MRGO-FMBO, 砷, 迁移特征, 原位修复

Abstract：To explore the feasibility of magnetic graphene oxide based Fe-Mn composite oxides (MRGO-FMBO) for remediation of As(III) polluted groundwater, simulation column experiments and two-dimensional sand box experiments were conducted to discuss the migration and distribution of MRGO-FMBO in aquifers. The effects of injection rate and concentration on the migration were explored and the development and evolution of reaction zone after the injection of MRGO-FMBO into the aquifer were studied. MRGO-FMBO presented good mobility in saturated porous media. Within the concentration range set in this study(1~8g/L), higher injection concentration led to better material mobility and less residue in simulated columns. A critical velocity value between 0.023~0.057cm/s existed that the change of injection velocity had a significant impact on the migration when it was under the critical value. However, the velocity was not the main factor affecting migration when the value was higher than the critical velocity. Besides, MRGO-FMBO could form a stable reaction zone after being injected into the underground aquifer with As remediation efficiency of 70.6% in 20days. During the whole development of the reaction zone, 7.79mg of As could be removed totally. Therefore, these results indicated that MRGO-FMBO had a good application prospect in in-situ remediation of arsenic-contaminated aquifers.

Key words： MRGO-FMBO As migration characteristics in-situ remediation

收稿日期: 2020-10-22

PACS:

X523

基金资助:国家重点研发资助项目（2020YFC1806403-2）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（41977158，41772244）

通讯作者: 迟子芳,副教授,chizifang@jlu.edu.cn E-mail: chizifang@jlu.edu.cn

作者简介: 刘婉婷(1995-),女,辽宁阜新人,吉林大学硕士研究生,主要从事污染场地控制与修复方面的研究.

引用本文:

刘婉婷, 迟子芳, 胡文华. MRGO-FMBO原位修复砷污染含水层[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(6): 2698-2705. LIU Wan-ting, CHI Zi-fang, HU Wen-hua. In-situ remediation of arsenic contaminated aquifer by MRGO-FMBO. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2021, 41(6): 2698-2705.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V41/I6/2698

[1]	Raven K P, Jain A, Loeppert R H. Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite:kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998,32(3):344-349.
[2]	Zhang G S, Liu F D, Liu H J, et al. Respective role of Fe and Mn oxide contents for arsenic sorption in iron and manganese binary oxide:an X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014,48(17):10316-10322.
[3]	Lin L N, Qiu W W, Wang D, et al. Arsenic removal in aqueous solution by a novel Fe-Mn modified biochar composite:Characterization and mechanism[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2017,144:514-521.
[4]	Siddiqui S I, Chaudhry S A. Iron oxide and its modified forms as an adsorbent for arsenic removal:A comprehensive recent advancement[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2017,111:592-626.
[5]	Sha T, Hu W H, Dong J, et al. Influence of the structure and composition of Fe-Mn binary oxides on rGO on As(III) removal from aquifers[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2020,88(2):133-144.
[6]	韩建江,李常锁,温春宇,等.乳化纳米铁浆液在含水层中的迁移特征研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(6):2175-2181. Han J J, Li C S, Wen C Y, et al. Transport characteristics of emulsified nanoscale-zero-valent-iron in saturated porous media[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(6):2175-2181.
[7]	李海宁.铁锰复合氧化物/壳聚糖珠吸附材料制备及其去除水中砷、磷的研究[D]. 烟台:烟台大学, 2016. Li H N. Fe-Mn binary oxide impregnated chitosan bead and its arsenic and phosphate adsorption properties[D]. Yantai:Yantai University, 2016.
[8]	林丽娜,黄青,刘仲齐,等.生物炭-铁锰氧化物复合材料制备及去除水体砷(Ⅲ)的性能研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2017,34(2):182-188. Lin L N, Huang Q, Liu Z Q, et al. Preparation of biochar-Ferro manganese oxide composite material and properties of removal of arsenic(III) from aqueous solution[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2017,34(2):182-188.
[9]	廉佩佩. Fe3O4-MnO2磁性纳米盘吸附剂的制备及除砷(Ⅲ)效能研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2013. Kang P P. Preparation of Fe3O4-MnO2 magnetic nanoplates and research on its adsorption capacity for arsenite removal[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2013.
[10]	周晓馨.铁锰氧化物/介孔氧化硅复合材料对水中砷的吸附性能及机理研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2018. Zhou X X. Adsorption behavior and mechanism of arsenic on mesoporous silica modified by iron-manganese binary oxide (FeMnOx/SBA-15) from aqueous systems[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2018.
[11]	Shan C, Tong M P. Efficient removal of trace arsenite through oxidation and adsorption by magnetic nanoparticles modified with Fe-Mn binary oxide[J]. Water Research, 2013,47(10):3411-3421.
[12]	任黎明.黄原胶稳定氧化石墨烯负载纳米铁去除地下水中六价铬污染的研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2019. Ren L M. Study on removal of chromium (VI) polluted groundwater using xanthan gum stabilized graphene oxide-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2019.
[13]	Molnar I L, Johnson W P, Gerhard J I. Predicting colloid transport through saturated porous media:A critical review[J]. Water Resources Research, 2015,51(9):6804-6845.
[14]	李卉.蔗糖改性纳米铁原位反应带修复硝基苯污染地下水研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2014. Li H. Study on remediation of nitrobenzene contaminated groundwater with in situ reactive zone of sucrose-modified nano-iron[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2014.
[15]	龙菲.温度对多孔介质中颗粒迁移特性影响的试验研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2016. Long F. Laboratory test on the effect of temperature on particle transport in porous media[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016.
[16]	Zhao X, Liu W, Cai Z Q. An overview of preparation and applications of stabilized zero-valent iron nanoparticles for soil and groundwater remediation[J]. Water Research, 2016,100:245-266.
[17]	殷宪强,孙慧敏,易磊,等.孔隙水流速对胶体在饱和多孔介质中运移的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010,24(5):101-104. Yin X Q, Sun H M, Yi L, et al. Effect of flowrate of pore water on the transport of colloid in saturated porous media[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010,24(5):101-104.
[18]	Strutz T J, Hornbruch G, Dahmke A, et al. Effect of injection velocity and particle concentration on transport of nanoscale zero-valent iron and hydraulic conductivity in saturated porous media[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2016,191:54-65.
[19]	Zhang G S, Liu Y, Wang J Y, et al. Efficient arsenic(III) removal from aqueous solution by a novel nanostructured iron-copper-manganese trimetal oxide[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2020,309:1-8.
[20]	Zhou J S, Zhou X X, Yang K L, et al. Adsorption behavior and mechanism of arsenic on mesoporous silica modified by iron-manganese binary oxide (FeMnOx/SBA-15) from aqueous systems[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020,384:1-11.
[21]	徐方男.新型铁锰氧化物对水体中砷镉吸附性能及机理研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2020. Xu F N. Research on the adsorption performance and mechanism of arsenic and cadmium in water by novel iron and manganese oxides[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2020.
[22]	Phanthasri J, Khamdahsag P, Jutaporn P, et al. Enhancement of arsenite removal using manganese oxide coupled with iron (III) trimesic[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018,427:545-552.
[23]	Bui T H, Kim C, Hong S P, et al. Effective adsorbent for arsenic removal:core/shell structural nano zero-valent iron/manganese oxide[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017,24(31):24235-24242.
[24]	Zheng Q, Hou J T, Hartley W, et al. As(III) adsorption on Fe-Mn binary oxides:Are Fe and Mn oxides synergistic or antagonistic for arsenic removal?[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020,389:1-12.
[25]	曾辉平,王繁烁,于亚萍,等.壳聚糖海藻酸钠铁锰泥吸附剂制备与除As(V)研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(3):1146-1155. Zeng H P, Wang F S, Yu Y P, et al. Preparation of chitosan-alginate adsorbent contained Fe-Mn sludge and its potential for As(V) removal[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(3):1146-1155.
[26]	于冰冰,颜湘华,王兴润,等.不同稳定化材料对废渣中As的固定效果[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(9):3887-3896. Yu B B, Yan X H, Wang X R, et al. Stabilization effects of different materials on arsenic-containing slag[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(9):3887-3896.
[27]	李永奎,祝星,祁先进,等.铜渣与含砷污酸反应行为及除砷机理[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(10):4228-4238. Li Y Q, Zhu X, Qi X J, et al. Reaction behavior of copper slag with waste acid and its arsenic removal mechanism[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(10):4228-4238.
[28]	曾辉平,尹灿,李冬,等.基于铁锰泥的除砷吸附剂性能比较及吸附机理[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(9):3373-3379. Zeng H P, Yin C, Li D, et al. Performance comparison and adsorption mechanism of arsenic removal adsorbents made of backwashing sludge from biofilter for iron and manganese removal[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(9):3373-3379.