Characterization of dissolved organic matter changes during electrolysis of biochemical effluent in printing and dyeing
ZHENG Rui-hao1,2, HUANG Yan3, LIU Zi-feng1,2, WANG Jia-de1,2
1. College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technoloy, Hangzhou 310014, China; 2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Industrial Pollution Microbial Control Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China; 3. Deqing Ecological Environment Monitoring Station, Deqing 313200, China
Abstract：Fluorescence excitation emission matrix (EEM), combined with ultraviolet-visible absorption spectroscopy (UV-vis), infrared spectroscopy (IR) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), were employed to identify the structure and composition of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from the electrolysis process of printing and dyeing biochemical effluent, to reveal the changes in macroscopic water quality indicators COD and BOD. The three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy PARAFAC analysis showed that there were three significant fluorescence peaks of tyrosine (C1), tryptophan (C2) and humic acid (YC3) in printing and dyeing biochemical effluent. At a current density of 15mA/cm2, after a certain period of electrolysis (e.g. 30min), the original fluorescence intensity began to gradually weaken, the maximum fluorescence intensity (Fmax) of C1 and C2 fractions remained the same, and DC3 tryptophan component appeared and reduced Fmax. The B/C ratio of the wastewater increased from 0.27 to 0.42, and the C=C, C=O, C-N and C-O-C structures of the printing and dyeing biochemical tailwater DOM were degraded and the corresponding organic compounds such as olefins, ketones, amines, alcohols, benzenes, halogenated hydrocarbons and esters in the raw water were gradually degraded into small molecule organic acids, alkyl esters, alkanes and other by-products, which is the essential reason for the transformation of fluorophores and the improvement of biochemical properties. The three-dimensional fluorescence visualizes the characteristic spectra of the DOM composition of the electrolysis process, which supports the scientific evaluation of the electrolysis technology and the subsequent traceability of the printing and dyeing biochemical effluent.
郑睿豪, 黄燕, 刘梓锋, 王家德. 印染生化尾水电解过程溶解性有机物变化特性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(12): 5650-5657.
ZHENG Rui-hao, HUANG Yan, LIU Zi-feng, WANG Jia-de. Characterization of dissolved organic matter changes during electrolysis of biochemical effluent in printing and dyeing. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2022, 42(12): 5650-5657.
Samsami S, Mohamadizaniani M, Sarrafzadeh M-H, et al. Recent advances in the treatment of dye-containing wastewater from textile industries:Overview and perspectives[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020,143:138-163.
[2]
Saba B, Kjellerup B V, Christy A D. Eco-friendly bio-electro-degradation of textile dyes wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2021,15:100734.
[3]
Bilińska L, Gmurek M. Novel trends in AOPs for textile wastewater treatment. Enhanced dye by-products removal by catalytic and synergistic actions[J]. Water Resources and Industry, 2021,26:100160.
[4]
吴晓萍,张军,张弓,等.UV/TiO2/H2O2体系对制药废水二级出水的处理特性研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021,41(10):3947-3955. Wu X P, Zhang J, Zhang G, et al. Degradation of the secondary effluents of pharmaceutical wastewater by UV/TiO2/H2O2 process[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2021,41(10):3947-3955.
[5]
Chaplin B P. The Prospect of Electrochemical Technologies Advancing Worldwide Water Treatment[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2019,52(3):596-604.
[6]
Radjenovic J, Sedlak D L. Challenges and Opportunities for Electrochemical Processes as Next-Generation Technologies for the Treatment of Contaminated Water[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015,49(19):11292-11302.
[7]
Zhou Q, Zhou X, Zheng R, et al. Application of lead oxide electrodes in wastewater treatment:A review[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2022,806.
[8]
Salazar-Banda G R, Santos G D O S, Duarte Gonzaga I M, et al. Developments in electrode materials for wastewater treatment[J]. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 2021,26.
[9]
刘梓锋,郑睿豪,周青青,等.b-PbO2和BDD电极处理印染反渗透浓水的性能比较[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022,42(6):2671-2679. Liu Z F, Zheng R H, Zhou Q Q, et al. Performance comparison of b-PbO2 and BDD electrodes for treating reverse osmosis concentrate in printing and dyeing industry[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(6):2671-2679.
[10]
Ramesh K, Gnanamangai B M, Mohanraj R. Investigating techno-economic feasibility of biologically pretreated textile wastewater treatment by electrochemical oxidation process towards zero sludge concept[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(5):106289.
[11]
Zou J, Peng X, Li M, et al. Electrochemical oxidation of COD from real textile wastewaters:Kinetic study and energy consumption[J]. Chemosphere, 2017,171:332-338.
[12]
Wang M, Chen Y. Generation and characterization of DOM in wastewater treatment processes[J]. Chemosphere, 2018,201:96-109.
[13]
Sciscenko I, Arques A, Micó P, et al. Emerging applications of EEM-PARAFAC for water treatment:a concise review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances, 2022,10:100286.
[14]
Komatsu K, Onodera T, Kohzu A, et al. Characterization of dissolved organic matter in wastewater during aerobic, anaerobic, and anoxic treatment processes by molecular size and fluorescence analyses[J]. Water Res, 2020,171:115459.
[15]
Rodriguez-Vidal F J, Garcia-Valverde M, Ortega-Azabache B, et al. Characterization of urban and industrial wastewaters using excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence:Searching for specific fingerprints[J]. J Environ Manage, 2020,263:110396.
[16]
Rodriguez-Vidal F J, Ortega-Azabache B, Gonzalez-Martinez A, et al. Comprehensive characterization of industrial wastewaters using EEM fluorescence, FT-IR and (1) H NMR techniques[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2022,805:150417.
[17]
Wünsch U J, Murphy K R, Stedmon C A. Fluorescence quantum yields of natural organic matter and organic compounds:Implications for the fluorescence-based interpretation of organic matter composition[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2015,2:1-15.
[18]
Zhu R, Yang C, Zhou M, et al. Industrial park wastewater deeply treated and reused by a novel electrochemical oxidation reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015,260:427-433.
[19]
Provenzano M R, D'orazio V, Jerzykiewicz M, et al. Fluorescence behaviour of Zn and Ni complexes of humic acids from different sources[J]. Chemosphere, 2004,55(6):885-892.
[20]
Murphy K R, Stedmon C A, Graeber D, et al. Fluorescence spectroscopy and multi-way techniques. PARAFAC[J]. Analytical Methods, 2013,5(23):6557-6566.
[21]
Kamstrup-Nielsen M H, Johnsen L G, BRO R. Core consistency diagnostic in PARAFAC2[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 2013,27(5):99-105.
[22]
邓阳,冯传平,胡伟武,等.电化学氧化垃圾渗滤液生化出水过程中溶解性有机物形态及可生化性[J]. 环境化学, 2018,37(7):1647-1659. Deng Y, Feng C P, Hu W W, et al. DOM composition and biodegradability of biologically treated landfill leachate during electrochemical oxidation degradation[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018,37(7):1647-1659.
[23]
Feng H, Chen Z, Wang X, et al. Electrochemical advanced oxidation for treating ultrafiltration effluent of a landfill leachate system:Impacts of organics and inorganics and economic evaluation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021,413:127492.
[24]
Cheng C, Wu J, You L, et al. Novel insights into variation of dissolved organic matter during textile wastewater treatment by fluorescence excitation emission matrix[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 335:13-21.
[25]
Li W, Xu Z, Wu Q, et al. Characterization of fluorescent-dissolved organic matter and identification of specific fluorophores in textile effluents[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 22(6):4183-4189.
[26]
Li W T, Xu Z X, Li A M, et al. HPLC/HPSEC-FLD with multi-excitation/emission scan for EEM interpretation and dissolved organic matter analysis[J]. Water Res, 2013,47(3):1246-1256.
[27]
Liu B, Wu J, Cheng C, et al. Identification of textile wastewater in water bodies by fluorescence excitation emission matrix-parallel factor analysis and high-performance size exclusion chromatography[J]. Chemosphere, 2019,216:617-623.
[28]
Yu H, Song Y, Tu X, et al. Assessing removal efficiency of dissolved organic matter in wastewater treatment using fluorescence excitation emission matrices with parallel factor analysis and second derivative synchronous fluorescence[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2013,144:595-601.
[29]
Henderson R K, Baker A, Murphy K R, et al. Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems:a review[J]. Water Res, 2009,43(4):863-881.
[30]
Leiviska T, Nurmesniemi H, Poykio R, et al. Effect of biological wastewater treatment on the molecular weight distribution of soluble organic compounds and on the reduction of BOD, COD and P in pulp and paper mill effluent[J]. Water Res, 2008,42(14):3952-3960.
[31]
Ou G, Hu Q, Nyobe D, et al. Towards deep purification of secondary textile effluent by using a dynamic membrane process:Pilot-scale verification[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2022,814:152699.
[32]
Yuan Y, Ning X-A, Zhang Y, et al. Chlorobenzene levels, component distribution, and ambient severity in wastewater from five textile dyeing wastewater treatment plants[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020,193.
[33]
Kishor R, Purchase D, Saratale G D, et al. Ecotoxicological and health concerns of persistent coloring pollutants of textile industry wastewater and treatment approaches for environmental safety[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021,9(2):105012.
[34]
Lim S J, Park Y-K, Kim H, et al. Selective solvent extraction and quantification of synthetic microfibers in textile laundry wastewater using pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022,434:134653.
[35]
Biju L M, Pooshana V, Kumar P S, et al. Treatment of textile wastewater containing mixed toxic azo dye and chromium (VI) BY haloalkaliphilic bacterial consortium[J]. Chemosphere, 2022,287(Pt 3):132280.
