The IUPR (OBD monitoring frequency) data of 200 in-use China V cars were randomly collected in Beijing. And the characteristic distributions of the IUPR monitoring values were tested by driving four kinds of typical cars on actual road, then the results were compared with experimental tests under New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). The results showed that the catalytic converter and oxygen sensor of OBD system could be monitored for collection vehicle, and the monitoring rates of EGR and secondary oxygen sensor could reach 74% and 91%respectively. At present, 3.9timesignition cycles could meet an IUPR monitoring conditions on average. The IUPR average values for each monitoring items were far greater than the China V limit value of 0.10. However, there were some differences for monitoring value distribution. Catalytic converter and oxygen sensor monitoring rates were both 92%. And the monitoring of the vehicle emissions could be realized basically under indoor NEDC, but the test results on 4 actual road indicated that different vehicles had different IUPR monitoring results for molecule adding 1. OBD system was difficult to achieve effective monitoring of vehicle exhaust emission for the traffic jams and low speed. Therefore, it is necessary to combine the actual conditions in Beijing to further improve the monitoring conditions of the vehicle OBD system, and the effective control of the vehicle emission control system will be achieved in Beijing.
刘俊女, 温溢, 刘宪, 杨正军. 北京地区第五阶段在用轻型车OBD监测频率的特征分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(7): 1974-1980.
LIU Jun-Nü, WEN Yi, LIU Xian, YANG Zheng-Jun. Investigation on OBD monitoring frequency characteristics of China V in-use LDV in Beijing.. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2016, 36(7): 1974-1980.
Guan B, Zhan R, Lin H, et al. Review of the state-of-the-art of exhaust particulate filter technology in internal combustion engines [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015,154: 225-258.
[4]
Supnithadnaporn A, Noonan D S, Samoylov A, et al. Estimated validity and reliability of on-board diagnostics for older vehicles: comparison with remote sensing observations [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2011,61(10):996-1004.
Gardetto E, BagianT, Lindner J. High-mileage study of on-board diagnostic emissions [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2005,55(10):1480-1486.
Mentink P, Nieuwenhof R, Kupper F, et al. Robust emission management strategy to meet real-world emission requirements for HD diesel engines [J]. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2015,8(3):1168-1180.
[13]
Samuel S, Austin L, Morrey D. Automotive test drive cycles for emission measurement and real-world emission levels-a review [J]. Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2002,216(7):555-564.
[14]
Nanjundaswamy H K, Tomazic D, Dahodwala M, Koehler E. Road Map for Addressing Future On-Board-Diagnostic Challenges in Light and Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines [J]. SAE International, 2012,doi:10.4271/2012-01-0895.
[15]
Daniel R, Brooks T, Pates D. Analysis of US and EU Drive Styles to Improve Understanding of Market Usage and the Effects on OBD Monitor IUMPR [J]. SAE Technical Paper, 2009,doi: 10.4271/2009-01-0236.
[16]
?l?zak M. Methodology of operation verification on board diagnostics systems (OBD) in Polish conditions [J]. Journal of KONES, 2004,11(3/4):268-279.