皆伐油松林不同恢复措施下团聚体与球囊霉素分布特征

摘要
图/表
参考文献(35)
相关文章 (13)

全文: PDF (584 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

以未扰动油松林为对照，研究了油松林皆伐后在不同措施下恢复为幼林地、灌木地和撂荒地0~20cm土层团聚体稳定性、团聚体中球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白（GRSP）和有机碳（SOC）含量变化特征.结果表明：与对照相比，幼林地团聚体稳定性显著降低（P<0.05），而灌木地及撂荒地团聚体稳定性显著增加.不同恢复措施团聚体中易提取球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白（EE-GRSP）分布的变化趋势与团聚体稳定性一致，灌木地团聚体中EE-GRSP含量相比对照显著增加且最大.灌木地和撂荒地大团聚体（>250μm）中总量球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白（T-GRSP）含量相比对照显著增加而撂荒地粉黏粒团聚体（<53μm）中T-GRSP含量显著减小.粉黏粒团聚体中EE-GRSP含量普遍大于其他粒径团聚体；微团聚体（53~250μm）中T-GRSP含量普遍大于其他粒径团聚体.相比于其他粒径团聚体，大团聚体中T-GRSP可以更准确的反映土壤碳库的变化，团聚体稳定性更依赖于大团聚GRSP.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	景航
	史君怡
	王国梁
	薛萐
	梁楚涛
	周昊翔

关键词 ：球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白, 团聚体, 皆伐, 土壤有机碳

Abstract：

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the soil aggregate stability, distribution of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) and soil organic carbon (SOC) in different size aggregates from three restoration communities (young plantation land, shrub land and abandoned forestland) after clear-cutting Pinus tabulaeformis plantation, undisturbed Pinus tabulaeformis plantation were control treatment. The results showed that soil aggregates were dominated by macro aggregate (>250μm). Aggregate stability were significantly different among those restoration communities (P<0.05). The soil aggregate stability in young plantation land was significantly lower than that in the control treatment, while the aggregate stability in shrub land and abandoned forestland were significantly higher than those in the control treatment. Content of easily extractable GRSP (EE-GRSP) had similar changes with aggregate stability among all restoration communities; Content of total GRSP (T-GRSP) in shrub land significant higher than that in the control treatment. On the other hand, the content of EE-GRSP in clay-silt aggregate (<53μm) was highest than other size aggregates, while the content of T-GRSP in micro aggregate (53~250μm) was the highest than other size. The aggregate stability significantly varied among restoration communities, and the changes of EE-GRSP content was consistent with aggregate stabilities among restoration communites. Our results indicated content of T-GRSP in macro aggregate was a better index to reflect SOC pool than those in other size aggregates. Moreover, the aggregate stability was mainly depending on the GRSP in macro aggregate.

Key words： glomalin-related soil protein soil aggregates clear-cutting soil organic carbon (SOC)

收稿日期: 2016-12-22

PACS:

X171.1

基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目（41371508，41671513）；国家"十二五"科技支撑课题（2015BAC01B03）

通讯作者: 王国梁,副研究员,glwang@nwsuaf.edu.cn E-mail: glwang@nwsuaf.edu.cn

作者简介: 景航(1991-),男,陕西宝鸡人,西北农林科技大学硕士研究生,主要研究方向为植被恢复与流域管理.

引用本文:

景航, 史君怡, 王国梁, 薛萐, 梁楚涛, 周昊翔. 皆伐油松林不同恢复措施下团聚体与球囊霉素分布特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(8): 3056-3063. JING Hang, SHI Jun-yi, WANG Guo-liang, XUE Sha, LIANG Chu-tao, ZHOU Hao-xiang. Distribution of the glomalin-related soil protein and aggregate fractions in different restoration communities after clear-cutting Pinus tabulaeformis plantation. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2017, 37(8): 3056-3063.

链接本文:

http://manu36.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_zghjkx/CN/ 或 http://manu36.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_zghjkx/CN/Y2017/V37/I8/3056

[1]	Wright S F, Sara F, Upadhyyaya A, et al. Extraction of an abundant and unusual protein from soil and comparison, with hyphal protein of arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi[J]. Soil Science, 1996,161(9):575-586.
[2]	Wright S F, Upadhyyaya A. A survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by hyphae of arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi[J]. Plant and Soil, 1998,198(1):97-107.
[3]	彭思利,申鸿,郭涛.接种丛枝菌根真菌对土壤水稳性团聚体特征的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010,16(3):695-700.
[4]	Rillig M C, Mummey D L. Mycorrhizas and soil structure[J]. New Phytologist, 2006,171(1):41-53.
[5]	Treseder K K, Turner K M. Glomalin in ecosystems[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2007,71(4):1257-1266.
[6]	Bothe H, Turnau K, Regvar M. The potential role of arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi in protecting endangered plants and habitats[J]. Mycorrhiza, 2010,20(7):445-57.
[7]	Matthias C, Rillig M C. Arbuscularmycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2004, 84(4):355-363.
[8]	Roldan A, Salinas J R. Soil sustainability indicators following conservation tillage practices under subtropical maize and bean crops[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2007,93(2):273-282.
[9]	唐宏亮,刘龙,王莉,等.土地利用方式对球囊霉素土层分布的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009,17(6):1137-1142.
[10]	谢靖,唐明.黄土高原紫穗槐丛枝菌根真菌与土壤因子和球囊霉素空间分布的关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012,32(7):1440-1447.
[11]	贺海升,王琼,裴忠雪,等.落叶松人工林球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白与土壤理化性质空间差异特性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(12):3466-3473.
[12]	Tisdall J M, Oades J M. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 1982,33(2):141-163.
[13]	Wright S F, Green V S, Cavigelli M A. Glomalin in aggregate size classes from three different farming systems[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2007,94(2):546-549.
[14]	杜介方,张彬,解宏图,等.不同施肥处理对球囊霉素土壤蛋白含量的影响[J].土壤通报, 2011,42(3):573-577.
[15]	Rillig M C, Wright S F, Eviner V T. The role of arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi and glomalin in soil aggregation:Comparing effects of five plant species[J]. Plant and Soil, 2002,238(2):325-333.
[16]	王建,周紫燕,凌婉婷.球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白的分布及环境功能研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(2):634-642.
[17]	冯欣欣,唐明,龚明贵,等.黄土高原狼牙刺丛枝菌根与球囊霉素的空间分布[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报自然科学版, 2011,39(6):96-102.
[18]	Bedini S, Pellegrino E, Avio E, et al. Changes in soil aggregation and glomalin-related soil protein content as affected by the arbuscularmycorrhizal fungal species Glomusmosseae and Glomusintraradices[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2009, 41(7):1491-1496.
[19]	Nimmo J R, Perkins K S. Aggregate stability and size Distribution[M]. California:Methods of Soil Analysis Part Physical Methods, 2002:317-328.
[20]	Six J, Eilliott E T, Paustian K, et al. Aggregation and soil organic matter accumulation in cultivated and native grassland soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1998,62(5):1367-1377.
[21]	Xie H T, Li J W, Zhang B, et al. Long-term manure amendments reduced soil aggregate stability via redistribution of the glomalin-related soil protein in macro aggregates[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015,5:14687.
[22]	Wright S F, Upadhyaya A, Buyer J S. Comparison of N-linked oligosaccharides of glomalin from arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi and soils by capillary electrophoresis[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1998,30(13):1853-1857.
[23]	张嘉宁.黄土高原典型土地利用类型的土壤质量评价研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2015.
[24]	曾全超,董扬红,李鑫,等.基于Le Bissonnais法对黄土高原森林植被带土壤团聚体及土壤可蚀性特征研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014,22(9):1093-1101.
[25]	段而军,于清.黄土高原中部半湿润丘陵区不同树种林地土壤团聚特征的比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010,38(21):11355-11358.
[26]	Wright S F, Anderson R L. Aggregate stability and glomalin in alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2000,31(3):249-253.
[27]	Dai J, Hu J L, Zhu A N, et al. No tillage enhances arbuscularmycorrhizal fungal population, glomalin-related soil protein content, and organic carbon accumulation in soil macroaggregates[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15(5):1055-1062.
[28]	Lovelock C E, Wright S F, Clark D A, et al. Soil stocks of glomalin produced by arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi across a tropical rain forest landscape[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2004,92(2):278-287.
[29]	白淑兰,白玉娥,方亮,等.土生空团菌与虎榛子形成的菌根及其对虎榛子生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2004,40(6):194-196.
[30]	Rillig M C, Wright S F, Nichols K A, et al. Large contribution of arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon pools in tropical forest soils[J]. Plant and Soil, 2001,233(2):167-177.
[31]	宇万太,姜子绍,李新宇,等.不同土地利用方式对潮棕壤有机碳含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007,18(12):2760-2764.
[32]	霍莉莉,吕宪国.垦殖方式对小叶章湿地表土团聚体有机碳分布的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011,31(10):1711-1717.
[33]	Rillig M C, Maestre F T, Lamit L J. Microsite differences in fungal hyphal length, glomalin, and soil aggregate stability in semiarid Mediterranean stepps[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2003,35(9):1257-1260.
[34]	Spohn M, Giani L. Water-stable aggregates, glomalin-related soil protein, and carbohydrates in a chronosequence of sandy hydromorphic soils[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2010,42(9):1505-1511.
[35]	Wu Q S, He X H, Cao M Q, et al. Relationships between glomalin-related soil protein in water-stable aggregate fractions and aggregate stability in citrus rhizosphere[J]. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 2013,15(3):603-606.