Studies on screening and list of priority pollutants in China's soil criteria research
GE Feng1,2, XU Ke-ke1,2, YUN Jing-jing1,2, HE Yue1,2, ZHANG Xiao-yan1,2, XU Lin-yue1,2, ZHANG Ming-zhu1,2, WANG Ning1,2
1. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Nanjing 210042, China;
2. Nanjing Guohuan Institute of Environmental Research CO. LTD, Nanjing 210042, China
Based on methods for screening priority pollutants available in China and other countries, this paper comprehensively reviews pollutants lists and relevant literature, establishes the procedures and principles for screening priority pollutants based on the soil environmental criteria of China and makes a list of the priority pollutants identified through these procedures. The results indicate the following priority pollutants based on the soil environmental criteria of China:DDT, cadmium, benzo[a]pyrene, lead, polychlorinated biphenyl, arsenic and chromium mercury. It is recommended that the future soil environmental criteria of China should be developed on the basis of priority pollutants, and that well-targeted research should be conducted with an overall consideration of the protected objects of soil environmental criteria, demands of social development, and technological development level.
Otte, P, Lijzen, J P A, Otte J G, et al. Evaluation and revision of the CSOIL parameter set:proposed parameter set for human exposure modelling and deriving Intervention Values for the first series of compouds[R]. Dutch:RIVM, 2001.
[7]
Canada C E. Review and recommendations for Canadian interim environmental quality criteria for contaminated sites[J]. Environment Canada Scientific, 1991:197.
[8]
CCME.A protocol for the derivation of environmental and human health soil quality guidelines[EB/OL]. https://www.ccme.ca/files/Resources/supporting_scientific_documents/sg_protocol_1332_e.pdf.
Cao H C, Luan Z Q, Wang J D, et al. Potential ecological risk of cadmium, lead and arsenic in agricultural black soil in Jilin Province, China[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research & Risk Assessment, 2009,23(1):57-64.
[18]
Lu J H, Yang X P, Meng X C, et al.Predicting cadmium safety thresholds in soils based on cadmium uptake by Chinese cabbage[J]. Pedosphere, 2017,27(3):475-481.
[19]
Ding C F, Ma Y B, Li X G, et al.Determination and validation of soil thresholds for cadmium based on food quality standard and health risk assessment[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2017,619-620:700-706.
Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan. Methods for the risk assessment of priority assessment chemical substances[EB/OL]. http://www.env.go.jp/en/chemi/chemicals/assessment_chemical_substances.pdf.
[22]
E M, Snyder, S A, Snyder, J P, Giesy, S A, Blonde, G K, Hurlburt, C L, Summer, R R, Mitchell, D M, Bush. Scram:a scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part I:structure of the scoring and ranking system[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2000,7(1):52-61.
[23]
Haelst A G V, Hansen B G.Priority setting for existing chemicals:Automated data selection routine[J]. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, 2010,19(9):2372-2377.
Greim H, Ahlers J, Bias R, et al.Priority setting for the evaluation of existing chemicals the approach of the German advisory committee on existing chemicals of environmental relevance(BUA)[J].Chemosphere, 1993,26(9):1653-1666.
[30]
Swanson M B, Davis G A, Kincaid L E, et al.A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts[J]. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, 1997,16(2):372-383.
[31]
Ian Martin C C. Compilation of data for priority organic pollutants for derivation of soil guideline values[R]. U K:Environment Agency, 2008.
[32]
CCME. Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for Barium:Protection of Human Health Scientific Criteria Document[R]. Canadian:CCME, 2013.
Vaidya O S, Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process:An overview of applications[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 169(1):1-29.
[51]
Council T. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy[J]. Official Journal, 2000,22(22).
[52]
Carlon C, D'Alessandro M, Swartjes F. Derivation methods of soil screening values in Europe:a review and evaluation of national procedures towards harmonization[R]. Europe:International organization-network or project, 2007.
[53]
Elzen M D, Berk M, Faber A, et al. FAIR 1.0(Framework to Assess International Regimes for differentiation of commitments):an interactive model to explore options for differentiation of future commitments in international climate policy making[R]. Dutch:CCME, 2001.
Daprile L, Tatano F, Musmeci L. Development of quality objectives for contaminated sites:state of the art and new perspectives[J]. International Journal of Environment & Health, 2007,1(1):120-141.
[56]
Donald Machay, Wan-ying Shiu, Kuo-ching Ma, et al. Handbook of physicalchemical properties and environmental fate for organic chemicals[M]. New York:CRC Press, 2006.
[57]
SOMSDS.化学品MSDS[EB/OL]. http://www.somsds.com/.
[58]
U.S.EPA. Integrated Risk Information System[EB/OL]. https://www.epa.gov/iris.
[59]
U.S.National Center for Biotechnology Information[EB/OL]. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
[60]
U.S.National Library of Medicine[EB/OL]. https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/.
[61]
US.EPA and ATSDR. The ATSDR 2017 substance priority list[EB/OL]. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/.
[62]
European commission. Priority substances under the water framework directive[EB/OL]. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-dangersub/pri_substances.htm#list.
[63]
Government of Canada, Canadian environmental protection. Act priority substances list[EB/OL]. https://www.canada.ca/en/sr/srb.html?cdn=canada&st=s&num=10&langs=en&st1rt=1&s5bm3ts21rch=x&q=Priority+Substances+List+Assessment+Report&_charset_=UTF-8&wb-srch-sub=.
UK. Environment Agency. Soil Screening values for use in UK ecological risk assessment[EB/OL]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/657723/Soil_screening_values_for_assessing_ecological_risk_-_report.pdf.
[66]
CCME. Canadian environmental quality guidelines summary table[EB/OL]. http://st-ts.ccme.ca/en/index.html.
[67]
RIVM. Proposal for intervention values soil and groundwater for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th series of compounds[EB/OL]. https://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=0c3f8229-8459-4c57-9e7f-773e2f9cef7e&type=org&disposition=inline.
[68]
U.S. ATSDR. Toxic substances portal[EB/OL]. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/.
