Effects of river basin horizontal ecological compensation on water environment benefits
HU Dong-bin1, LIN Mei1, CHEN Xiao-hong1,2
1. School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; 2. School of Frontier Crossover Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China
Abstract：Based on the panel data of 26 prefecture-level cities in Zhejiang and Anhui provinces from 2000 to 2019, this paper uses the synthetic control method to quantitatively analyze the overall and structural impacts of the three-round horizontal ecological compensation pilots’ policy on the Xin'an River basin on its water environmental benefits. The results showed that: (1) there existed temporal heterogeneity in policy effects. The first and second rounds of policy pilots significantly improved the overall water environment of the Xin'an River Basin, while the third round of pilots had a negative impact on the upstream water environment. (2) there existed spatial heterogeneity in policy effects. The horizontal ecological compensation policy of the river basin increased the biodiversity value of the downstream by an average of 6.8 million yuan, but reduced the biodiversity value of the upstream by an average of 1.5 million yuan. (3) there existed structural heterogeneity in policy effects. Structural decomposition of water environmental benefits showed that the horizontal ecological compensation policy increased the value of water purification capacity in the Xin'an River Basin by an average of 3.1874 billion yuan, but reduced the value of its product supply by an average of 1.3402 billion yuan. (4) there existed expected benefits in policy effects. The effect of the horizontal ecological compensation policy has appeared two years ahead the official implementation of the policy.
胡东滨, 林媚, 陈晓红. 流域横向生态补偿政策的水环境效益评估[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(11): 5447-5456.
HU Dong-bin, LIN Mei, CHEN Xiao-hong. Effects of river basin horizontal ecological compensation on water environment benefits. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2022, 42(11): 5447-5456.
饶清华,林秀珠,陈芳,等.基于排污量分配的流域生态补偿标准研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022,42(6):2828-2834. Rao Q H, Lin X Z, Chen F, et al. Research on the ecological compensation standard for river basin based on pollutant allocation[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(6):2828-2834.
[2]
饶清华,邱宇,王菲凤,等.闽江流域跨界生态补偿量化研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013,33(10):1897-1903. Rao Q H, Qiu Y, Wang F F, et al. Quantification of trans-regional eco-compensation in Minjiang River Basin[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013,33(10):1897-1903.
[3]
张捷,莫扬."科斯范式"与"庇古范式"可以融合吗?——中国跨省流域横向生态补偿试点的制度分析[J]. 制度经济学研究, 2018, (3):23-44. Zhang J, M Y. The Coase Theorem and the Pigovian Tax can be integrated? An institutional analysis on pilot programs of inter-province ecological compensation in Chinese watersheds[J]. Research of Institutional Economics, 2018,(3):23-44.
[4]
刘聪,张宁.新安江流域横向生态补偿的经济效应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021,41(4):1940-1948. Liu C, Zhang N. Study on the economic effects of Xin'an river basin horizontal ecological compensation[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(4):1940-1948.
[5]
中共中央国务院.生态文明体制改革总体方案[R]. 北京:中共中央国务院, 2017. The Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council. Integrated reform plan for promoting ecological progress[R]. Beijing:The Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council, 2017.
[6]
国务院办公厅.关于健全生态保护补偿机制的意见[R]. 北京:国务院办公厅, 2016. General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Opinions on improving the ecological protection compensation mechanism[R]. Beijing:General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, 2016.
[7]
财政部,等.支持长江全流域建立横向生态保护补偿机制的实施方案[R]. 北京:财政部等, 2021. Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China. Implementation plan for supporting the establishment of horizontal ecological protection compensation mechanism in the Whole Yangtze River Basin[R]. Beijing:Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China, 2021.
[8]
沈满洪,谢慧明.跨界流域生态补偿的"新安江模式"及可持续制度安排[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020,30(9):156-163. Shen M H,Xie H. Transboundary ecological compensation in the Xin'an River Basin and its institutional arrangement of sustainability[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020,30(9):156-163.
[9]
王雨蓉,陈利根,陈歆,等.制度分析与发展框架下流域生态补偿的应用规则:基于新安江的实践[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(1):41-48. Wang Y R, Chen L G, Chen Xin, et al. Rules-in-use in payments for watershed services under IAD framework:a case study based on Xin'an River's practices[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020,30(1):41-48.
[10]
胡振华,刘景月,钟美瑞,等.基于演化博弈的跨界流域生态补偿利益均衡分析——以漓江流域为例[J]. 经济地理, 2016,36(6):42-49. Hu Z H, Liu J Y, Zhong M R, et al. Interests balance of trans-boundary river basin ecological compensation based on evolutionary game theory:Taking Lijiang Basin as a case[J]. Economic Geograph, 2016,36(6):42-49.
[11]
Jiang K, Zhang X, Wang Y. Stability and influencing factors when designing incentive-compatible payments for watershed services:Insights from the Xin'an River Basin, China[J]. Marine Policy, 2021, 134:104824.
[12]
王雨蓉,曾庆敏,陈利根,等.基于IAD框架的国外流域生态补偿制度规则与启示[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(5):2086-2096. Wang Y R, Zeng Q M, Chen L G, et al. Rules in payments for watershed services abroad based on IAD framework and its enlightenments to China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(5):2086-2096.
[13]
Lin Y, Dong Z, Zhang W, et al. Estimating inter-regional payments for ecosystem services:Taking China's Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region as an example[J]. Ecological Economics, 2020,168:106514.
[14]
曾贤刚,刘纪新,段存儒,等.基于生态系统服务的市场化生态补偿机制研究——以五马河流域为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(12):4755-4763. Zeng X G, Liu J X, Duan C R, et al. A study on market-oriented ecological compensation for the ecosystem services based on Wuma River Watershed[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(12):4755-4763.
[15]
Von Thaden J, Manson R H, Congalton R G, et al. Evaluating the environmental effectiveness of payments for hydrological services in Veracruz, México:A landscape approach[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 100:105055.
[16]
李冬花,张晓瑶,王咏,等.新安江流域生态系统服务演化过程及权衡协同关系[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(17):6981-6993. Li D H, Zhang X Y, Wang Y, et al. Evolution process of ecosystem services and the trade-off synergy in Xin'an River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(17):6981-6993.
[17]
张晖,吴霜,张燕媛,等.流域生态补偿政策对受偿地区经济增长的影响研究——以安徽省黄山市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019,28(12):2848-2856. Zhang H, Wu S, Zhang Y Y, et al. Effect of watershed eco-compensation mechanism on economic growth in compensation area:Take Huangshan City as an example[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019,28(12):2848-2856.
[18]
Jones K W, Mayer A, Von Thaden J, et al. Measuring the net benefits of payments for hydrological services programs in Mexico[J]. Ecological Economics, 2020,175:106666.
[19]
Grillos T, Bottazzi P, Crespo D, et al. In-kind conservation payments crowd in environmental values and increase support for government intervention:A randomized trial in Bolivia[J]. Ecological Economics, 2019,166:106404.
[20]
Lehtoranta V, Louhi P. Does conservation in Natura 2000areas promote water quality improvement? Findings from a contingent valuation study on environmental benefits and residents' preferences[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2021,124:226-234.
[21]
Brownson K, Fowler L. Evaluating how we evaluate success:Monitoring, evaluation and adaptive management in payments for watershed services programs[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020,94:104505.
[22]
Sheng J, Han X. Practicing policy mobility of payment for ecosystem services through assemblage and performativity:Lessons from China's Xin'an River Basin eco-compensation pilot[J]. Ecological Economics, 2022,191:107234.
[23]
Diswandi D. A hybrid Coasean and Pigouvian approach to payment for ecosystem services program in West Lombok:Does it contribute to poverty alleviation?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,23:138-145.
[24]
Chen C, Matzdorf B, Zhen L, et al. Social-Network Analysis of local governance models for China's eco-compensation program[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020,45:101191.
[25]
Aguilar F X, Obeng E A, Cai Z. Water quality improvements elicit consistent willingness-to-pay for the enhancement of forested watershed ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,30:158-171.
[26]
Li C, Shi Y, Ni Q, et al. Effects of social interactions and information bias on the willingness to pay for transboundary basin ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021,296:113233.
[27]
朱仁显,李佩姿.跨区流域生态补偿如何实现横向协同?——基于13个流域生态补偿案例的定性比较分析[J]. 公共行政评论, 2021, 14(1):170-190+224-225. Zhu R X, Li P Z. How to achieve horizontal coordination of cross-regional river basin ecological compensation:A qualitative comparative analysis of 13 watershed ecological compensation cases[J]. Journal of Public Administration, 2021,14(1):170-190,224-225.
[28]
景守武,张捷.新安江流域横向生态补偿降低水污染强度了吗?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018,28(10):152-159. Jing S W, Zhang J. Can Xin'anjiang river basin horizontal ecological compensation reduce the intensity of water pollution?[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018,28(10):152-159.
[29]
李彩红,葛颜祥.流域双向生态补偿综合效益评估研究——以山东省小清河流域为例[J]. 山东社会科学, 2019,(12):85-90. Li C H, Ge Y X. Study on comprehensive benefit evaluation of two-way ecological compensation in the river basin:A case study of Xiaoqing River Basin in Shandong Province[J]. Shandong Social Sciences, 2019,(12):85-90.
[30]
王慧杰,毕粉粉,董战峰.基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的新安江流域生态补偿政策绩效评估[J]. 生态学报, 2020,40(20):7493-7506. Wang H J, Bi F F, Dong Z F. Evaluation of ecological compensation policy for Xin'an River Basin based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(20):7493-7506.
[31]
Immerzeel W, Stoorvogel J, Antle J. Can payments for ecosystem services secure the water tower of Tibet?[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2008,96(1):52-63.
[32]
Zeng Q, Brouwer R, Wang Y, et al. Measuring the incremental impact of payments for watershed services on water quality in a transboundary river basin in China[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2021, 51:101355.
[33]
Salzman J. Creating markets for ecosystem services:Notes from the field[J]. New York University Law Review, 2005,80:92.
[34]
Bösch M, Elsasser P, Wunder S. Why do payments for watershed services emerge? A cross-country analysis of adoption contexts[J]. World Development, 2019,119:111-119.
[35]
景守武,张捷.跨界流域横向生态补偿与企业全要素生产率[J]. 财经研究, 2021,47(5):139-152. Jing S W, Zhang J. Trans-provincial basin horizontal ecological compensation and enterprise Total factor productivity[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2021,47(5):139-152.
[36]
娜仁,陈艺,万伦来,等.中国典型流域生态补偿财政支出的减贫效应研究——来自2010~2017年安徽新安江流域的经验数据[J]. 财政研究, 2020,(5):51-62. Na R, Chen Y, Wan L L, et al. Research on the poverty reduction effect of fiscal expenditure of ecological compensation in Typical River Basins of China:Empirical data from Xin'an River Basin, Anhui Province from 2010to 2017[J]. Public Finance Research, 2020, (5):51-62.
[37]
Tacconi L. Redefining payments for environmental services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012,73:29-36.
[38]
Aguilar-Gómez C R, Arteaga-Reyes T T, Gómez-Demetrio W, et al. Differentiated payments for environmental services:A review of the literature[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020,44:101131.
[39]
石晓然,张彩霞,殷克东.中国沿海省市海洋生态补偿效率评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(7):3204-3215. Shi X R, Zhang C X, Yin K D. Evaluation of marine ecological compensation efficiency in coastal provinces and cities of China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(7):3204-3215.
[40]
生态环境部.新安江流域水环境补偿试点实施方案[R]. 北京:生态环境部, 2012. Ministry of Ecological Environment of the People's Republic of China. Pilot implementation plan for water environment compensation in Xin'an Jiang River Basin[R]. Beijing:Ministry of Ecological Environment of the People's Republic of China, 2012.
[41]
安徽省人民政府,浙江省人民政府.关于新安江流域上下游横向生态补偿的协议[R]. 安徽浙江:安徽省人民政府,浙江省人民政府, 2018. Anhui Provincial People's Government,Zhejiang Provincial People's Government. Agreement on horizontal ecological compensation in upstream and downstream of Xin'an Jiang River Basin[R]. Ahui and Zhejiang:Anhui Provincial People's Government and Zhejiang Provincial People's Government, 2018.
[42]
Alberto Abadie. Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2003,113(2):231-263.
[43]
Alberto Abadie, Alexis Diamond, Jens Hainmueller. Synthetic Control Methods for comparative case studies:Estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program[J]. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 2010,105(490):493-505.
[44]
刘友金,曾小明.房产税对产业转移的影响:来自重庆和上海的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018,(11):98-116. Liu Y J, Zeng X M. Research on the influence of industrial transfer from the property taxes:Empirical research from Chongqing and Shanghai[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018,(11):98-116.
[45]
Almer C, Winkler R. Analyzing the effectiveness of international environmental policies:The case of the Kyoto Protocol[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2017,82:125-151.
[46]
Costanza R, Limburg K, Naeem S, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387:253-260.
[47]
谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015,37(9):1740-1746. Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang C S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(9):1740-1746.
[48]
谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(8):1243-1254. Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[49]
昝欣,张玉玲,贾晓宇,等.永定河上游流域水生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020,35(6):1326-1337. Zan X, Zhang Y L, Jia X Y, et al. Evaluation on the ecosystem services value of the upper reaches of Yongding River[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(6):1326-1337.
[50]
马庆华.流域生态补偿政策实施效果评价方法及案例研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2015. Ma Q H. Research on evaluation methods and case studies for watershed ecological compensation[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2015.
[51]
GB 3838-2002地表水环境质量标准[S]. GB 3838-2002 Environmental quality standards for surface water[R].
[52]
欧阳志云,朱春全,杨广斌,等.生态系统生产总值核算:概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(21):6747-6761. Ouyang Z Y, Zhu C Q, Yang G B, et al. Gross ecosystem product:concept, accounting framework and case study[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(21):6747-6761.
[53]
汪为青.鄱阳湖湿地生态系统服务价值与退田还湖生态补偿研究[D]. 南昌:江西师范大学, 2009. Wang W Q. Study on Poyang Lake wetland ecosystem services value and eco-compensation of the returning field in lakeside areas to Poyang Lake[D]. Nanchang:Jiangxi Normal University, 2009.
[54]
赵同谦,欧阳志云,王效科,等.中国陆地地表水生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003,(4):443-452. Zhao T Q, OUYang Z Y, Wang X K, et al. Ecosystem services and their valuation of terrestrial surface water system in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003,(4):443-452.
[55]
浙江省环境保护厅.千岛湖饮用水源专项整治规划[R]. 杭州:浙江省环境保护厅, 2009. Zhejiang Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment. Special improvement plan for drinking water sources in Qiandao Lake[R]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment, 2009.
[56]
王奕淇,李国平,延步青.流域生态服务价值横向补偿分摊研究[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(6):1013-1023. Wang Y Q, Li G P, Yan B Q. Sharing of watershed ecosystem service value horizontal compensation burden by downstream cities[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(6):1013-1023.
[57]
Shang W, Gong Y, Wang Z, et al. Eco-compensation in China:Theory, practices and suggestions for the future[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018,210:162-170.
[58]
全国政协.关于千岛湖水资源保护情况的调研报告[R]. 北京:全国政协, 2010. National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. Investigation report on the protection of water resources in Qiandao Lake[R]. Beijing:National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, 2010.
[59]
浙江省委.关于推进生态文明建设的决定[R]. 杭州:浙江省委, 2010. The CPC Zhejiang Provincial Committee. Decision on promoting the ecological civilization[R]. Hangzhou:The CPC Zhejiang Provincial Committee, 2010.
[60]
杭州市人民政府.杭州市生态文明建设规划[R]. 杭州:杭州市人民政府, 2011. Hangzhou Municipal People's Government. Hangzhou ecological conservation plan[R]. Hangzhou:Hangzhou Municipal People's Government, 2011.
[61]
杭州市人民政府.生态文明建设三年行动方案[R]. 杭州:杭州市人民政府, 2011. Hangzhou Municipal People's Government. Three-year action plan for ecologicalconservation[R]. Hangzhou:Hangzhou Municipal People's Government, 2011.
