提高污泥含固率对高温厌氧消化互营产甲烷影响

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (6)

全文: PDF (1181 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要以常规含固率(2%)剩余污泥高温厌氧消化排泥为接种污泥,分析接种污泥在不同氨浓度下厌氧消化各步骤的动力学速率变化,并以热水解预处理的高含固污泥(10%)为基质进行连续试验,探讨高温厌氧消化条件下基质由常规含固率快速切换至高含固率的产甲烷性能变化.结果表明,随着氨浓度上升,接种污泥对乙酸、丙酸、丁酸和热水解污泥的比产甲烷活性均有所下降,但其氢利用速率和互营乙酸氧化速率未受到显著影响.高温厌氧消化基质含固率由2%切换至10%连续运行试验结果表明,在有机负荷高达14g COD/(L·d)时,虽然系统COD去除率不足(27.99±3.66)%,且存在VFAs积累(10.41±2.25)g COD/L,但pH值仍可稳定在(7.74±0.09),说明该切换策略具有可行性.稳定运行系统中产氢产乙酸和互营乙酸氧化功能菌属以Coprothermobacter(15.29%)、Anaerobaculum(8.89%)、Tepidimicrobium(17.99%)和Syntrophomonas(1.60%)为主,切换后乙酸营养型产甲烷菌Methanothrix被淘汰,而参与互营乙酸氧化过程的Methanosarcina和Methanothermobacter相对丰度显著提高,说明体系通过构建互营乙酸氧化产甲烷途径来抵御高温高氨的环境胁迫.因此,以常规含固率高温厌氧消化污泥作为接种泥是实现由常规含固率切换至高含固热水解-高温厌氧消化的有效策略,并且接种污泥的互营乙酸氧化活性是切换成功的关键因素.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	朱俊兆
	卓杨
	华飞虎
	周梦雨
	王雪娜
	刘金洋
	韩芸

关键词 ：高含固污泥, 高温厌氧消化, 热水解预处理, 互营乙酸氧化, 氨抑制

Abstract：This study investigated the kinetic rate variations of each stage involved in anaerobic digestion under different ammonia loadings, in this process, the inoculated sludge was obtained from a thermophilic anaerobic digestion system with solid content of 2%. Furthermore, effects of the quick switch between low solid content (2%) and high solid content (10%) on methane production potentials were explored through feeding thermal hydrolyzed sludge to a continuous flow model. Results showed that with ammonia loading increasing, the specific methanogenic activities of typical substrates like acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and thermal hydrolyzed sludge were all decreased, while the hydrogen utilization rates (HUR) and syntrophic acetate oxidation (SAO) rates were not significantly affected. With continuous flow model, although the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal ratio was insufficient (27.99±3.66)% and the VFAs accumulation (10.41±2.25) g COD/L was observed when the organic loading reached 14g COD/(L·d), the pH values remained stable at (7.74±0.09). This result suggested that this switching strategy was feasible in achieving stable operating condition. The predominant hydrogen-producing acetogen and syntrophic acetate oxidizing functional genera were Coprothermobacter (15.29%), Anaerobaculum (8.89%), Tepidimicrobium (17.99%), and Syntrophomonas (1.60%) at stable stage. Moreover, Methanothrix, acetoclastic methanogen, was eliminated, while Methanosarcina and Methanothermobacter, being involved in the syntrophic acetate oxidation process, was significantly enriched. It can be concluded that the above anaerobic digestion system resists the environmental stress of high temperature and ammonia through establishing syntrophic acetate oxidation coupled with hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis (SAO-HM) pathway. Overall, using conventional thermophilic anaerobic digestion sludge as the inoculated sludge is an effective strategy to achieve switching from conventional solid content to high solid thermal hydrolysis pretreatment following thermophilic anaerobic digestion (THP-TAD), and the syntrophic acetate oxidation activity of the inoculated sludge is the key factor for this successful switch.

Key words： high solid sludge thermophilic anaerobic digestion thermal hydrolysis pretreatment syntrophic acetate oxidation ammonia inhibition

收稿日期: 2023-02-19

PACS:

X703

基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目(52070153)；国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(52200175)；陕西省自然科学基础研究计划资助项目(项目编号2022JQ-445)

通讯作者: 韩芸,教授,hanyun@xauat.edu.cn E-mail: hanyun@xauat.edu.cn

作者简介: 朱俊兆(1998-),男,陕西西安人,西安建筑科技大学硕士研究生,主要研究方向为城市污水厂污泥处理与处置.17342947626@163.com

引用本文:

朱俊兆, 卓杨, 华飞虎, 周梦雨, 王雪娜, 刘金洋, 韩芸. 提高污泥含固率对高温厌氧消化互营产甲烷影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023, 43(9): 4697-4707. ZHU Jun-zhao, ZHUO Yang, HUA Fei-hu, ZHOU Meng-yu, WANG Xue-na, LIU Jin-yang, HAN Yun. Effects of the increased solid content of waste activated sludge on syntrophic acetate oxidation for methane production through thermophilic anaerobic digestion. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2023, 43(9): 4697-4707.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V43/I9/4697

[1]	董滨,高君,陈思思,等.我国剩余污泥厌氧消化的主要影响因素及强化[J]. 环境科学, 2020,41(7):3384-3391. Dong B, Gao J, Chen S S, et al. Main Influencing Factors and Strengthening of Anaerobic Transformation of Excess Sludge in China[J]. Environmental Science, 2020,41(7):3384-3391.
[2]	Liao X, Li H, Cheng Y, et al. Process performance of high-solids batch anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge[J]. Environmental Technology, 2014,35(21):2652-2659.
[3]	戴晓虎.我国污泥处理处置现状及发展趋势[J]. 科学, 2020,72(6):30-34. Dai X H. Status quo and development trend of sludge treatment and disposal in China[J]. Science, 2020,72(6):30-34.
[4]	Han D, Lee C Y, Chang S W, et al. Enhanced methane production and wastewater sludge stabilization of a continuous full-scale thermal pretreatment and thermophilic anaerobic digestion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017,245(Pt A):1162-1167.
[5]	Zhuo Y, Han Y, Qu Q, et al. Pre-separation of ammonium content during high solid thermal-alkaline pretreatment to mitigate ammonia inhibition:Kinetics and feasibility analysis[J]. Water Research, 2018, 139:363-371.
[6]	Westerholm M, Moestedt J, Schnürer A. Biogas production through syntrophic acetate oxidation and deliberate operating strategies for improved digester performance[J]. Applied Energy, 2016,179:124-135.
[7]	Dyksma S, Jansen L, Gallert C. Syntrophic acetate oxidation replaces acetoclastic methanogenesis during thermophilic digestion of biowaste[J]. Microbiome, 2020,8(1):105.
[8]	Pan P, Hong B, Mbadinga S M, et al. Iron oxides alter methanogenic pathways of acetate in production water of high-temperature petroleum reservoir[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2017,101(18):7053-7063.
[9]	Schnürer A, Nordberg Å. Ammonia, a selective agent for methane production by syntrophic acetate oxidation at mesophilic temperature[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2008,57(5):735-740.
[10]	Wang H, Fotidis I A, Angelidaki I. Ammonia effect on hydrogenotrophic methanogens and syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria[J]. FEMS microbiology ecology, 2015,91(11):fiv130.
[11]	Hao L P, Lü F, He P J, et al. Predominant Contribution of Syntrophic Acetate Oxidation to Thermophilic Methane Formation at High Acetate Concentrations[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011,45(2):508-513.
[12]	Werner J J, Garcia M L, Perkins S D, et al. Microbial community dynamics and stability during an ammonia-induced shift to syntrophic acetate oxidation[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2014, 80(11):3375-3383.
[13]	Hou Y, Peng D, Xue X, et al. Hydrogen utilization rate:A crucial indicator for anaerobic digestion process evaluation and monitoring[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2014,117(4):519-523.
[14]	Anderson G K, Yang G. Determination of bicarbonate and total volatile acid concentration in anaerobic digesters using a simple titration[J]. Water Environment Research, 1992,64(1):53-59.
[15]	Hansen K H, Angelidaki I, Ahring B K. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure:inhibition by ammonia[J]. Water Research, 1998,32(1):5-12.
[16]	Lu D, Sun F, Zhou Y. Insights into anaerobic transformation of key dissolved organic matters produced by thermal hydrolysis sludge pretreatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018,266:60-67.
[17]	Barredo M S, Evison L M. Effect of propionate toxicity on methanogen-enriched sludge, Methanobrevibacter smithii, and Methanospirillum hungatii at different pH values[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1991,57(6):1764-1769.
[18]	Ahring B K, Westermann P. Kinetics of butyrate, acetate, and hydrogen metabolism in a thermophilic, anaerobic, butyrate-degrading triculture[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1987,53(2):434-439.
[19]	Chen Y, Cheng J J, Creamer K S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process:A review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008,99(10):4044-4064.
[20]	Schnürer A, Zellner G, Svensson B H. Mesophilic syntrophic acetate oxidation during methane formation in biogas reactors[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 1999,29(3):249-261.
[21]	Chen Z, Li W, Qin W, et al. Long-term performance and microbial community characteristics of pilot-scale anaerobic reactors for thermal hydrolyzed sludge digestion under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,720:137566.
[22]	Tian H, Yan M, Treu L, et al. Hydrogenotrophic methanogens are the key for a successful bioaugmentation to alleviate ammonia inhibition in thermophilic anaerobic digesters[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 293:122070.
[23]	彭韵,李蕾,伍迪,等.微生物群落对氨胁迫响应的宏基因组学研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022,42(2):777-786. Peng Y, Li L,Wu D, et al. Metagenomic analysis on the responses of microbial community to ammonia stress[J] China Environmental Science, 2022,42(2):777-786.
[24]	Balk M, Weijma J, Stams A J M. Thermotoga lettingae sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, methanol-degrading bacterium isolated from a thermophilic anaerobic reactor[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2002,52(4):1361-1368.
[25]	Hattori S, Kamagata Y, Hanada S, et al. Thermacetogenium phaeum gen. nov., sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic, thermophilic, syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacterium[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2000,50(4):1601-1609.
[26]	Hadiyarto A, Budiyono B, Djohari S, et al. The effect of F/M ratio to the anaerobic decomposition of biogas production from fish offal waste[J]. Waste Technology, 2015,3(2):58-61.
[27]	Wu L J, Li X X, Liu Y X, et al. Optimization of hydrothermal pretreatment conditions for mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of high-solid sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021,321(September 2020):124454.
[28]	Angelidaki I, Karakashev D, Batstone D J, et al. Chapter sixteen Biomethanation and Its Potential[J]. Methods in Enzymology, 2011, 494:327-351.
[29]	Kim D H, Oh S E. Continuous high-solids anaerobic co-digestion of organic solid wastes under mesophilic conditions[J]. Waste Management, 2011,31(9/10):1943-1948.
[30]	Calli B, Mertoglu B, Inanc B, et al. Effects of high free ammonia concentrations on the performances of anaerobic bioreactors[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2005,40(3/4):1285-1292.
[31]	戴晓虎,何进,严寒,等.游离氨调控对污泥高含固厌氧消化反应器性能的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2017,38(2):679-687. Dai X H, He J, Yan H, et al. Effects of free ammonia regulation on the performance of high solid anaerobic digesters with dewatered sludge[J]. Environmental Science, 2017,38(2):679-687.
[32]	Jiang Y, Banks C, Zhang Y, et al. Quantifying the percentage of methane formation via acetoclastic and syntrophic acetate oxidation pathways in anaerobic digesters[J]. Waste Management, 2018,71:749-756.
[33]	Wu L J, Kobayashi T, Kuramochi H, et al. High loading anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and grease trap waste:Determination of the limit and lipid/long chain fatty acid conversion[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018,338:422-431.
[34]	Jiang M, Qiao W, Wang Y, et al. Balancing acidogenesis and methanogenesis metabolism in thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste under a high loading rate[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022,824:153867.
[35]	Cheng H, Li Y, Li L, et al. Long-term operation performance and fouling behavior of a high-solid anaerobic membrane bioreactor in treating food waste[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020,394:124918.
[36]	Zhang Y, Li J, Liu F, et al. Reduction of Gibbs free energy and enhancement of Methanosaeta by bicarbonate to promote anaerobic syntrophic butyrate oxidation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018,267:209-217.
[37]	Li D, Ran Y, Chen L, et al. Instability diagnosis and syntrophic acetate oxidation during thermophilic digestion of vegetable waste[J]. Water Research, 2018,139:263-271.
[38]	Yin D-M, Westerholm M, Qiao W, et al. An explanation of the methanogenic pathway for methane production in anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-rich materials under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018,264:42-50.
[39]	Sasaki D, Hori T, Haruta S, et al. Methanogenic pathway and community structure in a thermophilic anaerobic digestion process of organic solid waste[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2011,111(1):41-46.
[40]	Niu L, Song L, Liu X, et al. Tepidimicrobium xylanilyticum sp. nov., an anaerobic xylanolytic bacterium, and emended description of the genus Tepidimicrobium [J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2009,59(11):2698-2701.
[41]	Maune M W, Tanner R S. Description of Anaerobaculum hydrogeniformans sp. nov., an anaerobe that produces hydrogen from glucose, and emended description of the genus Anaerobaculum [J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2012,62(Pt 4):832-838.
[42]	Hao L, Lü F, Mazéas L, et al. Stable isotope probing of acetate fed anaerobic batch incubations shows a partial resistance of acetoclastic methanogenesis catalyzed by Methanosarcina to sudden increase of ammonia level[J]. Water Research, 2015,69:90-99.
[43]	李蕾,何琴,马垚,等.厌氧消化过程稳定性与微生物群落的相关性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(11):3397-3404. Li L, He Q, Ma Y, et al. Investigation on the relationship between process stability and microbial community in anaerobic digestion[J]. China Environmental Science, 2016,36(11):3397-3404.
[44]	Shah F A, Mahmood Q, Shah M M, et al. Microbial ecology of anaerobic digesters:the key players of anaerobiosis[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014,2014:183752.
[45]	Franke-Whittle I H, Walter A, Ebner C, et al. Investigation into the effect of high concentrations of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion on methanogenic communities[J]. Waste Management, 2014,34(11):2080-2089.
[46]	Guo X, Wang C, Sun F, et al. A comparison of microbial characteristics between the thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digesters exposed to elevated food waste loadings[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,152:420-428.
[47]	Lerm S, Kleyböcker A, Miethling-Graff R, et al. Archaeal community composition affects the function of anaerobic co-digesters in response to organic overload[J]. Waste Management, 2012,32(3):389-399.
[48]	张虹,李蕾,彭韵,等.氨氮对餐厨垃圾厌氧消化性能及微生物群落的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(8):3465-3474. Zhang H, Li L, Peng Y, et al Effects of ammonia on anaerobic digestion of food waste:Process performance and microbial community[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(8):3465-3474.
[49]	Prathiviraj R, Chellapandi P. Comparative genomic analysis reveals starvation survival systems in Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ΔH[J]. Anaerobe, 2020,64:102216.
[50]	Manzoor S, Schnürer A, Bongcam-Rudloff E, et al. Complete genome sequence of Methanoculleus bourgensis strain MAB1, the syntrophic partner of mesophilic acetate-oxidising bacteria (SAOB)[J]. Standards in Genomic Sciences, 2016,11(1):80.