|
|
Studies oneco-compensationlivestockbreedingin Jiuzhou River Basinbasedon space optimization |
WANG Xi-qin1, LIU Wei-zhe1, ZHANG Xin-yue1, GAO Wei2 |
1. School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
2. School ofEcology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China |
|
|
Abstract Pollution fromlivestock breeding is a key emphasis of pollution control ofChina. Ecological compensation policy has great significance both in encouraging farmers to change traditional breeding mode andin reducing pollutant emissions.Using Jiuzhou River Basin as a case study, this paper set up a space optimization model for ecological compensation of pig-breedingbasedon large-scale survey data and related documents. The modeltook minimum amount of ecological compensationasthe objective, constrained by the capacity of water environmental capacity and cultivated landcarryingvapacity, at the same time ensuring nodeclinein the economic incomefrompig-breeding. The results showed that the minimum amount of ecological compensation in Jiuzhou River Basin is 583 million yuan, of which 292 million yuan is used for prohibitingthebreedingofabout 554 thousandpig-breeding, 194 million yuan is used to build environmentally-friendly breedinghouses insuitable area whichcanaccommodate the breeding of 479 thousand pigs, 97 million yuanis used for the transformation of breeding mode which about 185 thousands. After the optimization, the reduction of COD, TN and TP in the Jiuzhou River Basin would be 13980 t, 2545 t and 995 t.The total scale of livestock cultivation in the whole basin would be 1.2 million, with no traditionallivestock breeding modeand 81.19% using an environmentally-friendly model. There is a significant difference between the 10 towns both in compensation amount and pollutant reduction.Those towns with high compensation amounts are Wendi, Liangtian and Gucheng, accounting for 56.78% of the total compensation funds, and the COD reduction accounts for 55.35% of the total reduction. Through the optimized compensation plan, both environmental benefits and economic benefits can be achieved at the same time.
|
Received: 13 April 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
朱建春,张增强,樊志民,等.中国畜禽粪便的能源潜力与氮磷耕地负荷及总量控制[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014,33(3):435-445.
|
[2] |
潘丹,孔凡斌.养殖户环境友好型畜禽粪便处理方式选择行为分析——以生猪养殖为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015,(9):17-29.
|
[3] |
仇焕广,廖绍攀,井月,等.我国畜禽粪便污染的区域差异与发展趋势分析[J]. 环境科学, 2013,34(7):2766-2774.
|
[4] |
陈菲菲,张崇尚,王艺诺,等.规模化生猪养殖粪便处理与成本收益分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(9):3455-3463.
|
[5] |
仇焕广,莫海霞,白军飞,等.中国农村畜禽粪便处理方式及其影响因素——基于五省调查数据的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2012, (3):78-87.
|
[6] |
姜海,雷昊,白璐,等.不同类型地区畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用管理模式选择——以江苏省太湖地区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(12):2430-2440.
|
[7] |
吴林海,许国艳,杨乐.环境污染治理成本内部化条件下的适度生猪养殖规模的研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015,25(7):113-119.
|
[8] |
王西琴,高伟,张远,等.基于控制单元的农村生活污水处理优化模型[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(9):2835-2842.
|
[9] |
姚华荣,吴绍洪,曹明明,等.区域水土资源的空间优化配置[J]. 资源科学, 2004,26(1):99-106.
|
[10] |
赵海霞,王梅,段学军.水环境容量约束下的太湖流域产业集聚空间优化[J]. 中国环境科学, 2012,32(8):1530-1536.
|
[11] |
李鑫,肖长江,欧名豪,等.基于生态位适宜度理念的城镇用地空间优化配置研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017,26(3):376-383.
|
[12] |
罗鼎,许月卿,邵晓梅,等.土地利用空间优化配置研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009,28(5):791-797.
|
[13] |
李帷,李艳霞,杨明,等.北京市畜禽养殖的空间分布特征及其粪便耕地施用的可达性[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010,25(5):746-755.
|
[14] |
侯麟科,仇焕广,崔永伟,等.环境污染与畜牧业空间布局研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011,21(12):65-69.
|
[15] |
广东省人民政府,广西壮族自治区人民政府.《粤桂两省区九洲江流域水污染防治规划》[Z]. 2016.
|
[16] |
TRUOG E. Fifty years of soil testing[C]//Trans 7th International Congress of Soil Science. Madison, USA, 1960:46-53.
|
[17] |
环境保护部华南环境科学研究所.《广西九洲江流域水污染防治规划(2013年-2020年)》[Z]. 2014.
|
[18] |
牛若峰.农业技术经济手册[M]. 北京:农业出版社, 1984.
|
[19] |
邱乐丰,龙文莉,方豪,等.基于种养平衡的杭州市畜禽养殖环境承载力研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016,31(8):1410-1419.
|
[20] |
陈竹峰,杨波,邓斯聪.氮磷钾配施对水稻产量的影响研究[J]. 现代农业科学, 2008,15(10):17-18.
|
[21] |
曹连福,段曰亮.水稻土有效养分与其校正系数的数学模型[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012,(5):73-76.
|
|
|
|