磺胺嘧啶胁迫下作物根际微生物群落结构响应

金彩霞, 黄刘群, 魏闪, 邹威, 张杏丽, 孙瑞莲

中国环境科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 2708-2714.

PDF(564 KB)
PDF(564 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 2708-2714.
环境毒理

磺胺嘧啶胁迫下作物根际微生物群落结构响应

  • 金彩霞1, 黄刘群1, 魏闪1, 邹威1, 张杏丽1, 孙瑞莲2
作者信息 +

Responseof microbial community structure of crops under the pollution of sulphadiazine on the rhizosphere microinterface

  • JIN Cai-xia1, HUANG Liu-qun1, WEI Shan1, ZOU Wei1, ZHANG Xing-li1, SUN Rui-lian2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为了研究在磺胺类兽药胁迫下,两种作物在不同生长期根际微生物群落结构的响应,采用室内根际箱培养实验,测定玉米、小麦根际微界面土壤磷脂脂肪酸的量,研究在磺胺嘧啶(SD)胁迫下,不同作物根际土壤微界面微生物群落结构的空间变化.结果表明,SD对根际微生物活性的有抑制作用,且强度随浓度增加而增强.同一浓度SD作用下,根际微界面微生物生物量不同,在实验中,根际3mm和根室的微生物生物量最大,且二者之间差异不显著.不同微生物对根际效应敏感程度不同,细菌、革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌、蓝细菌和硫酸盐还原菌根际效应明显.在SD胁迫下,根际不同微界面土壤微生物群落结构变化明显.细菌、G+、G-、放线菌的生物量,随SD浓度升高而下降,主要表现为抑制效应,而对真菌生物量则表现为激活效应,生物量增加. 小麦根际土壤真菌:细菌(F/B)随SD浓度的升高,比值增大,在高浓度(5mg/kg)胁迫下,F/B比值最大(0.74),与对照差异显著(P < 0.05),说明土壤污染修复能力增强,而sat/mono比值在高浓度SD胁迫下降低,说明微生物群落结构向有利于SD降解的方向转化.根际效应有助于SD的降解,在1mg/kg SD作用下,小麦根际土壤降解率为7.01%,而非根际土壤降解率仅为2.49%,不同作物表现出的根际效应强弱不同,玉米根际效应强于小麦.

Abstract

In order to study the response of two crops to the microbial community structure of rhizosphere in different growth periods under sulfa veterinary drug stress.The amount of phospholipid fatty acids in soils at different micro-interfaces in rhizosphere was determined by rhizobox training experiments. The changes of microbial community structure in different spatial micro-interfaces of domesticated maize and wheat rhizosphere soil under sulfadiazine stress were studied. The results showed that the high concentration of SD had an inhibitory effect on rhizosphere microbial activity, and microbial biomass at different micro-interfaces in rhizosphere was different. The microbial biomass of the rhizosphere 3mm and root chamber was the largest at the micro-interface of the rhizosphere, and the difference between the two was not significant. Different microorganisms had different sensitivity to rhizosphere effects, and rhizosphere effects of bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, cyanobacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria were obvious. Under the action of SD stress and root exudates, the microbial community structure of rhizosphere soil changed significantly at different micro-interfaces. In the rhizosphere soil of wheat, the ratio of F/B increased with the increase of SD concentration in soil. Under the high concentration (5mg/kg), the F/B ratio was the largest (0.74), which was significantly different from the control (P < 0.05), indicating that the soil pollution remediation ability was enhanced, the sat/mono ratio was decreased at high concentration, and the microbial community structure was transformed in the direction favorable for SD degradation. The rhizosphere effect was beneficial to SD degradation. Under the action of 1mg/kg SD, the degradation rate in wheat rhizosphere soil was 7.01%, while the degradation rate in non-rhizosphere soil was only 2.49%, and the rhizosphere effect of maize was stronger than wheat.

关键词

根际微界面 / 磺胺嘧啶 / 磷脂脂肪酸 / 微生物群落结构

Key words

microbial community structure / phospholipid fatty acid / rhizosphere micro interface / sulfadiazine

引用本文

导出引用
金彩霞, 黄刘群, 魏闪, 邹威, 张杏丽, 孙瑞莲. 磺胺嘧啶胁迫下作物根际微生物群落结构响应[J]. 中国环境科学. 2020, 40(6): 2708-2714
JIN Cai-xia, HUANG Liu-qun, WEI Shan, ZOU Wei, ZHANG Xing-li, SUN Rui-lian. Responseof microbial community structure of crops under the pollution of sulphadiazine on the rhizosphere microinterface[J]. China Environmental Science. 2020, 40(6): 2708-2714
中图分类号: X131   

参考文献

[1] Gothwal R, Shashidhar T.Antibiotic pollution in the environment: a review [J].Clean–Soil AirWater, 2015,43(4):479-489.
[2] Borrmann S, Matuschewski K.Protective immunity against malaria by ‘natural immunization’:a question of dose,parasite diversity,or both?[J].Current Opinion in Immunology, 2011,23(4):500-508.
[3] Power C, Sayers R, O’Brien B, et al.Protocols and strategies to study the migration of veterinary drug residues into milk and dairy products in licensed trials [J].Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 2013,52(2):185-196.
[4] Wei R C, Ge F, Zhang L L, et al.Occurrence of 13 veterinary drugs in animal manure–amended soils in Eastern China [J].Chemosphere, 2016,144:2377-2383.
[5] Pan M, Chu L M.Phytotoxicity of veterinary antibiotics to seed germination and root elongation ofcrops [J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2016,126:228-237.
[6] Elena M C, Carmen G B, Sigrid S, et al.Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibiotics in animal manure and soils in Austria [J].Environmental Pollution, 2007,148(2):570-579.
[7] 常红,胡建英,王乐征,等.城市污水处理厂中磺胺类抗生素的调查研究[J].科学通报, 2008,53(2):159-164. Chang H, Hu J Y, Wang L Z, et al.Investigation of sulfonamides antibiotics in municipal sewage treatment plants [J].Chinese Science Bulletin, 2008,53(2):159-164.
[8] 张宁,李淼,刘翔.土壤中抗生素抗性基因的分布及迁移转化[J].中国环境科学, 2018,38(7):2609-2617. Zhang N, Li M, Liu X.Distribution and transformation of antibiotic resistance genes in soil [J].China Environmental Science, 2018,38(7):2609-2617.
[9] Cui C Z, Han Q, Jiang L, et al.Occurrence, distribution,and seasonal variation of antibiotics in an artificial water source reservoir in the Yangtze River delta, East China [J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018,25(20):19393-19402.
[10] 临维宣.各国食品中农药兽药残留限量规定[M].大连:大连海事出版社, 2001,1309-1310. Lin W X.The limits of pesticide and veterinary drug residues in food of various countries [M].Dalian: Dalian Maritime Press, 2001:1309-1310.
[11] Baran W, Sochacka J, Wardas W.Toxicity and biodegradability of sulfonamides and products of their photocatalytic degradation in aqueous solutions [J].Chemosphere, 2006,65(8):1295-1299.
[12] 颜慧,蔡祖聪,钟文辉.磷脂脂肪酸分析方法及其在土壤微生物多样性研究中的应用[J].土壤学报, 2006,43(5):851-859. Yan H, Cai Z C, Zhong W H.PLFA analysis and its applycations in the study of soil microbial diversity [J].Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2006, 43(5):851-859.
[13] Reichel R, Michelini L, Ghisi R, et al.Soil bacterial community response to sulfadiazine inthe soil-root zone [J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2015,178(3):499-506.
[14] 余泽宁.龙眼叶片膜脂脂肪酸组分与龙眼耐寒性的关系[J].亚热带植物科学, 2003,32(2):15-17. Yu Z N.Cold tolerance of longan in relation to membrane fatty acid composition in leaves [J].Subtropical Plant Science, 2003,32(2):15-17.
[15] Garwood D L, Weber E J, Lambert R J, et al.Effect of different cytoplasms on oil, fatty acids, plant height, and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.) [J].Crop Science, 1970,10(1):39-41.
[16] 崔昌浩,田晶,徐龙权.气相色谱法在检测细胞脂肪酸及菌种鉴定中的应用[J].大连轻工业学院学报, 2007,26(2):104-107. Cui C H, Tian J, Xu L Q.Application of gas chromatography in identification of bacteria by analyzing fatty acid in cells [J].Journal of Dalian Institute of Light Industry, 2007,26(2):104-107.
[17] Yang Q X, Tian T T, Niu T Q, et al.Molecular characterization of antibiotic resistance in cultivable multi drug–resistant bacteria from livestock manure [J].Environmental Pollution, 2017,229:188-198.
[18] Johansen A, Olsson S.Using phospholipid fatty acid technique to study short-term effects of the biological control agent Pseudomonas fluorescents DR54 on the microbial microbiota in barley rhizosphere [J].Microbial Ecology, 2005,49(2):272-281.
[19]
[19] Gou M, Hu H W, Zhang Y J, et al.Aerobic composting reduces antibiotic resistance genes in cattlemanure and the resistome dissemination in agricultural soils [J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018,612:1300-1310.
[20] Mckinley V L, Peacoek A D, White D C.Microbial community PLFA and PHB responses to ecosystem restoration in tallgrass prairie soils [J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2005,37(10):1946-1958.
[21] Mendes R, Kruijt M, de Bruijn I, et al.Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria [J].Science, 2011, 332(6033):1097-1100.
[22] 董黎明.利用磷脂脂肪酸表征白洋淀沉积物微生物特征[J].中国环境科学, 2011,31(11):1875-1880. Dong L M.Microbial characteristics in the sediments of Baiyangdian Lake utilizing phospholipid fatty acids analysis [J].China Environmental Science, 2011,31(11):1875-1880.
[23] 丁娜.多氯联苯在毫米级根际微域中的消减行为及生物响应机制研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2012. Ding N.Dissipation process of polychlorinated biphenyls in millimeter rhizosphere and mechanisms of biological responses to PCBs stress [D].Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012.
[24] 朱雯斐.作物根-土界面磺胺类药物环境行为及有机酸响应机制[D].河南:河南师范大学, 2013. Zhu W F.Studyofthedegradation of sulfonamides under various environment conditions and its influencing factors [D].Henan: Henan Normal University, 2013.
[25] 刘亚云,陈桂珠.植物修复多氯联苯研究进展[J].应用生态学报, 2006,17(2):325-330. Liu Y Y, Chen G Z.Research advances in phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) [J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006,17(2):325-330.
[26] Kantachote D, Naidu R, Singleton I, et al.Resistance of microbial populations in DDT-contaminated and uncontaminated soils [J].Applied Soil Ecology, 2001,16(1):85-90.

基金

国家自然科学基金资助项目(41907349,21906043,41601333);河南省科技攻关项目(20210230597)


PDF(564 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/