The definition of ecosystem service constraint relations and analysis of influence mechanism
GUAN Dong-jie1, LI Zi-hui1, ZHOU Li-lei2, ZHANG Yan-jun3
1. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 3. Big Data Application Center of the Chongqing Eco-environment, Chongqing 401147, China
Abstract:With the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) as the research object, the InVEST model was selected to evaluate five important ecosystem services of YREB. The constraint lines were first extracted based on the principle of pairing relationships, and then the model for interaction between ecosystem service constraint and influencing factor was established to explore the interaction mechanism. The results demonstrated that, from 2000 to 2015, the mutual two among five ecosystem services in the YREB were constrained as four types: rectangular, logarithmic, parabolic and hump, There exhibited weak correlation between the 7 influencing factors and the matched 10 pairs of restraint relationships. The relationship curves between the influence factors and the constraint relationships had significant difference in the spatial variations but generally showing a trend of upward and downward fluctuations; the contribution degree of influence factors to the constraint relationship differs case by case. Among them, the average contribution rate of radiation to the constraint relationship was the highest, reaching 21.43%, and the contribution rate to food supply-habitat quality was the highest, 33.10%; the average contribution rate of NDVI was the lowest 7.55%, and the contribution rate to food supply-habitat quality was the lowest 5.70%; the interaction and constraint relationship between various factors turned out to be the internal mechanism assigning to the change of ecosystem service constraints.
官冬杰, 李子辉, 周李磊, 张艳军. 生态系统服务约束关系界定及影响机制分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(12): 5837-5848.
GUAN Dong-jie, LI Zi-hui, ZHOU Li-lei, ZHANG Yan-jun. The definition of ecosystem service constraint relations and analysis of influence mechanism. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2021, 41(12): 5837-5848.
刘园,周勇.长江经济带生态系统服务价值时空变化特征分析及灰色预测[J]. 生态经济, 2019,35(4):196-201. Liu Y, Zhou Y. Spatiotemporal dynamics and grey forecast of ecosystem services value in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Ecological Economy, 2019,35(4):196-201.
[2]
吴丹,邹长新,林乃峰,等.长江经济带生态系统宏观结构变化特征分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018,34(6):499-503. Wu D, Zou C X, Lin N F, et al. Characteristic analysis of ecosystem spatial pattern and structure in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018,34(6):499-503.
[3]
翟天林,王静,金志丰,等.长江经济带生态系统服务供需格局变化与关联性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(15):5414-5424. Zhai T L, Wang J, Jin Z F, et al. Change and correlation analysis of the supply-demand pattern of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(15):5414-5424.
[4]
包蕊,刘峰,张建平,等.基于多目标线性规划的甲积峪小流域生态系统服务权衡优化[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(3):812-828. Bao R, Liu F, Zhang J P, et al. Multi-objective linear programming- based trade-off and optimization of the ecosystem services in Jiajiyu small watershed in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(3):812-828.
[5]
邓煌炜,廖振良.生态系统服务驱动因素及供需研究进展[J]. 环境科技, 2020,33(1):74-78. Deng H W, Liao Z L. Review of drivers, supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2020,33(1):74-78.
[6]
Qiao J, Yu D, Cao Q, et al. Identifying the relationships and drivers of agro-ecosystem services using a constraint line approach in the agro-pastoral transitional zone of China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,106:105439.
[7]
郝蕊芳,于德永,邬建国,等.约束线方法在生态学研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016,40(10):1100-1109. Hao R F, Yu D Y, Wu J G, et al. Constraint line methods and the applications in ecology[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(10):1100-1109.
[8]
Simoncini R, Ring I, Sandström C, et al. Constraints and opportunities for mainstreaming biodiversity and ecosystem services in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy: Insights from the IPBES assessment for Europe and Central Asia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019,88:104099.
[9]
巩杰,徐彩仙,燕玲玲,等.1997~2018年生态系统服务研究热点变化与动向[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(10):3265-3276. Gong J, Xu C X, Yan L L, et al. Changes and trends in research hotspots of ecosystem services from 1997 to 2018[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019,30(10):3265-3276.
[10]
Hooper T, Borger T, Langmead O, et al. Applying the natural capital approach to decision making for the marine environment[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019,38:100947.
[11]
Yang W, Jin Y, Sun T, et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in coastal wetlands under the effects of reclamation activities[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018,92:354-366.
[12]
Jia X, Fu B, Feng X, et al. The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,43(43):103-113.
[13]
Yang G, Ge Y, Xue H, et al. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes[J]. Landscape and urban planning, 2015,136:110-121.
[14]
官冬杰,周李磊,李秋彦,等.重庆市湿地生态系统服务约束关系[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(4):1753-1764. Guan D J, Zhou L L, Li Q Y, et al. Constraints relationship of wetland ecosystem services in Chongqing[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(4):1753-1764.
[15]
Hao R, Yu D, Wu J. Relationship between paired ecosystem services in the grassland and agro-pastoral transitional zone of China using the constraint line method[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2017,240:171-181.
[16]
Simoncini R, Ring I, Sandstrom C, et al. Constraints and opportunities for mainstreaming biodiversity and ecosystem services in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy: Insights from the IPBES assessment for Europe and Central Asia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019,88:104099.
[17]
Lester S E, Costello C, Halpern B S, et al. Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning[J]. Marine Policy, 2013,38:80-89.
[18]
Hao R, Yu D, Sun Y, et al. The features and influential factors of interactions among ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,101:770-779.
[19]
Bai Y, Ochuodho T O, Yang J. Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,102:51-64.
[20]
Nguyen T H, Cook M, Field J L, et al. High-resolution trade-off analysis and optimization of ecosystem services and disservices in agricultural landscapes[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2018,107:105-118.
[21]
Washbourne C, Goddard M A, Le Provost G, et al. Trade-offs and synergies in the ecosystem service demand of urban brownfield stakeholders[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020,42:101074.
[22]
黄麟,祝萍,曹巍.中国退耕还林还草对生态系统服务权衡与协同的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021(3):1178-1188. Huang L, Zhu P, Cao W. The impacts of the Grain for Green Project on the trade-off and synergy relationships among multiple ecosystem services in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(3):1178-1188.
[23]
张建,雷刚,漆良华,等.2003~2018年土地利用变化下丹江口市景观格局与生态服务价值研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021,(4):1-11. Zhang J, Lei G, Qi L, et al. The landscape pattern and ecological service value in Danjiangkou City under land use change from 2003 to 2018[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(4):1280-1290.
[24]
滕堂伟,瞿丛艺,曾刚.长江经济带城市生态环境协同发展能力评价[J]. 中国环境管理, 2017,9(2):51-56. Teng T W, Qu C Y, Zeng G. Evaluation on coordinated development ability of urban ecological environment in the Yangtze River Economic Zone[J]. China Environmental Management, 2017,9(2): 51-56.
[25]
黄娟, 程丙.长江经济带“生态优先”绿色发展的思考[J]. 环境保护, 2017,45(7):59-64. Huang J, Cheng B. Thinking on the green development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt “Ecological Priority”[J]. Environmental protection, 2017,45(7):59-64.
[26]
黄烈佳,杨鹏.长江经济带土地生态安全时空演化特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019,28(8):1780-1790. Huang L J, Yang P. Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of land ecological security in the Yangtze River Economic Zone[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019,28(8):1780-1790.
[27]
王洪铸,刘学勤,王海军.长江河流-泛滥平原生态系统面临的威胁与整体保护对策[J]. 水生生物学报, 2019,43(S1):157-182. Wang H Z, Liu X Q, Wang H J. The Yangtze River-Floodplain ecosystem: multiple threats and holistic conservation[J]. Acta Hydeobiologica Sinica, 2019,43(S1):157-182.
[28]
潘梅,陈天伟,黄麟,等.京津冀地区生态系统服务时空变化及驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2020,40(15):5151-5167. Pan M, Chen T W, Huang L, et al. Spatial and temporal variations in ecosystem services and its driving factors analysis in Jing-Jin-Ji region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(15):5151-5167.
[29]
Hoyer R, Chang H. Assessment of freshwater ecosystem services in the Tualatin and Yamhill basins under climate change and urbanization[J]. Applied Geography, 2014,53:402-416.
[30]
Baude M, Meyer B C, Schindewolf M. Land use change in an agricultural landscape causing degradation of soil based ecosystem services[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019,659:1526-1536.
[31]
樊雷,余娇,芦艳艳,等.淅川县生态系统服务对土地利用变化的敏感性分析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2019,42(S2):302-308. Fan L, Yu J, Lu Y Y, et al. Sensitivity analysis of ecosystem services to land use change in Xichuan County[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019,42(2):302-308.
[32]
Vander B K, Meire P, Schellekens T, et al. Aligning biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in spatial planning: Focus on ecosystem processes[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 712:136350.
[33]
Wang, D G, Han, F J, Shen G, et al. Study on the driving mechanism of ecosystem service value on Ximen Island based on STIRPAT Model[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 53:30-36.
[34]
Muller F, Bicking S, Ahrendt K, et al. Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany - An expert-based matrix approach[J]. Ecol. Indic. 2020,112:106-116.
[35]
欧维新,王宏宁,陶宇.基于土地利用与土地覆被的长三角生态系统服务供需空间格局及热点区变化[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(17): 6337-6347. Ou W X, Wang H N, Tao Y. A land cover-based assessment of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics in the Yangtze River Delta region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(17):6337-6347.
[36]
Li Z H, Guan D J, Zhou L L, et al. Constraint relationship of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13845-2.