基于制造业及劳动力异质性的环境规制就业效应

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (9)

全文: PDF (713 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要将环境规制的就业影响识别为：劳动投入-污染排放弹性、环境规制的相对成本和环境规制-污染排放弹性，并利用2003~2017年的制造业行业面板数据进行实证检验.结果表明：环境规制对制造业总体就业造成显著负向影响，且该影响主要体现在劳动密集型行业中，其研发和非研发人员均受到显著负向冲击；资本密集型行业受影响不显著；技术密集型行业总体就业和非研发人员就业受到显著正向影响.弹性和相对成本测算表明，劳动密集型行业受到规模（减小）、挤出、技术替代等多效应的负向冲击；技术密集型行业受规模（增大）效应和就业创造效应的正向促进；资本密集型行业中各效应均不明显.建议有关部门通过减排成本补贴、劳动力技能培训、新型环保产业培育等措施减少环境规制的负向就业影响.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	蒯鹏
	时玉勤
	陶爱萍
	吴烈

关键词 ：环境规制, 就业, 影响机制, 实证检验

Abstract：In this paper, the employment impact of environmental regulation was identified as the labor input related pollutant emission elasticity, the environmental regulation related pollutant emission elasticity, and the relative cost of environmental regulation. An empirical test based on the panel data from 2003 through 2017 revealed that environmental regulation adversely impacted the overall employment of the manufacturing industry (particularly in labor-intensive industries, research, and non-research personnel in the industries). However, it had a positive impact on technology-intensive sectors and non-research personnel's employment in the industries. However, the impact on capital-intensive industries remained negligible. Furthermore, the results yielded in the elasticity, and relative cost calculation demonstrates that labor-intensive industries subjected to the negative impact such as scale (decrease), crowding out, and technological substitution. Contrastingly, the technology-intensive industries are positively promoted by the scale (increase) effect and job-creation effect. The capital-intensive industries remain unaffected by the impact. Therefore, relevant departments are encouraged to implement measures such as providing subsidies to compensate for emission reduction costs, organize training sessions for the labor force, and cultivating new environmental protection industries to alleviate the negative impact of environmental regulation on employment.

Key words： environmental regulation employment impact mechanism empirical test

收稿日期: 2020-12-21

PACS:

X196

基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目（71704044）

通讯作者: 陶爱萍,教授,aipingtao@yeah.net E-mail: aipingtao@yeah.net

作者简介: 蒯鹏(1982-),男,湖北随州人,讲师,博士,研究方向为环境经济政策量化评价.发表论文10余篇.

引用本文:

蒯鹏, 时玉勤, 陶爱萍, 吴烈. 基于制造业及劳动力异质性的环境规制就业效应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(8): 3934-3943. KUAI Peng, SHI Yu-qin, TAO Ai-ping, WU Lie. The employment effects of environmental regulation based on the heterogeneity of the manufacturing industry and labor force. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2021, 41(8): 3934-3943.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V41/I8/3934

[1]	陆旸.从开放宏观的视角看环境污染问题:一个综述[J]. 经济研究, 2012,47(2):146-158. Lu S. Environmental issues in an open economy:a survey[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012,47(2):146-158.
[2]	晋盛武,赵劲松,王帅.环境规制对我国资源型城市就业的影响机制及实证分析[J]. 华东经济管理, 2020,34(12):65-73. Jin S W, Zhao J S, Wang S. The influence mechanism and empirical analysis of environmental regulation on employment in resource-based cities[J]. East China Economic Management, 2020,34(12):65-73.
[3]	周五七,陶靓.环境规制影响中国劳动力就业的区域异质性——基于产业结构门槛效应的实证检验[J]. 西部论坛, 2020,30(1):100-110. Regional difference of the impact of environmental regulation on the employment of Chinese labor force:empirical test based on the threshold effect of industrial structure[J]. West Forum, 2020,30(1):100-110.
[4]	孙文远,程秀英.环境规制对污染行业就业的影响[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 2018,15(2):25-34. Sun W Y, CHeng X Y. The impact of environmental regulation on the employment of pollution industry[J]. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 2018,15(2):25-34.
[5]	Berman E, Bui L T M. Environmental regulation and labor demand:evidence from the south Coast Air Basin[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2001,79(2):265-295.
[6]	崔广慧,姜英兵.环保产业政策支持对劳动力需求的影响研究——基于重污染上市公司的经验证据[J]. 产业经济研究, 2019,(1):99-112. Cui G H, Jiang Y B. A study of the impact of environmental industry policy support on labor demand:based on empirical evidence of heavy polluting listed companies[J]. Industrial Economics Research, 2019,(1):99-112.
[7]	王勇,谢婷婷,郝翠红.环境成本上升如何影响企业就业增长?——基于排污费修订政策的实证研究[J]. 南开经济研究, 2019, (4):12-36. Wang Y, Xie T T, Hao C H. How do rising environmental costs effect employment growth:an empirical study based on the revision policy of pollution discharge fees[J]. Nankai Economic Studies, 2019,(4):12-36.
[8]	李梦洁,杜威剑.环境规制与就业的双重红利适用于中国现阶段吗?——基于省际面板数据的经验分析[J]. 经济科学, 2014, 36(4):14-26. Li M J, Du W J. Is the dual dividend of environmental regulation and employment applicable to China at the present stage?——an empirical analysis based on provincial panel data[J]. Economic Science, 2014,36(4):14-26.
[9]	余东华,孙婷.环境规制、技能溢价与制造业国际竞争力[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017,(5):35-53. Yu D H, Sun T. Environmental regulation, skill premium and international competitiveness of manufacturing industry[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2017,(5):35-53.
[10]	Raff Z, Earnhart D. The effects of clean Water Act enforcement on environmental employment[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2019,57:1-17.
[11]	Bartz S, Kelly D L. Economic growth and the environment:Theory and facts[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2008,30(2):115-149.
[12]	施美程,王勇.环境规制差异、行业特征与就业动态[J]. 南方经济, 2016,35(7):48-62. Shi M C, Wang Y. Environmental regulation difference, industry characteristics and employment dynamic[J]. South China Journal of Economics, 2016,35(7):48-62.
[13]	宋丽颖,崔帆.环境规制如何影响就业——基于中国省级数据的现实验证[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021,45(1):87-92. How does environmental regulation affect employment-an empirical study based on the reality verification of China provincial data[J]. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2021,45(1):87-92.
[14]	Werner A, Brian R, Copeland M, etal. Is free trade good for the environment?[J]. American Economic Review, 2001,91(4):877-908.
[15]	曹执令,杨婧.中国制造业环境污染水平测算与变化态势分析[J]. 经济地理, 2013,33(4):107-113. Cao Z L, Yang J. Manufacturing level estimation and trend analysis of environmental pollution in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(4):107-113.
[16]	秦楠,刘李华,孙早.环境规制对就业的影响研究——基于中国工业行业异质性的视角[J]. 经济评论, 2018,(1):106-119. Qin N, Liu L H, Sun Z. Impact of environmental regulation on employment:based on the perspective of Chinese industry heterogeneity[J]. Economic Review, 2018,(1):106-119.
[17]	傅京燕,李丽莎.环境规制、要素禀赋与产业国际竞争力的实证研究——基于中国制造业的面板数据[J]. 管理世界, 2010,(10):87-98,187. Fu J Y, Li L S. A case study on the environmental regulation, the factor endowment and the international competitiveness in industries[J]. Management World, 2010,(10):87-98,187.
[18]	邵帅,杨振兵.环境规制与劳动需求:双重红利效应存在吗?——来自中国工业部门的经验证据[J]. 环境经济研究, 2017,2(2):64-80. Shao S, Yang Z B. Environmental regulation and labor demand:Does the double dividend effect exist? evidence from China's industrial sector[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics, 2017,2(2):64-80.
[19]	国家统计局.中国工业统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2003-2017. National Bureau of Statistics. China industrial statistics yearbook[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2003-2017.
[20]	国家统计局.中国劳动统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2003-2018. National Bureau of Statistics. China labour statistics yearbook[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2003-2018.
[21]	国家统计局.中国科技统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2003-2018. National Bureau of Statistics. China statistical yearbook on science and technology[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2003-2018.
[22]	阳立高,谢锐,贺正楚,等.劳动力成本上升对制造业结构升级的影响研究——基于中国制造业细分行业数据的实证分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2014,(12):136-147. Yang L G, Xie R, He Z C, et al. Research on the impact of rising labor cost on manufacturing structure upgrading——an empirical analysis based on the data of sub-sectors of Chinese manufacturing[J]. China Soft Science, 2014,(12):136-147.
[23]	Bezdek R H, Wendling R M, Diperna P. Environmental protection, the economy, and jobs:national and regional analyses[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008,86(1):63-79.
[24]	王柱焱,潘超.环境规制能否带来就业的增长?——基于省际面板数据的检验[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021,49(9):237-242. Can environmental regulation promote employment growth?-inspection based on provincial panel data[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021,49(9):237-242.
[25]	陆旸.中国的绿色政策与就业:存在双重红利吗?[J]. 经济研究, 2011,46(7):42-54. Lu S. Green policies and jobs in China:a double dividend?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2011,46(7):42-54.