Abstract:In order to evaluate the impacts on energy, environment and resources arose from the lithium titanate batteries used on electric vehicles, firstly a life cycle assessment model for the Li-ion batteries were established, which included the re-purposing and second-use stages. Then a lithium titanate battery pack made by a domestic enterprise, which was used on an all-electric city bus, was chosen as the study case. And its life cycle CED (cumulative energy demand), GWP (global warming potential) and ADP(e) (abiotic depletion potential for elements), as the three major indicators of impacts, were calculated. The results showed that the CED, GWP and ADP(e) for every kilo-watt hour capacity of the battery pack in its life cycle were 2.8×104MJ, 1.86×103kg CO2eq. and 4.77×10-3kg Sbeq. respectively. It was found that the energy loss due to the battery efficiency in both use stages had played the key role in battery's life cycle GWP, while GWP of the producing stage mostly came from the embedded greenhouse gas emissions of raw materials such as the cathode and anode materials, aluminum parts and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. From the perspective of the energy stored and delivered in its life cycle, the LTO battery's GWP per every mega-Joule would decrease significantly with the second-life usage, and GWP of its producing stage is the lowest among all of the Li-ion batteries in the comparison with previous studies.
殷仁述, 杨沿平, 杨阳, 陈志林. 车用钛酸锂电池生命周期评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(6): 2371-2381.
YIN Ren-shu, YANG Yan-ping, YANG Yang, CHEN Zhi-lin. Life cycle assessment of the lithium titanate batteries used for electric vehicles. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2018, 38(6): 2371-2381.
Zaghib K, Dontigny M, Guerfi A, et al. Safe and fast-charging Li-ion battery with long shelf life for power applications[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011,196(8):3949-3954.
Ambrose H, Kendall A. Effects of battery chemistry and performance on the life cycle greenhouse gas intensity of electric mobility[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2016,47:182-194.
Peters J F, Baumann M, Zimmermann B et al. The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters, A review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017,67:491-506.
Ellingsen L A W, Majeau-Bettez G, Singh B et al. Life cycle assessment of a Lithium-Ion battery vehicle pack[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2014,18(1):113-124.
[14]
Helms H, Lambrecht U. The Potential Contribution of Light-Weighting to Reduce Transport Energy Consumption[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007,12(1):58-64.
Tang W, Chen X, Zhou T, et al. Hydrometallurgy recovery of Ti and Li from spent lithium titanate cathodes by a hydrometallurgical process[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2014,147-148:210-216.
The International Aluminium Institute. A life-cycle model of Chinese grid power and its application to the life cycle impact assessment of primary aluminium[EB/OL]. http://www.world-aluminium.org/media/filer_public/2017/06/29/lca_model_of_chinese_grid_power_and_application_to_aluminium_industry.pdf.
Zackrisson M, Avellan L, Orlenius J. Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles-Critical issues[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010,18(15):1519-1529.
[26]
Majeau-Bettez G, Hawkins T R, Stromman A H. Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011,45(10):4548-4554.
[27]
Li B, Gao X, Li J, et al. Life cycle environmental impact of high-capacity lithium ion battery with silicon nanowires anode for electric vehicles.[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2014,48(5):3047-55.
[28]
Kim H C, Wallington T J, Arsenault R, et al. Cradle-to-Gate Emissions from a Commercial Electric Vehicle Li-Ion Battery:A Comparative Analysis[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2016,50(14):7715-7722.
[29]
Oliveira L, Messagie M, Rangaraju S, et al. Key issues of lithium-ion batteries-from resource depletion to environmental performance indicators[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 108:354-362.