Research and application status of dynamic life cycle assessment
CHEN Sha, SUN Zhong-mei, LI Su-mei, LIU Ying-ying, SHI Xiao-dan
Key Laboratory of Beijing on Regional Air Pollution Control, College of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the most widely used tool for the environmental evaluation of system and its capabilities no need to be proved. However, there are still several limitations in its theory and application, including the lack of temporal dimension and spatial dimensionin its inventories and impact methods. These limitations mainly include ignoring the changes of products and energy systems over time; the use of static and outdated historical inventory data instead of time-based life cycle inventory (LCI) data; and lacking thechoose and calculation methods of the dynamic characteristics factors inimpact assessment. Dynamic life cycle assessment (DLCA) is an evaluation method of modeling ofdynamic processfor the industrial and environmental system with temporal and spatial dimensional change, which can accurately and scientifically improves the traditional life cycle assessment results. This paper summarized the present studies on the DLCA in three parts:dynamic modeling and analysis using time information as an uncertain factor; dynamic data extraction methods of production process or pollutant emissions based on real time; impact assessment methods of dynamic characteristic factors on the basis of time differentiation. At present, the DLCA method doesn't have uniform framework. Besides, there is no scientific mathematical model and software for time-differentiated LCI calculation and modeling solution for life cycle impact assessment. So this paper will provide an outlook of the future development of DLCA in order to support for the research, application, development and improvement of LCA method.
陈莎, 孙中梅, 李素梅, 刘影影, 石晓丹. 动态生命周期评价的研究与应用现状[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(12): 4764-4771.
CHEN Sha, SUN Zhong-mei, LI Su-mei, LIU Ying-ying, SHI Xiao-dan. Research and application status of dynamic life cycle assessment. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2018, 38(12): 4764-4771.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization).ISO 14040 environmental management-Life cycle assessment-general principles and Framework[R]. Geneva, Switpolicezerland:ISO, 2006.
[2]
Wioletta M B, Anna H, Beata S G. LCA application in the assessment of new technologies of industrial effluents treatment[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2016,57(3):1058-1066.
[3]
Thilde F, Jiri H, Thomas A. Life-cycle assessment of selected management options for air pollution control residues from waste incineration[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010,408(20):4672-4680.
Omar R H. Applying Life Cycle Tools and process engineering to determine the most adequate treatment process conditions. A tool in environmental policy[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2005,5(10):355-363.
[11]
Stefanie H, Llorene M C. Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment[J]. Science, 2014,344(6):1109-1113.
[12]
Thorn M, Kraus J, Parker D. Life-cycle assessment as a sustainability management tool:strengths, weaknesses, and other considerations[J]. Environment Quality Management, 2011,20:1-10.
Beloin S P, Heijungs D R,Blanc, I. The ESPA (Enhanced Structural Path Analysis) method:a solution to an implementation challenge for dynamic life cycle assessment studies[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014,19(4):861-871.
[17]
Collinge W O, Landis A E, Jones A K. Dynamic life cycle assessment:framework and application to an institutional building[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013,18(3):538-552.
[18]
Reap J, Felipe R, Scott D. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment-Part 2:impact assessment and interpretation[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2008,13(4):374-388.
Ming H. Dynamic life cycle assessment integrating value choice and temporal factors-A case study of an elementary school[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2018,158:1087-1096.
[21]
Cooper J, Kahn E. Commentary on issues in data quality analysis in life cycle assessment[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012,17:499-503.