Based on the observational data, upper air and ground surface synoptic field during 2014~2015, and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data in December 2015, combined with WRF-CMAQ numerical model, the characteristics and the cause of the air pollution process in Dalian were analyzed. The results showed that there were 145 pollution days, accounting for 20%, and 35pollution processes in Dalian from 2014 to 2015. The upper air circulations during air pollutions were mainly northwest air flow field after the trough (accounting for 63%), and the southwest air flow field before the trough (accounting for 21%). The ground surface synoptic field were mainly in two types, which are uniform pressure field with weak wind (accounting for 68%) and intensive isobars with high-speed wind. The atmospheric stratification was stable, with weak average horizontal wind during 5air pollution processes in December 2015 in Dalian, which suppressed the dispersion of pollutant in the vertical and horizontal directions, leading to the deterioration of air quality. Results of the numerical model simulation showed that nitrate, ammonium and sulfate are the main components of aerosols during the pollution process. And the nitrate provided the first contribution and the most obvious increase during the pollution processes, which means the vehicle emission and coal-fired emission already had important impacts on the formation of urban pollution in Dalian.
傅瑜, 李红斌, 于蕙箐, 王秀萍, 赵繁盛, 周德平, 何阳, 濮文耀, 张殿刚. 大连市大气污染天气特征及污染成因模拟分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(10): 3639-3646.
FU Yu, LI Hong-bin, YU Hui-qing, WANG Xiu-ping, ZHAO Fan-sheng, ZHOU De-ping, HE Yang, PU Wen-yao, ZHANG Dian-gang. Weather characteristics and simulation analysis on causes of air pollution in Dalian. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2018, 38(10): 3639-3646.
Wu D, Tie X X, Deng X J. Chemical characterizations of soluble aerosols in Southern China[J]. Chemosphere, 2006,64(5):749-757.
[4]
GB3095-2012环境空气质量标准[S].
[5]
HJ633-2012环境空气质量指数(AQI)技术规定(试行)[S].
[6]
Weiss R E, Waggoner A P, Charlson R J, et al. Sulfate aerosol; Its geographical extent in the Midwestern and southern United States[J]. Science, 1977,195(4282):979-981.
[7]
Husar R B, Wilson W E. Haze and sulfur emission trends in the eastern United States[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1993,27(1):12-16.
Ferman M A, Wolff G T, Kelly N A. The nature and source of haze in the Shenandoah Valley/Blue Ridge Mountains area[J]. Air Pollut Control Assoc, 1991,31(10):1074-1082.
Ziomas I C, Melas D, Zerefos C S, et al. Forecasting peak pollutant levels from meteorological variables[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1995,29(24):3703-3711.
Tai A P K, Loretta J M, Daniel J J, et al. Correlations between fine particulate matter(PM2.5)and meteorological variables in the United States:Implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010,44(32):3976-3984.
Ding A, Wang T, Zhao M, et al. Simulation of sea-land breezes and a discussion of their implications on the transport of air pollution during a multi-day ozone episode in the Pearl River Delta of China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004,38(39):6737-6750.
[21]
Chen X L, Feng Y R, Li J N, et al. Numerical simulations on the effect of set-land breezes on atmospheric haze over the Pearl River Delta region[J]. Environment Model Assessment, 2009,14(3):351-363.
Zhang Q, Streets D G, Carmichael G R, et al. Asian emissions in 2006for the NASA INTEX-B mission[J] Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009,9(14):5131-5153.
