A study on market-oriented ecological compensation for the ecosystem services based on Wuma River Watershed
ZENG Xian-gang1, LIU Ji-xin1,2, DUAN Cun-ru1, CUI Peng3, DONG Zhan-feng4
1. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
2. Foreign Economic Cooperation Office, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100035, China;
3. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Science, Nanjing 210042, China;
4. Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Beijing 100012, China
As a tributary of Chishui River, Wuma River provides water resources for the downstream wine enterprises, which creates the conditions for realizing market-oriented ecological compensation in Wuma River watershed. This paper uses the Conversion of Land Use and its Effects at Small Region Extent model (CLUE-S model) to simulate the current land use and land cover and that in 2030, encompassing two scenarios, that is, scenarios of economic development and scenarios of ecological protection. Then this paper assesses three types of ecosystem services which are water yield, nutrient translocation and sediment retention in the watershed based on the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Service and Tradeoffs model (InVEST model). The current total ecosystem service value in the watershed was 418.25million yuan, and the total value under the two scenarios was 417.59million yuan and 416.22million yuan respectively. In addition, based on the investigation of the compensation willingness of local residents and wine enterprises, the maximum of ecological compensation that meets the wishes of stakeholders should be decided as 274million yuan per year. Finally, this study uses the development opportunity cost method to get the loss of 178million yuan per year. Combined with the results, the rational range of the market-oriented ecological compensation standard for Wuma River watershed can be determined. Based on the compensation standard and SWOT analysis, the market-oriented ecological compensation mechanism for Wuma River watershed can be designed.
曾贤刚, 刘纪新, 段存儒, 崔鹏, 董战峰. 基于生态系统服务的市场化生态补偿机制研究——以五马河流域为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(12): 4755-4763.
ZENG Xian-gang, LIU Ji-xin, DUAN Cun-ru, CUI Peng, DONG Zhan-feng. A study on market-oriented ecological compensation for the ecosystem services based on Wuma River Watershed. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2018, 38(12): 4755-4763.
Daily G C. The value of nature and the nature of value[J]. Science, 2000,289(5478):395-396.
[2]
Subhrenduk, Pattanayak. Valuing watershed services:concepts and empirics from Southeast Asia[J]. Agricultural, Ecosystems & Environment, 2004,18(12):171-184.
[3]
Morana D, Mc Vittie A, Allcroft D J, et al. Quantifying public preferences for agrienvironmental policy in Scotland:A comparison of methods[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,63(1):42-53.
[4]
Kosoy N, Martinez Tuna M, Muradian R, et al. Payments for environmental services in watersheds, insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,61(6):446-455.
Verburg P H, Overmars K P. Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling:exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE Model[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2009,24(1):1167-1181.
