雅江河谷防沙治沙工程近地表特性——林下植被特性、生物结皮及土壤养分变化特征

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (6)

全文: PDF (547 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要采用对比分析和时空互代法，从植被配置模式（杨树+砂生槐、砂生槐、花棒、藏沙蒿）、工程年限（6，10，30a）2个方面，研究了雅鲁藏布江（简称雅江）河谷防沙治沙生态工程实施过程中林下植被特性、地表生物结皮及土壤养分等变化特征.结果表明，工程年限为10a的乔灌（杨树+砂生槐）、灌木（砂生槐、花棒）型样地较草本（藏沙蒿）更有利于提高林下植物多样性，且杨树+砂生槐样地的林下植被地上生物量、枯落物量、地下生物量、土壤有机质、全氮与全磷含量均显著高于其他3种样地.藏沙蒿样地的生物结皮最为发育，花棒样地次之，杨树+砂生槐样地无结皮.随年限延长，杨树+砂生槐样地林下植物多样性、枯落物量、地下生物量、土壤有机质、全氮及全磷含量呈增加趋势，生物结皮仅在6a样地中有发育；砂生槐样地地上生物量、地下生物量、生物结皮逐渐增加，但植物多样性、全氮含量呈下降趋势，枯落物量、有机碳及全氮含量呈先增加后减小规律.不同配置模式中，杨树+砂生槐乔灌型样地各项指标综合表现最佳，并随工程年限延长，对促进河谷沙地植被演替、提高植被生产力、提升沙地肥力等作用愈强.建议该区防沙治沙工程中应推广杨树+砂生槐乔灌型模式为主.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘琳
	张宝军
	熊东红
	唐永发
	袁勇

关键词 ：沙地, 生态工程, 植被特性, 生物结皮, 雅鲁藏布江

Abstract：In order to understand the impact of ecological project for sand control on the vegetation, biological crusts and soil characteristics of the middle reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River valley. The characteristics of understory vegetation, surface biological crusts, and soil fertility properties during the implementation of the project with different vegetation configuration modes and ages were analyzed. 4 modes which restoration ages were approximately 10 years were selected, including Populus+Sophora moorcroftiana (YS+SSH), Sophora moorcroftiana (SSH), Hedysarum scoparium (HB) and Artemisia wellbyi (ZSH). Because of the most widely implemented of YS+SSH and SSH, three ages were studied (i.e. 6, 10 and 30 years old). The results showed that:The arbor+shrub (YS+SSH) and shrub (SSH and HB) plots with 10 years were more conducive to increasing species diversity than the herb (ZSH). The above-ground biomass, litter volume, underground biomass, soil organic matter, total nitrogen and total phosphorus content of the YS+SSH plot were significantly higher than the other three plots. The biological crusts of the ZSH plot were the most developed, followed by the HB plots, and the YS+SSH plot had no crust. The species diversity index, litter storage, underground biomass, soil organic matter, total nitrogen and total phosphorus content of the YS+SSH plot increased with the increase of years, but the biological crust was only in 6 years. The aboveground biomass, underground biomass, and biological crusts of the SSH plot gradually increased with the increasing of years, but the species diversity index and total nitrogen content showed a downward trend. The litter storage, organic carbon and total nitrogen content increased first and then decreased. Among the different modes, the YS+SSH plot had the best comprehensive near-surface characteristics. With the increasing of the project years, it had stronger effects on promoting the succession of vegetation on the sandy land in this area, increasing the productivity of the vegetation, and enhancing the fertility of the sandy land. Therefore, it is suggested that the vegetation configuration mode of arbor+shrub(YS+SSH) should be promoted in the ecological project for sand control in this area.

Key words： land desertification ecological project variation characteristics biological crusts Yarlung Zangbo River valley

收稿日期: 2021-01-27

PACS:

X171.4

基金资助:第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究资助项目（2019QZKK0404）；中国科学院先导专项A（XDA20020401）

通讯作者: 熊东红,研究员,dhxiong@imde.ac.cn E-mail: dhxiong@imde.ac.cn

作者简介: 刘琳(1996-),女,贵州岑巩人,博士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持工作.

引用本文:

刘琳, 张宝军, 熊东红, 唐永发, 袁勇. 雅江河谷防沙治沙工程近地表特性——林下植被特性、生物结皮及土壤养分变化特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(9): 4310-4319. LIU Lin, ZHANG Bao-jun, XIONG Dong-hong, TANG Yong-fa, YUAN Yong. Variation characteristics of vegetation characteristics, biological crusts and soil nutrients under the main vegetation configuration modes in the process of sand control in the Yarlung Zangbo River valley. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2021, 41(9): 4310-4319.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V41/I9/4310

[1]	马增旺,范少辉,官凤英,等.冀北零星沙地杨树人工固沙林输沙率的研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2013,36(5):65-70.Ma Z W, FanS H, Guan F Y, et al. Study on sand transporting rate of different types of Poplar sand-fixation plantation in scattered sandy land of in Northern Hebei[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2013,36(5):65-70.
[2]	刘若莎,王冬梅,李平,等.青海高寒区典型人工林植物多样性、地上生物量特征及其相关性[J]. 生态学报, 2020,40(2):692-700.Liu R S, Wang D M, Li P, et al. Plant diversity, ground biomass characteristics and their relationships of typical plantations in the alpine region of Qinghai[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(2):692-700.
[3]	王晓,张克斌,程中秋,等.半干旱区湿地植被群落结构与交错带的变化分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2012,32(2):100-104.Wang X, Zhang K B, Cheng Z Q, et al. Structure and ecotone variations of wetland vegetation communities in semi-arid region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,32(2):100-104.
[4]	胡金娇,周青平,吕一河,等.青藏高原东缘半湿润沙地典型生态恢复模式的效果比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020,40(20):7410-7418.Hu J J, Zhou Q P, Lü Y H, et al. Comparison study to the effectiveness of typical ecological restoration measures in semi⁃humid sandy land in eastern Qinghai⁃Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(20):7410-7418.
[5]	张光辉.退耕驱动的近地表特性变化对土壤侵蚀的潜在影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2017,15(4):143-154.Zhang G H. Potential effects of changes in near soil surface characteristics driven by farmland abandonment on soil erosion[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,15(4):143-154.
[6]	李昂,高天鹏,张鸣,等.西北风蚀区植被覆盖对土壤风蚀动态的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014,28(6):120-123.Li A, Gao T P, Zhang M, et al. Influences of vegetation cover on dynamic changes of soil wind erosion in wind erosion region of Northwest China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(6):120-123.
[7]	王雪芹,张元明,张伟民,等.古尔班通古特沙漠生物结皮对地表风蚀作用影响的风洞实验[J]. 冰川冻土, 2004,26(5):632-638.Wang X Q, Zhang Y M, Zhang W M, et al. Wind tunnel experiment of biological crust effect on wind erodibility of sand surface in Gurbantǜnggǜt Desert, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2004,26(5):632-638.
[8]	邓艳,蒋忠诚,覃星铭,等.岩溶生态系统中不同植被枯落物对土壤理化性质的影响及岩溶效应[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(6):3307-3315.Deng Y, Jiang Z C, Qin X M, et al. Impacts of litter on physical and chemical soil properties and its karst effects on different forested Karst ecosysteM[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009,29(6):3307-3315.
[9]	Abbie U, Christopher H V, Nick G, et al. Does litter input determine carbon storage and peat organic chemistry in tropical peatlands?[J]. Geoderma, 2018,326:76-87.
[10]	孙鸿烈,郑度,姚檀栋,等.青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J]. 地理学报, 2012,67(1):3-12.Sun H L, Zheng D, Yao T D, et al. Protection and construction of the national ecological security shelter zone on Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(1):3-12.
[11]	潘红星.加强雅江流域防沙治沙工作促进西藏高原生态屏障建设[J]. 林业经济, 2007,29(8):34-36.Pan H X. Strengthen desertification combating of Yajiang basin to promote ecological barrier of Tibetan Plateau[J]. Forestry Economics, 2007,29(8):34-36.
[12]	Shen W, Li H, Sun M, et al. Dynamics of aeolian sandy land in the Yarlung Zangbo River basin of Tibet, China from 1975 to 2008[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2012,86:37-44.
[13]	Ling Z, Yang S, Wang X et al. Spatial-temporal differentiation of eolian sediments in the Yarlung Tsangpo catchment, Tibetan Plateau, and response to global climate change since the Last Glaciation[J]. Geomorphology, 2020,357:107104.
[14]	杨逸畴.雅鲁藏布江河谷风沙地貌的初步观察[J]. 中国沙漠, 1984, 4(3):16-19.Yang Y C. Aeolian landform on the banks of river valley-Case study in Yalutsangpo River Valley[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 1984, 4(3):16-19.
[15]	李森,王跃,哈斯,等.雅鲁藏布江河谷风沙地貌分类与发育问题[J]. 中国沙漠, 1997,17(4):10-18.Li S, Wang Y, Ha S, et al. Classification and development of aeolian sand landform in the Yurlung Zangbo valley[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 1997,17(4):10-18.
[16]	廖俊国,韩裕丰,赖世登,等.西藏雅鲁藏布江中游地区宜林荒地造林探讨[J]. 自然资源学报, 1992,7(1):18-26.Liao J G, Han Y F, Lai S D, et al. A discussion on the afforestation on the waste land suitable to forests in the middle reaches region of the Yarlu Zangpo river, Tibet[J]. Journal of Natural resources, 1992,7(1):18-26.
[17]	沈渭寿,李海东,林乃峰,等.雅鲁藏布江高寒河谷流动沙地适生植物种筛选和恢复效果[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(17):5609-5618.Shen W S, Li H D, Lin N F, et al. Screening trial for the suitable plant species growing on sand dunes in the alpine valley and its recovery status in the Yarlung Zangbo River basin of Tibet, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(17):5609-5618.
[18]	吴丹丹,蔡运龙.中国生态恢复效果评价研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009,28(4):622-628.Wu D D, Cai Y L. Evaluation of ecological restoration effects in China:a review[J]. Progress in Geography, 2009,28(4):622-628.
[19]	赵成章,石福习,董小刚,等.祁连山北坡退化林地植被群落的自然恢复过程及土壤特征变化[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(1):115-122.Zhao C Z, Shi F X, Dong X G, et al. Dynamics of vegetation structure and soil properties in the natural restoration process of degraded woodland on the northern slope of Qilian Mountains, northwestern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011,31(1):115-122.
[20]	马鹏飞,张正偲,论珠群培,等.雅鲁藏布江曲水-泽当段风沙活动动力条件分析与风沙灾害防治建议[J]. 中国沙漠, 2021,41(1):1-9.Ma P F, Zhang Z C, Lun Z Q P, et al. Analysis on the sand transport wind power conditions and suggestions on the sand disaster preventions in the middle reaches of Yarlung Zangbo River, China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021,41(1):1-9.
[21]	袁磊,沈渭寿,李海东,等.雅鲁藏布江中游河谷区域风沙化土地演变趋势及驱动因素[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010,26(4):301-305.Yuan L, Shen W S, Li H D, et al. Evolution and causes of aeolian desertification of the middle reaches of Yarlung Zangbo River, China[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2010,26(4):301-305.
[22]	崔光帅,张林,沈维,等.西藏雅鲁藏布江流域中段砂生槐灌丛生物量分配及碳密度[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017,41(1):53-61.Cui G S, Zhang L, Shen W, et al. Biomass allocation and carbon density of Sophora moorcroftiana shrublands in the middle reaches of Yarlung Zangbo River, Xizang, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017,41(1):53-61.
[23]	杨寒月,张光辉,张宝军.黄土丘陵区沟坡典型植物群落枯落物蓄积量及其持水性能[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019,17(3):83-90.Yang H Y, Zhang G H, Zhang B J. Litter and its water-holding properties of typical plant communities distributed on gully steep slopes in the loess hilly-gully region[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,17(3):83-90.
[24]	师阳阳,张光辉,陈云明,等.黄土丘陵区不同退耕模式林下草本变化特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2012,10(5):64-70.Shi Y Y, Zhang G H, Chen Y M, et al. Characteristics of undergrowth herbage of different restoration models in the Loess Hilly region[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,10(5):64-70.
[25]	蒯晓妍,邢鹏飞,张晓琳,等.短期放牧强度对半干旱草地植物群落多样性和生产力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018,26(6):1283-1289.Kuai X Y, Xing P F, Zhang X L, et al. Effects of short-term grazing intensity on plant community diversity and productivity in semi-arid grassland[J]. 2018,26(6):1283-1289.
[26]	吴永胜,尹瑞平,田秀民,等.毛乌素沙地南缘人工植被区生物结皮发育特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018,38(2):339-344.Wu Y S, Yin R P, Tian X M, et al. Development characteristics of biological crusts under artificial vegetation in Southern Mu Us sandy land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018,38(2):339-344.
[27]	王树梅,庞元湘,宋爱云,等.基于林龄的滨海盐碱地杨树刺槐混交林土壤理化性质及草本植物多样性动态[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(18):6539-6548.Wang S M, Pang Y X, Song A Y, et al. Soil physiochemical properties and diversity of herbaceous plants dynamic on the different ages mixed forests of Populus×Euramercana ‘Neva’ and Robinia pseucdoacacia in coastal saline-alkali area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(18):6539-6548.
[28]	Porensky L M, Elizabeth A L, Jay D, et al. Arid old-field restoration:Native perennial grasses suppress weeds and erosion, but also suppress native shrubs[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2014,184:135-144.
[29]	金艳强,包维楷.四川柏木人工林林下植被生物量与林分结构的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(20):5849-5859.Jin Y Q, Bao W K. Relationships of the understory biomass with stand structure of the Sichuan cypress plantation forests across Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(20):5849-5859.
[30]	鲁建荣,张奇,李云良,等.鄱阳湖典型洲滩湿地植物根系对水分垂向通量的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(5):2180-2189.Lu J R, Zhang Q, Li Y L, et al. Impact of typical plant roots on vertical soil water movement in Poyang Lake Wetland:a numerical study[J]. China Environmental Sciencece, 2020,40(5):2180-2189.
[31]	卢晓杰,张克斌,李瑞.北方农牧交错带生物结皮的主要影响因子探讨[J]. 水土保持研究, 2007,14(6):1-4.Lu X J, Zhang K B, Li R. The study on main factor about influence of the living beings form covers in agriculture and animal husbandry of the North Interlocks[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007,14(6):1-4.
[32]	秦福雯,康濒月,姜凤岩,等.生物土壤结皮演替对高寒草原植被结构和土壤养分的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019,28(6):1100-1107.Qin F W, Kang B Y, Jiang F Y, et al. Effects of biological soil crust succession on vegetation structure and soil nutrients in alpine steppe[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences[J]. 2019,28(6):1100-1107.
[33]	卜楠.陕北黄土区生物土壤结皮水土保持功能研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2009.Bo N. Study on the soil and water conservation function of microbiotic soil crusts on Loess area of northern Shanxi Province[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2009.
[34]	杨利云.甘肃民勤半荒漠地区人工藻结皮的固沙效果研究[D]. 兰州:兰州理工大学, 2017.Yang L Y. The research of stabilization of sands to Minqin in the semi-desert regions influenced by artificial algae crust[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University of Technology, 2017.
[35]	李新凯,卜崇峰,李宜坪,等.放牧干扰背景下藓结皮对毛乌素沙地土壤水分与风蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018,25(6):22-28.Li X K, Bu C F, Li Y P, et al. Influences of moss crusts on soil moisture and wind erosion under grazing disturbance in Mu Us sandy land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,25(6):22-28.
[36]	Liu F, Zhang G H, Sun F B, et al. Quantifying the surface covering, binding and bonding effects of biological soil crusts on soil detachment by overland flow[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2017,42(15):2640-2648.
[37]	Liu F, Zhang G H, Sun long, et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on soil detachment process by overland flow in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2016,41(7):875-883.
[38]	贾黎明.固氮树种与非固氮树种混交林研究现状[J]. 世界林业研究, 1998,11(1):21-27.Jia L M. The Review of mixtures of nitrogen-fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing tree species[J]. World Forestry Research, 1998, 11(1):21-27.
[39]	Jeňyk H, Jan H, Martin M et al. The influence of light and nutrient availability on herb layer species richness in oak-dominated forests in central Bohemia[J]. Plant Ecology, 2009,205(1):57-75.
[40]	赵栋,屠彩芸,李丹春.封育年限对干旱河谷灌丛土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(2):39-44.Zhao D, Tu C Y, Li D C. Effects of fencing time on soil physicochemical properties of sophora viciifoliain semi-arid valley[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,37(2):39-44.