青岛市在用港作机械排放特性

颜欣迪, 葛蕴珊, 王欣, 魏倩, 王春杰

中国环境科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12) : 5018-5028.

PDF(825 KB)
PDF(825 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12) : 5018-5028.
大气污染与控制

青岛市在用港作机械排放特性

  • 颜欣迪, 葛蕴珊, 王欣, 魏倩, 王春杰
作者信息 +

In-use cargo handling equipment emission characteristics of Qingdao

  • YAN Xin-di, GE Yun-shan, WANG Xin, WEI Qian, WANG Chun-jie
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

利用车载排放测试系统(PEMS)对青岛港内的港作机械污染物排放进行测定尤其是不同类型港作机械在典型工况下的排放特征,同时,计算港作机械的排放因子.结果表明,港作机械作业工况排放速率最大,是怠速工况的1.34~2.66倍,当港作机械功率高于130kW时,上述数据攀升为4.18~41.56倍,对于大功率港作机械来说,怠速工况难以较好地反映作业工况下的实际排放量.通过基于排放因子的分析,CO,THC与NOx排放因子在3个工况下均较为接近,差距在2倍以内.但是大气颗粒物(PM)排放因子体现了不同规律,部分机械作业工况下的PM排放因子是怠速工况下的10倍以上.使用时间超过4500h,污染物排放量增加,尤其是叉车的污染物排放因子高出1.64~8.25倍.港作机械实际排放水平较非道路机械平均水平高出1.5~2倍.利用双怠速检测法发现不同排放标准间CO、THC与PM排放水平差距在1.73~5.38倍,但是NOx排放水平过于相近,不能有效区分.

Abstract

The vehicle portable emission measurement system (PEMS) was used to study the pollutant emission from harbor machinery in Qingdao Port. The emission characteristics of different types of harbor machinery were summarized under different conditions, and the emission factors of harbor machinery were calculated. The results showed that emission rate of harbor machinery under working condition was 1.34~2.66 times higher than that under idle condition. When the harbor machinery power was higher than 130kW, the emission rates climbed to 4.18~41.56 times. For high-power harbor machinery, emission status under idle condition could hardly reflect the actual emissions rates under working condition. Based on the analysis of fuel-based emission factors, the trend of CO, THC and NOx emission factors were consistent under three conditions. The PM emission factors reflected different characteristics. PM emission factors under working conditions were 10 times higher than that under idle conditions. When the service time exceeded 4500 hours, the pollutant emission significantly increased, especially for forklift trucks, which was 1.64~8.25 times higher than before. The actual emission level of harbor machinery was 1.5~2 times higher than the average level of non-road machinery. It could be found that the difference of CO, THC and PM emission levels among different emission standards was 1.73~5.38 times using two-idle speed method, but the level of NOx emission was too close and undistinguishable.

关键词

车载排放测试系统(PEMS) / 港作机械 / 排放因子

Key words

emission factors / harbour machinery / portable emission measurement system (PEMS)

引用本文

导出引用
颜欣迪, 葛蕴珊, 王欣, 魏倩, 王春杰. 青岛市在用港作机械排放特性[J]. 中国环境科学. 2019, 39(12): 5018-5028
YAN Xin-di, GE Yun-shan, WANG Xin, WEI Qian, WANG Chun-jie. In-use cargo handling equipment emission characteristics of Qingdao[J]. China Environmental Science. 2019, 39(12): 5018-5028
中图分类号: X51    TK427   

参考文献

[1] Lu Q, Zheng J. Ye S, et al. Emission trends and source characteristics of SO2, NOx, PM10, and VOCs in the Pearl River Delta region from 2000 to 2009[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013,76(3):136-146.
[2] Andrew J, Robert F. A fuel-based assessment of off-road diesel engine emissions[J]. Air Waste Manag Assoc, 2000,50(11):1929-39.
[3] 孙世达,姜巍,高卫东.青岛机动车排放清单与空间分布特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(1):49-59. Sun S D, Jiang W, Gao W P, et al. Vehicle emission inventory and spatial distribution in Qingdao[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37(1):49-59.
[4] 肖军.非道路移动机械动力排放污染的控制和治理[J]. 汽车工业研究, 2017,46(1):36-40. Xiao J. Emission control from non-road mobile machinery[J]. Auto Industry Research, 2017,46(1):36-40.
[5] Durbin T D, Smith M R, Wilson R D, et al. In-use activity measurements for off-roads motorcycles and all-terrain vehicles[J]. Transp Res Part D-Transp Environ, 2004,9(12):209-19.
[6] 范武波,陈军辉,李媛,等.四川省非道路移动源大气污染物排放清单研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(12):4460-4468. Fan W B, Chen J H, Li Y, et al. Study on the non-road mobile source emission inventory for Sichuan province[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(12):4460-4468.
[7] 朱倩茹,廖程浩,刘剑筠,等.广东省典型内河港区主要大气污染物排放特征研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2015,15(3):191-195. Zhu Q R, Liao C H, Liu J J, et al. Study on emission characteristics of major air pollutants in typical inland harbor areas of Guangdong[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2015,15(3):191-195.
[8] 张意,Andre Michel,李东,等.天津市非道路移动源污染物排放清单开发[J]. 环境科学, 2017,38(11):4447-4453. Zhang Y, Andre M, Li D, et al. Development of a non-road mobile source emission inventor for Tianjin[L]. Environmental Science, 2017,38(11):4447-4453.
[9] 环境保护部公告2014年第92号,非道路移动源大气污染物排放清单编制技术指南(试行)[S]. Ministry of environmental protection announces No. 92 of 2014, Technical guidelines for the compilation of air pollutant emission inventories from non-road mobile sources (trial implementation)[S].
[10] Zhong W, Yang J H, Li R, et al. Gas emissions and particulate matter of non-road diesel engine fueled with F-T diesel with EGR[J]. Energy Sources, Part A:Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2018,41(5):542-555.
[11] 魏强,刘胜吉,尹必峰,等.生物柴油在非道路用柴油机上的实验研究[J]. 小型内燃机与摩托车, 2007,36(5):52-54. Wei Q, Liu S J, Yin B F, et al. An experimental research on application of biodiesel fuel to diesel engines[J]. Small Internal Combustion Engine and Motorcycle, 2007,36(5):52-54.
[12] Armas O, Lapuerta M, Mata C, et al. Online emissions from a vibrating roller using an ethanol-diesel blend during a railway construction[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009,23(6):2989-2996.
[13] Pirjola L, Rönkkö T, Saukko E, et al. Exhaust emissions of non-road mobile machine:Real-world and laboratory studies with diesel and HVO fuels[J]. Fuel, 2017,202(16):154-164.
[14] Rasdorf W, Frey C, LewisP, et al. Field Proceduresfor real-world measurements of emissions from diesel construction vehicles[J]. Infrastruct Syst, 2010,16(25):216-225.
[15] Zhu D Z, Nicholas J. Nussbaum, et al. Real-world PM, NOx, CO, and ultrafine particle emission factors for military non-road heavy duty diesel vehicles[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010,45(3):2603-2609.
[16] Fu M L, Ge Y S, Tan J W, et al. Characteristics of typical non-road machinery emissions in China by using portable emission measurement system[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 437(11)255-261.
[17] 付明亮.非道路柴油机械排放特征研究[D]. 北京理工大学, 2013. Fu M L. Study on emission characteristics of non-road diesel engines[D]. Beijing Institute of Technology, 2013.
[18] Frey H C, Rasdorf W, Lewis P. Conprehensive field study of fuel use and emissions of nonroad diesel construction equipment[J]. Transp Res Rec, 2010:69-76.
[19] 钟仕钰,张甦.双怠速法机动车尾气排放检测结果的影响因素分析[J]. 环境监控与预警, 2016,8(1):35-37. Zhong S Y, Zhang S. Analysis on factors that influence the testing resylt of motor vehicle exhaust emission of the double idle speed method[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning, 2016,8(1):35-37.
[20] 李菁元.双怠速法对汽车排放识别能力研究[C]//中国汽车工程学会.2014中国汽车工程学会年会论文集.中国汽车工程学会, 2014:4. Li J Y. Research on the ability to identify vehicle emissions testing by two-speed idle[C]//Society of Automotive Engineers of China. Papers Collection of the Annual Meeting of China Automotive Engineering Society in 2014. Society of Automotive Engineers of China, 2014:4.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0208005)


PDF(825 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/