RSI-MO工艺对沼气脱硫的影响及微生物种群分析

阮仁俊; 李家乐; 欧坤轩; 赵昌爽; 孙俊伟; 操家顺

PDF(923 KB)

中国环境科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4) : 1909-1916.

环境微生物

RSI-MO工艺对沼气脱硫的影响及微生物种群分析

阮仁俊^1,2, 李家乐¹, 欧坤轩¹, 赵昌爽^1,2, 孙俊伟¹, 操家顺²

作者信息 +

Influence of RSI-MO process on biogas desulfurization and analysis of microbial communities

RUAN Ren-jun^1,2, LI Jia-le¹, OU Kun-xuan¹, ZHAO Chang-shuang^1,2, SUN Jun-wei¹, CAO Jia-shun²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为实现剩余污泥厌氧消化沼气原位深度脱硫，采用向反应器中嵌入最佳剂量（20g/L）废铁屑并引入微氧条件，构建废铁屑-微氧（RSI-MO）消化工艺，探索其对原位脱硫的影响.研究分7阶段，P1阶段对照组，P2阶段加入RSI，P3~P7阶段逐步提高O₂剂量.结果表明，MO效应激发硫氧化菌（SOB）生物脱硫，促发RSI化学腐蚀而生成铁硫沉淀物.P1~P7阶段，RSI与MO交互作用可促进水解酸化，但O₂剂量过高会抑制产甲烷微生物活性，造成VFAs积累.为研究RSI与MO交互作用对微生物群落多样性和丰度的影响，取P1、P2和P6阶段污泥样品进行高通量测序发现，RSI投加有益于产氢型微生物（Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans）、产乙酸型微生物（Roseomonas lacus、Sporomusa silvacetica）、产甲烷微生物（Methanoculleus palmolei、Methanolinea tarda、Methanosarcina mazei、Methanosaeta concilii、Methanococcus aeolicus）的生长.MO效应可激活SOB的活性，强化生物脱硫作用.

Abstract

To achieve in-situ deep desulfurization of biogas derived from waste-activated sludge (WAS) anaerobic digestion, an integrated approach of optimal rusty scrap iron addition (20g/L) with micro-oxygen injection (RSI-MO) was constructed to disclose their combined influences on the performance of in-situ desulfurization. The operation of semi-continuous anaerobic/microaerobic reactor included seven stages (P1~P7). The operation of first stage (P1) was set as the control. The addition of RSI was started at the second stage (P2). The oxygen was introduced in P3 stage, and the concentrations were gradually increased from P3 to P7 stages. The results showed that MO induced the microbial sulfide oxidation by stimulating sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB), and simultaneously promoted the chemical corrosion on iron to generate iron-sulfide precipitation. From P1 to P7, the synergistic effects of RSI and MO contributed to the hydrolytic-acidogenic efficiency. However, the overdose of oxygen inhibited the activities of methanogenic microorganisms, which caused the accumulation of VFAs. To demonstrated the combined effects of RSI and MO on the microbial diversity and abundance, the microbial communities in sludge samples of P1, P2 and P6 were analyzed via the high-throughput sequencing technology. The microbial analysis suggested that the RSI addition stimulated the activity of hydrogen-producing microorganisms (Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans), acetate-producing microorganisms (Roseomonas lacus, Sporomusa silvacetica) and methanogenic microorganisms (Methanoculleus palmolei, Methanolinea tarda, Methanosarcina mazei, Methanosaeta concilii, Methanococcus aeolicus) while the MO stimulated the activity of SOB for biological desulphurization enhancement.

导出引用

阮仁俊, 李家乐, 欧坤轩, 赵昌爽, 孙俊伟, 操家顺. RSI-MO工艺对沼气脱硫的影响及微生物种群分析[J]. 中国环境科学. 2021, 41(4): 1909-1916

RUAN Ren-jun, LI Jia-le, OU Kun-xuan, ZHAO Chang-shuang, SUN Jun-wei, CAO Jia-shun. Influence of RSI-MO process on biogas desulfurization and analysis of microbial communities[J]. China Environmental Science. 2021, 41(4): 1909-1916

中图分类号： X172

参考文献

[1] Wei Y F, Yuan H R, Wachemo A C, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and liquid fraction of digestate (LFD) pretreated corn stover:Pretreatment process optimization and evolution of microbial community structure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,296:122282.
[2] Cao J J, Zhang L, Hong J Y, et al. Different ferric dosing strategies could result in different control mechanisms of sulfide and methane production in sediments of gravity sewers[J]. Water Research, 2019, 164:114914.
[3] Cecilia P, Felipe A M, Giulio M. The role of organic load and ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion of tannery fleshing[J]. Water Resources and Industry, 2018,19:25-34.
[4] Liu Y, Wachemo A C, Yuan H R, et al. Anaerobic digestion performance and microbial community structure of corn stover in three-stage continuously stirred tank reactors[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,287:121339.
[5] Ashley J B, Stephanie L, Walter M, et al. Methane and hydrogen sulfide production during co-digestion of forage radish and dairy manure[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2015,80:44-51.
[6] 李小兰,周芸,陈志燕,等.针铁矿强化剩余污泥与烟草废弃物厌氧发酵的研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(6):2475-2482. Li X L, Zhou Y, Chen Z Y, et al. Enhanced anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge and tobacco waste using Goethite[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(6):2475-2482.
[7] 苏良湖,张明珠,张龙江,等.水合氧化铁对污泥厌氧消化过程的硫化氢控制[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(4):1349-1357. Su L H, Zhang M Z, Zhang L J, et al. The removal of hydrogen sulphide by ferrihydrite during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017,37(4):1349-1357.
[8] Zhu T T, Cheng H Y, Yang L H, et al. Coupled sulfur and iron(Ⅱ) carbonate-driven autotrophic denitrification for significantly enhanced nitrate removal[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019,53(3):1545-1554.
[9] Ruan D N, Zhou Z, Pang H J, et al. Enhancing methane production of anaerobic sludge digestion by microaeration:Enzyme activity stimulation, semi-continuous reactor validation and microbial community analysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,289:121643.
[10] Zhou X J, Yin J G, Chen Y L, et al. Simultaneous removal of sulfur and iron by the seed precipitation of digestion solution for high-sulfur bauxite[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2018,181:7-15.
[11] Meng J, Li J L, Li J Z, et al. Enhanced nitrogen removal from piggery wastewater with high NH₄⁺ and low COD/TN ratio in a novel upflow microaerobic biofilm reactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018,249:935-942.
[12] Tripathia N, Singhb R S, Hillsa C D. Microbial removal of sulphur from petroleum coke (petcoke)[J]. Fule, 2019,235:1501-1505.
[13] Chu L B, Yan S T, Xing X H, et al. Progress and perspectives of sludge ozonation as a powerful pretreatment method for minimization of excess sludge production[J]. Water Research, 2009,43(7):1811-1822.
[14] 阮仁俊,李运晴,项经纬,等.废铁屑对剩余污泥厌氧消化特性的影响[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020,33(9):179-185. Ruan R J, Li Y Q, Xiang J W, et al. Influence of rusty scrap iron on the anaerobic digestion performance of waste-activated sludge[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020,33(9):179-185.
[15] Ramos I, Díaz I, Fdz-Polanco M. The role of the headspace in hydrogen sulfide removal during microaerobic digestion of sludge[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2012,66:2258-2264.
[16] Li Y F, Guo J B, Li H B, et al. Effect of dissolved oxygen on simultaneous removal of ammonia, nitrate and phosphorus via biological aerated filter with sulfur and pyrite as composite fillers[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,296:122340.
[17] Alkaya E, Demirer G N. Anaerobic acidification of sugar-beet processing wastes:effect of operational parameters[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2011,35(1):32-39.
[18] 黄绍福,叶捷,周顺桂.赤铁矿抑制硫酸盐废水厌氧消化产甲烷过程中硫化氢形成与机制[J]. 环境科学, 2019,40(4):1857-1864. Huang S F, Ye J, Zhou S G. Effect of hematite on the inhibition of hydrogen sulfide formation and its mechanism during anaerobic digestion and methanogenesis of sulfate wastewater[J]. Environmental Science, 2019,40(4):1857-1864.
[19] Shokouhi M, Jalili A H, Zoghi A T. Experimental investigation of hydrogen sulfide solubility in aqueous sulfolane solution[J]. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2017,106:232-242.
[20] Amato K R, Yeoman C J, Kent A, et al. Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) gastrointestinal microbiomes[J]. The ISME Journal, 2013,7:1344-1353.
[21] Wang Y, Sheng H F, He Y, et al. Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of illumina tags[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012,78:8264-8271.
[22] Cadillo-Quiroz H, Yavitt J B, Zinder S H. Methanosphaerula palustris gen. nov., sp. nov., a hydrogenotrophic methanogen isolated from a minerotrophic fen peatland[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2009,59:928-935.
[23] Dunfield P F, Khmelenina V N, Suzina N E, et al. Methylocella silvestris sp. nov., a novel methanotroph isolated from an acidic forest cambisol[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2003,53:1231-1239.
[24] Tarlera S, Stams A J M. Degradation of proteins and amino acids by Caloramator proteoclasticus in pure culture and in coculture with Methanobacterium thermoformicicum Z245[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1999,53:133-138.
[25] Kumar A, Samadder S R. Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste:A review[J]. Energy, 2020,197:117253.
[26] Ying X, Guo K, Chen W, et al. The impact of electron donors and anode potentials on the anode-respiring bacteria community[J]. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2017,101:7997-8005.
[27] Sachan R, Singh A K. Comparison of microbial influenced corrosion in presence of iron oxidizing bacteria (strains DASEWM1and DASEWM2)[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020,256:119438.
[28] Díaz I, Pérez S I, Ferrero E M, et al. Effect of oxygen dosing point and mixing on the microaerobic removal of hydrogen sulphide in sludge digesters[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010,102:3768-3775.
[29] Kryachko Y, Semler D, Vogrinetz J, et al. Hemmingsen. enrichment and identification of biosurfactant-producing oil field microbiota utilizing electron acceptors other than oxygen and nitrate[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2016,231:9-15.
[30] Potivichayanon S, Pokethitiyook M, Kruatrachue M. Hydrogen sulfide removal by a novel fixed-film bioscrubber system[J]. Process Biochemical, 2006,41:708-715.