Analysis of the performance of carbon emissions trading right in China——The evaluation based on the difference-in-difference model
FAN Dan1,2, WANG Wei-guo1,2, LIANG Pei-feng1
1. Department of Economics, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, China;
2. Center for Econometric Analysis and Forecasting, Dongbei University of Finance & Economics, Dalian 116025, China
The paper examined whether the mechanism of pilot project for carbon emissions trading right could promote the low-carbon economy transformation in China after controlling some important explanatory variables such as the environmental regulation. The results showed that in the global DEA framework, the industrial total factor productivity lacked of ability to enhance both in the provinces which launched the pilot project for carbon emissions trading right and in those which didn't during the inspection period. From the point of potential double dividend, the measures to reduce emissions were not so flexible in the non-pilot provinces as those in the pilot provinces, so that there was still a large release space for the economic dividend and environmental dividend in the non-pilot provinces. The policy effect analysis based on the difference-in-difference model of kernel matching presented that the mechanism of carbon emissions trading right could reduce the total amount of carbon emissions at the present stage to some extent, but its impact on economic output was weak; the pilot project didn't improve the industrial total factor productivity in the pilot provinces while it enhanced significantly the technological progress rate. Therefore, the mechanism of carbon emissions trading right supported the ‘weak Porter hypothesis’ for technological innovation to a certain extent, but didn't give evidences to support the ‘strong Porter hypothesis’ for total factor productivity. It should be a necessary measure to realize the low-carbon economy transformation in China.
范丹, 王维国, 梁佩凤. 中国碳排放交易权机制的政策效果分析——基于双重差分模型的估计[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(6): 2383-2392.
FAN Dan, WANG Wei-guo, LIANG Pei-feng. Analysis of the performance of carbon emissions trading right in China——The evaluation based on the difference-in-difference model. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2017, 37(6): 2383-2392.
Lanoie Paul, Patry Michel, Lajeunesse Richard. Environmental regulation and productivity:testing the porter hypothesis[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2008,302:121-128.
[3]
Rassier Dylan G, Earnhart Dietrich. Does the Porter hypothesis explain expected future financial performance? The effect of clean water regulation on chemical manufacturing firms[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010,453:353-377.
[4]
Porter M E. America's green strategy[J]. Scientific American, 1991,264(4):168.
[5]
Domazlicky Bruce R, Weber William L. Does environmental protection lead to slower productivity growth in the chemical industry?[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2004,283:301-324.
Kemp R, Pontoglio S. The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments-A typical case of the blind men and the elephant[A]. Paper for DIME WP 2.5 Workshop on empirical analyses of environmental innovation[R]. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe, 2008,(1):17-18.
[9]
Requate T, Unold W. Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology:Will the true ranking please stand up?[J]. European Economic Review, 2003,47:125-146.
[10]
Brannlund R, Chung Y, Fare R, et al. Emissions trading and profitability:The swedish pulp and paper industry[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1998,12:345-356.
[11]
Fare R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka Jr C A. Tradable permits and unrealized gains from trade[J]. Energy Economics,, 2013,40:416-424.
[12]
Jefferson G H, Tanaka S, Yin W. Environmental regulation and industrial performance:Evidence from unexpected externalities in China[A]. Working Paper, 2013.
Zhao Xiaoli, Zhao Yue, Zeng Saixing, et al. Corporate behavior and competitiveness:impact of environmental regulation on Chinese firms[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015,86(1):311-322.
[15]
Dong-hyun Oh. A global malmquist-luenberger productivity index[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2010,34(3):183-198.
[16]
Chung Y H, Fare R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and undesirable outputs:a directional distance function approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1997,51(3):229-240.
Ehrlich P R,Holdren J P. Impact of population growth[J]. Science, New Series, 1971,171:1212-1217.
[20]
Kaya Yoichi. Impact of carbon dioxide emission on GNP growth:interpretation of proposed scenarios[R]. Paris:Presentation to the Energy and Industry Subgroup,Response Strategies Working Group, IPCC, 1989.
[21]
国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[J]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2011-2015.
[22]
国家统计局工业统计司.中国工业经济统计年鉴[J]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2011-2015.
[23]
国家统计局能源统计司.中国能源统计年鉴[J]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2011-2015.
[24]
国家统计局人口和就业统计司.中国劳动统计年鉴[J]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2011-2015.
[25]
Domazlicky B, Weber W. Does environmental protection lead to slower productivity growth in the chemical industry?[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2004,28:301-324.
[26]
Adam B Jaffe, Karen Palmer. Environmental regulation and innovation:A panel data study, The Review of Economics and Statistics[J]. Review of Economics & Statistics, 1997,79(4):610-619.