Enhanced chromium removal by zerovalent iron with the presence of sulfate anion
HU Yi-hong1, HUANG Ting-lin1, SUN Yuan-kui2
1. School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China;
2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Generally, zerovalent iron (ZVI) is considered to have low intrinsic reactivity toward Cr (VI) removal, and on the other hand, Cr (VI) could also cause surface passivation of ZVI. To address this issue, sulfate was introduced into a ZVI column system and its effect on ZVI performance and the corresponding mechanisms was investigated in depth. According to the results of this work, without the presence of SO42-, little Cr (VI) could be removed by ZVI column, and the effluent concentrations of Cr (VI) and total Cr would quickly exceed the maximum contaminant limitation of drinking water. While, upon the addition of 1~3 mmol/L SO42-, both the concentrations of Cr(VI) and total Cr deceased rapidly and met the drinking water standards. Furthermore, this good ZVI performance kept unchanged during the following running time (~240h) in this work, and more longer duration could be expected. The XPS analysis of the reacted ZVI samples indicated Cr(VI) could be reduced to Cr(Ⅲ), implying Cr(VI) reduction was its main removal mechanism by ZVI. With respect to the role of SO42-, it was believed to be able to accelerate ZVI corrosion and thus enhance the Cr(VI) reduction.
胡艺泓, 黄廷林, 孙远奎. 硫酸根离子强化零价铁去除Cr(Ⅵ)的试验研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(4): 1318-1323.
HU Yi-hong, HUANG Ting-lin, SUN Yuan-kui. Enhanced chromium removal by zerovalent iron with the presence of sulfate anion. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2018, 38(4): 1318-1323.
EPA. U. S. Field applications of in situ remediation technologies:Permeable reactive barriers[M]. Washing, DC:EPA, 1999.
[2]
Katz S, Salem H. The biological and environmental chemistry of chromium[M]. Weinheim:VCH Publisher, 1994.
[3]
Auden W H. Handbook of groundwater remediation using permeable reactive barriers-applications to radionuclides, trace metals, and nutrients[M]. 2002.
[4]
Pratt A, Blowes D, Ptacek C. Products of chromate reduction on proposed subsurface remediation material[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1997,31(31):2492-2498.
Zazo J, Paull J, Jaffe P. Influence of plants on the reduction of hexavalent chromium in wetland sediments[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2008,156(1):29-35.
[9]
Guan X, Sun Y, Qin H, et al. The limitations of applying zero-valent iron technology in contaminants sequestration and the corresponding countermeasures:The development in zero-valent iron technology in the last two decades (1994~2014)[J]. Water Research, 2015,75:224-248.
[10]
Noubactep C. The fundamental mechanism of aqueous contaminant removal by metallic iron[J]. Water Sa, 2010, 4738(4738):663-670.