再生水中阴离子表面活性剂对土壤结构与水流运动的影响

盛丰, 李忠润, 方娴静, 文鼎, 胡国华, 谌宏伟

中国环境科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10) : 4531-4539.

PDF(551 KB)
PDF(551 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10) : 4531-4539.
土壤污染与控制

再生水中阴离子表面活性剂对土壤结构与水流运动的影响

  • 盛丰1,2,3, 李忠润1,2, 方娴静1,2, 文鼎1,2, 胡国华1,3, 谌宏伟1,3
作者信息 +

Effects of anionic surfactant in reclaimed water on soil structural properties and water flow characteristics

  • SHENG Feng1,2,3, LI Zhong-run1,2, FANG Xian-jing1,2, WEN Ding1,2, HU Guo-hua1,3, SHEN Hong-wei1,3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为揭示再生水回灌农田所引入的阴离子表面活性剂对土壤结构性质与水流运动特征的影响,通过室内灌水入渗试验研究了再生水中阴离子表面活性剂浓度(0、0.001、0.01和0.1倍临界胶束浓度)、灌水频率(1d1次、2d1次、3d1次)、再生水-清水交替灌溉模式(纯再生水灌溉、再生水-清水交替灌溉)条件下受灌土壤容重、非毛管孔隙比、团聚体稳定性、土壤斥水性、地表入渗性能和入渗水流运动非均匀特征的变化规律.结果表明,随着再生水中的阴离子表面活性剂浓度的增大和灌溉频率的增大,受灌土壤容重减小、非毛管孔隙比和土壤团聚体稳定性增大、土壤斥水性增强、地表入渗能力降低、优先流运动非均匀程度增大,从而也增大了农田灌水管理难度;当再生水-清水交替灌溉中的清水淋洗频率增大时,受灌土壤容重增大、非毛管孔隙比和土壤团聚体稳定性降低,但却降低了土壤的斥水性、增大了地表入渗能力并降低了土壤优先流运动的非均匀程度,有利于节省灌水时间、提高灌水效率.

Abstract

Irrigation experiments with three different irrigation conditions, i.e. different concentration of anionic surfactant in irrigation water (i.e. 0critical micelle concentration (CMC), 0.001CMC, 0.01CMC and 0.1CMC), irrigation frequencies (irrigated every day, once every two days, and once every three days), and reclaimed water and freshwater alternative irrigation schedules (irrigated with reclaimed water only, and irrigated with reclaimed water and freshwater alternatively) were conducted in laboratory with man-filled soil columns to study the effects of surfactant in reclaimed water on soil bulk density, porosity structure, aggregate stability, soil water repellency, surface infiltrability and preferential flow heterogeneity. Higher concentration of anionic surfactant in reclaimed water and higher irrigation frequency with lower irrigation quota both lead to smaller soil bulk density, greater non-capillary porosity ratio and normalized mean weight diameter of soil aggregate, higher soil water repellency, worse surface infiltrability, and stronger preferential flow behavior, which increased the difficulty of farmland management; higher frequency of freshwater flush in reclaimed water and freshwater alternative irrigation increased soil bulk density, decreased non-capillary porosity ratio and normalized mean weight diameter of soil aggregate, reduced soil water repellency, enhancing surface infiltrability, and decreased preferential flow heterogeneity, which decreased the time for farmland irrigation and increased irrigation efficiency.

关键词

地表入渗能力 / 土壤斥水性 / 团聚体稳定性 / 阴离子表面活性剂 / 优先流 / 再生水

Key words

anionic surfactant / preferential flow / reclaimed water / soil aggregate stability / soil surface infiltrability / soil water repellency

引用本文

导出引用
盛丰, 李忠润, 方娴静, 文鼎, 胡国华, 谌宏伟. 再生水中阴离子表面活性剂对土壤结构与水流运动的影响[J]. 中国环境科学. 2020, 40(10): 4531-4539
SHENG Feng, LI Zhong-run, FANG Xian-jing, WEN Ding, HU Guo-hua, SHEN Hong-wei. Effects of anionic surfactant in reclaimed water on soil structural properties and water flow characteristics[J]. China Environmental Science. 2020, 40(10): 4531-4539
中图分类号: X53   

参考文献

[1] 高旭阔,严梦婷.基于三方博弈的再生水回用市场演化路径分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(12):5361-5367. Gao X K, Yan M T. Evolution path of reclaimed water reuse based on three-party game[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(12):5361-5367.
[2] Zalacáin D, Bienes R, Sastre-Merlín A, et al. Influence of reclaimed water irrigation in soil physical properties of urban parks:A case study in Madrid (Spain)[J]. Catena, 2019,180:333-340.
[3] Ali N, Bilal M, Khan A, et al. Effective exploitation of anionic, nonionic, and nanoparticle-stabilized surfactant foams for petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil remediation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,704:135391.
[4] 姜霞,高学晟,应佩峰,等.表面活性剂的增溶作用及在土壤中的行为[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013,14(11):2072-2076. Jiang X, Gao X C, Ying P F, et al. Solubilization and behavior of surfactants in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 14(11):2072-2076.
[5] 赵永杰.全球表面活性剂原料及产品最新发展现状(一)[J]. 中国洗涤用品工业, 2018,(12):74-82. Zhao Y J. The update on global surfactant material and product development status quo[J]. China Cleaning Industry, 2018,(12):74-82.
[6] Jia L Q, Ou Z Q, Ouyang Z Y, et al. Ecological behavior of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in soil-plant systems[J]. Pedosphere, 2005,15(2):216-224.
[7] Tadayonnejad M, Mosaddeghi M R, Ghorbani Dashtaki Sh. Changing soil hydraulic properties and water repellency in a pomegranate orchard irrigated with saline water by applying polyacrylamide[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2017,188:12-20.
[8] 陈玉成,熊双莲,熊治廷.表面活性剂强化重金属污染植物修复的可行性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2004,13(2):243-246. Chen Y C, Xiong S L, Xiong Z Y. Feasibility of surfactants-enhanced phytoremediation of heavy metal contamination[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2004,13(2):243-246.
[9] Fisseha A, Evans M. Biosurfactant from paenibacillus dendritiformis and its application in assisting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon(PAH) and motor oil sludge removal from contaminated soil and sand media[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015,98(9):354-364.
[10] Flury M, Flühler H, Jury W A, et al. Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water:A field study[J]. Water Resources Research, 1994,30(7):1945-1954.
[11] 何子淼,肖培青,郝仕龙,等.黄丘区野外草被坡面土壤入渗参数变化规律与模拟研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,(2):74-79. He Z M, Xiao P Q, Hao S L, et al. Study on the change and simulation of soil infiltration parameters on the field grass slope in the Loess Hilly Region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,(2):74-79.
[12] He F, Pan Y, Tan L, et al. Study of the water transportation characteristics of marsh saline soil in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,574:716-723.
[13] 盛丰,王康,张仁铎,等.土壤非均匀水流运动与溶质运移的两区-两阶段模型[J]. 水利学报, 2015,46(4):433-442,451. Sheng F, Wang K, Zhang R D, et al. Modeling the heterogeneous soil water flow and solute transport by two-region-two-stage model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015,46(4):433-442,451.
[14] 盛丰,张敏,薛如霞,等.灌溉水中盐分对土壤结构性质及水流运动特征的影响[J]. 水利学报, 2019,50(3):346-355. Sheng F, Zhang M, Xue R X, et al. Effects of salt in irrigation water on soil structural properties and water flow characteristics[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2019,50(3):346-355.
[15] Chen Z, Wang R, Han P. Soil water repellency of the artificial soil and natural soil in rocky slopes as affected by the drought stress and polyacrylamide[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,619-620:401-409.
[16] Lehrsch G A, Sojka R E. Water quality and surfactant effects on the water repellency of a sandy soil[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011,403(1/2):58-65.
[17] Wang P, Keller A. Partitioning of hydrophobic pesticides within a soil-water-anionic surfactant system[J]. Water Research, 2009,43(3):706-714.
[18] Zígolo M A, Irazusta V P, Rajal V B. Correlation between initial biodegradability determined by docking studies and structure of alkylbenzene sulfonates:A new tool for intelligent design of environmentally friendly anionic surfactants[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,728:138731.
[19] Mao X H, Jiang R, Xiao W. Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils:A Review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014,11(4):17-32.
[20] Rao P, He M. Adsorption of anionic and nonionic surfactant mixtures from synthetic detergents on soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2006,63(7):1214-1221.
[21] Mathurasa L, Tongcumpou C, Sabatini D, et al. Anionic surfactant enhanced bacterial degradation of tributyltin in soil[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2012,75:7-14.
[22] 吴延磊,李子忠,龚元石.两种常用方法测定土壤斥水性结果的相关性研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007,(7):8-13. Wu Y L, Li Z Z, Gong Y S. Correlation of soil water repellency measurements from two typical methods[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007,(7):8-13.
[23] Rye C, Smettem K. The effect of water repellent soil surface layers on preferential flow and bare soil evaporation[J]. Geoderma, 2017,289:142-149.
[24] LY/T 1215-1999森林土壤水分-物理性质的测定[S]. LY/T 1215-1999 Determination of forest soil water-physical properties[S].
[25] Morris C, Mooney S J, Young S D. Sorption and desorption characteristics of the dye tracer, Brilliant Blue FCF, in sandy and clay soils[J]. Geoderma, 2008,146:434-438.
[26] Gonzalez M, Miglioranza K, Aizpún J, et al. Assessing pesticide leaching and desorption in soils with different agricultural activities from Argentina (Pampa and Patagonia)[J]. Chemosphere, 2010, 81(3):351-358.
[27] 戚兴超.离子型表面活性剂在土壤上的吸附及其对土壤性质的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2016. Qi X C. Adsorption of ionic surfactants on the soils and their effects on the properties of soils[D]. Taian:ShanDong Agricultural University, 2016.
[28] Debano L F. Water repellency in soils:a historical overview[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2000,231-232(6):4-32.
[29] 袁德玲,张玉龙,唐首锋,等.不同灌溉方式对保护地土壤水稳性团聚体的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009,23(3):125-128,134. Yuan D L, Zhang Y L, Tang S F, et al. Effect on soil water-stable aggregates of different irrigation methods in protected field[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservatio, 2009,23(3):125-128,134.
[30] 盛丰,方娴静,吴丹,等.灌溉水中悬浮固体对土壤水分入渗性能的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019,35(21):98-106. Sheng F, Fang X J, Wu D, et al. Effect of suspended soils in irrigation water on soil water infiltration[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019,35(21):98-106.

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(51579020);湖南省教育厅科学研究项目重点项目(17A009)

PDF(551 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/