A complete numerical model was developed for the dust removal process in the two-stage electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Numerical simulation method was used to study velocity distribution, particle charging characteristics, particle moving tracks and other physical processes which were difficult to measure directly. The electric field was analyzed using Poisson equation, current continuity equation and homogeneous electric field equation. Fluid flow was elucidated using N-S equation and the standard k-ε turbulent model. Particle tracks were described using Lagrangian method. The accuracy of the numerical model was verified by comparing the numerical results with the experimental data of the cross-sectional velocity and the particle removal rate. Numerical simulation results showed that the fluid flow distribution in two-stage ESP was sensitive to the inlet wind speed. The proportion of charge with different charging methods was determined by particle diameter. And the particles of different sizes had different dominant charging methods. Moreover, the approach of particles to plates was caused by the interaction of the electric force and the drag force in pre-charger, while the approach in dust collection part was dominated by electric force. It was also found that the inlet velocity influenced the particle tracks by changing particle advance speed and internal flow field.
Skodras G, Kaldis S P, Sofialidis D, et al. Particulate removal via electrostatic precipitators-CFD simulation[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2006,87(7):623-631.
[5]
Niu J L, Tung T C W, Burnett J. Quantification of dust removal and ozone emission of ionizer air-cleaners by chamber testing[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2001,51:20-24.
[6]
Hyun O, Baek M, Moon J, et al. Performance evaluation of two-stage electrostatic air filter with low-ozone emission corona charger[J]. Particulate Science & Technology, 2016,35(1):71-76.
[7]
Kim H J, Han B, Kim Y J, et al. Submicrometer particle removal indoors by a novel electrostatic precipitator with high clean air delivery rate, low ozone emissions, and carbon fiber ionizer[J]. Indoor Air, 2013,23(5):369.
[8]
Kim Y J, Han B, Chang G W, et al. Performance of Ultrafine Particle Collection of a Two-Stage ESP Using a Novel Mixing Type Carbon Brush Charger and Parallel Collection Plates[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2017,53(1):466-473.
[9]
Wen T Y, Wang H C, Krichtafovitch I, et al. Novel electrodes of an electrostatic precipitator for air filtration[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2015,73:117-124.
[10]
Sobczyk A T, Marchewicz A, Krupa A, et al. Enhancement of collection efficiency for fly ash particles (PM2. 5) by unipolar agglomerator in two-stage electrostatic precipitator[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2017,187:91-01.
[11]
Jaworek A, Marchewicz A, Krupa A, et al. Dust particles precipitation in AC/DC electrostatic precipitator[J]. Journal of Physics Conference, 2015,646(1):012031.
Nikas K S P, Varonos A A, Bergeles G C. Numerical simulation of the flow and the collection mechanisms inside a laboratory scale electrostatic precipitator[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2005,63(5):423-443.
[15]
Launder B E, Spalding D B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 1974,103(2):269-289.
[16]
Long Z W, Yao Q. Evaluation of various particle charging models for simulating particle dynamics in electrostatic precipitators[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2010,41(7):702-718.
Yamamoto T, Morita Y, Fujishima H, et al. Three-dimensional EHD simulation for point corona electrostatic precipitator based on laminar and turbulent models[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2006,64(7-9):628-633.