三峡库区典型粮菜轮作系统施肥管理及环境代价评价

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (647 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为明确三峡库区两种典型轮作系统的施肥管理现状及其环境代价，随机抽样选取三峡库区腹地涪陵区175个农户进行施肥管理现状调查，从生产力、肥料种类与用量、环境代价和经济效益四个方面进行对比分析榨菜-玉米和榨菜-水稻两种典型粮菜轮作模式，同时设计情景分析，评价优化施肥及新型肥料的施用在降低环境代价方面的作用.结果显示，两个粮菜轮作系统生产力差异不显著，但施肥总量榨菜-玉米轮作系统比榨菜-水稻轮作系统高68.4%，主要原因是玉米种植过程中的氮肥、磷肥和钾肥用量比水稻种植分别高出305kg/hm²、92.3kg/hm²和66.6kg/hm².在施肥过程中，单位收益（每1000元）上榨菜-玉米轮作产生的活性氮损失、酸化效应和富营养化效应分别比榨菜-水稻轮作高147%、73.1%和146%，温室气体效应比榨菜-水稻轮作低38.9%；单位面积（每hm²）上榨菜-玉米轮作体系造成的活性氮损失、酸化效应和富营养化效应比榨菜-水稻轮作体系分别高出44.6%、27.1%和44.1%，而造成的温室气体效应比榨菜-水稻轮作体系低33.3%.运用情景分析方法模拟发现，优化施肥量可以显著的降低环境代价，在优化施肥基础上添加硝化抑制剂可以进一步降低整个轮作体系的活性氮损失、温室气体效应和富营养化效应.本研究为实现源头减量技术防控面源污染提供了理论支撑.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	武秋甫
	王孝忠
	陈新平
	刘敦一

关键词 ：粮菜轮作, 施肥管理, 环境代价, 情景分析, 三峡库区

Abstract：This study assessed the current status of fertilization management and its environmental cost for two typical grain-vegetable rotation systems in Three Gorges Reservoir area, which can further provide a scientific and reasonable basis for the green and sustainable development of regional crop rotation systems. A total of 175 farmers in Fuling District of Three Gorges Reservoir area were randomly selected to conduct a survey about the current situation of fertilization management. Two typical grain-vegetable rotation systems including mustard-maize and mustard-rice were compared in term of productivity, fertilizer type and rate, environmental cost and economic benefit. In addition, a scenario analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of optimized fertilization and use of new fertilizer types on reducing environmental costs. Results showed no significant difference in productivity between the two grain-vegetable rotation systems. The total amount of fertilization in the mustard-maize rotation system was 68.4% higher than that in the mustard-rice rotation system. Specifically, the amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers in the maize growing season were 305kg/hm², 92.3kg/hm² and 66.6kg/hm², which were greater than those in the rice growing season. During fertilization process, reactive nitrogen loss, acidification potential and eutrophication potential based on 1000-Yuan profit were 147%, 73.1% and 146%, respectively, greater for the mustard-maize rotation than for the mustard-rice rotation. In contrast global warming potential was 38.9% less for the former. Reactive nitrogen loss, acidification potential and eutrophication potential based on per hectare were 44.6%, 27.1% and 44.1%, respectively, greater for the mustard-maize rotation than for the mustard-rice rotation system, whereas global warming potential was 33.3% less for the former. Results of scenario analysis indicated that optimization of fertilizer application could significantly reduce environmental cost. Optimal fertilization strategy with addition of nitrification inhibitors could further reduce reactive nitrogen loss, global warming potential and eutrophication potential of whole rotation system. This study provides theoretical support for the development of source reduction technology to prevent and control non-point source pollution.

Key words： grain-vegetable rotation fertilization management environmental cost scenario analysis Three Gorges Reservoir area

收稿日期: 2020-07-20

PACS:

X53

基金资助:国家重点研发计划（2018YFD0800600）；中央高校基本业务费专项资金资助（XDJK2019C063）

通讯作者: 刘敦一,副教授,liudy1989@swu.edu.cn E-mail: liudy1989@swu.edu.cn

作者简介: 武秋甫(1995-),男,内蒙古包头人,西南大学硕士研究生,主要从事养分资源管理与农业面源污染研究.

引用本文:

武秋甫, 王孝忠, 陈新平, 刘敦一. 三峡库区典型粮菜轮作系统施肥管理及环境代价评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(3): 1272-1281. WU Qiu-fu, WANG Xiao-zhong, CHEN Xin-ping, LIU Dun-yi. Fertilization and environmental cost assessment of typical grain-vegetable rotation systems in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2021, 41(3): 1272-1281.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V41/I3/1272

[1]	Zhang T, Yang Y, Ni J, et al. Construction of an integrated technology system for control agricultural non-point source pollution in the Three Gorges Reservoir Areas[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020,295:106919.
[2]	孟庆华,杨林章.三峡库区不同土地利用方式的养分流失研究[J]. 生态学报, 2000,20(6):1028-1033. Meng Q H, Yang L Z. Nutrient losses in different land use types in the Three Gorge Reservior Area (TGRA)[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20(6):1028-1033.
[3]	Zhang Y, Xie D, Ni J, et al. Optimizing phosphate fertilizer application to reduce nutrient loss in a mustard (Brassica juncea var. tumida)-maize (Zeamays L.) rotation system in Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019,190:78-85.
[4]	阎建忠,卓仁贵,谢德体,等.不同生计类型农户的土地利用——三峡库区典型村的实证研究[J]. 地理学报, 2010,65(11):1401-1410. Yan J Z, Zhuo R G, Xie D T, et al. Land use characters of farmers of different livelihood strategies:cases in Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(11):1401-1410.
[5]	林杉,冯明磊,胡荣桂,等.三峡库区小流域农户氮循环和排放特征[J]. 环境科学, 2010,31(3):632-638. Lin S, Feng M L, Hu R G, et al. Characteristics of nitrogen cycling in farm systems in a small watershed of Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Environment Science, 2010,31(3):632-638.
[6]	Xu X, Tan Y, Yang G. Environmental impact assessments of the Three Gorges Project in China:Issues and interventions[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2013,124:115-125.
[7]	王桂良.中国三大粮食作物农田活性氮损失与氮肥利用率的定量分析[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2014. Wang G L. Quantitative analysis of reactive nitrogen losses and nitrogen use efficiency of three major grain crops in China[D]. Beijing:China Agricultural University, 2014.
[8]	陈成龙,高明,倪九派,等.三峡库区小流域稻田空间格局对氮磷流失影响[J]. 环境科学, 2017,38(5):1889-1897. Chen C L, Gao M, Ni J P, et al. Influence of spatial pattern of paddy field on the losses of nitrogen and phosphorus in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Environment Science, 2017,38(5):1889-1897.
[9]	武良,张卫峰,陈新平,等.中国农田氮肥投入和生产效率[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016,(4):76-83. Wu L, Zhang W F, Chen X P, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer input and nitrogen use efficiency in Chinese farmland[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2016,(4):76-83.
[10]	王小焕,邵景安,王金亮,等.三峡库区长江干流入出库水质评价及其变化趋势[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017,37(2):554-565. Wang X H, Shao J A, Wang J L, et al. Water quality assessment and its changing trends in the reservoir inflow and outflow along the Yangtze River mainstream in the Three Gorge Reservoir Area[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2017,37(2):554-565.
[11]	宿敏敏,况福虹,吕阳,等.不同轮作体系不同施氮量甲烷排放比较研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(4):913-920. Su M M, Kuang F H, Lu Y, et al. Impact of N fertilization on CH4 emission from paddy field under different rotation systems[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016,22(4):913-920.
[12]	张啸林.不同稻田轮作体系下温室气体排放及温室气体强度研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2013. Zhang X L. Greenhouse gases emissions and greenhouse gas intensity from different rice-based cropping systems[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013.
[13]	Sainju U M, Ghimire R, Mishra U, et al. Reducing nitrous oxide emissions and optimizing nitrogen-use efficiency in dryland crop rotations with different nitrogen rates[J]. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2020,116(3):381-395.
[14]	Huang T, Yang H, Huang C, et al. Effect of fertilizer N rates and straw management on yield-scaled nitrous oxide emissions in a maize-wheat double cropping system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017,204:1-11.
[15]	Xiao G M, Zhao Z C, Liang L, et al. Improving nitrogen and water use efficiency in a wheat-maize rotation system in the North China Plain using optimized farming practices[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019,212:172-180.
[16]	张卫红,李玉娥,秦晓波,等.应用生命周期法评价我国测土配方施肥项目减排效果[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015,34(7):1422-1428. Zhang W H, Li Y E, Qin X B, et al. Evaluation of greenhouse gas emission reduction by balanced fertilization in china using life cycle assessment[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2015,34(7):1422-1428.
[17]	Akiyama H, Yan X, Yagi K. Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils:meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010,16(6):1837-1846.
[18]	Pan B, Lam S K, Mosier A, et al. Ammonia volatilization from synthetic fertilizers and its mitigation strategies:A global synthesis[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016,232:283-289.
[19]	Recio J, Vallejo A, Le-Noë J, et al. The effect of nitrification inhibitors on NH3 and N2O emissions in highly N fertilized irrigated Mediterranean cropping systems[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018,636:427-436.
[20]	Abalos D, Jeffery S, Sanz-Cobena A, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2014,189:136-144.
[21]	王孝忠.我国蔬菜生产的环境代价、减排潜力与调控途径[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2018. Wang X Z. Environmental impacts, mitigation potentials and management approaches in Chinese vegetable production system-pepper as a case[D]. Beijing:China Agricultural University, 2018.
[22]	Cui Z L, Zhang H Y, Chen X P, et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers[J]. Nature, 2018,555(7696):363-366.
[23]	IPCC. Climate Change 2013:The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[R]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[24]	Huijbregts M A J, Thissen U, Guinée J B. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I:calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effectsmodel USES-LCA[J]. Chemosphere, 2000,41:541-573.
[25]	Deng N S, Wang X B, et al. Life Cycle Assessment[M]. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, 2003:134-149.
[26]	王林学,杨义,潘建华,等.重庆市渝北区主要粮食作物生产成本及效益分析[J]. 南方农业, 2017,11(10):62-64. Wang L X, Yang Y, Pan J H, et al. Production cost and benefit analysis of main grain crops in Chongqing Yubei District[J]. South China Agriculture, 2017,11(10):62-64.
[27]	武良.基于总量控制的中国农业氮肥需求及温室气体减排潜力研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2014.
[28]	Qin X, Feng F, Li Y, et al. Maize yield improvements in China:Past trends and future directions[J]. Plant Breeding, 2016,135(2):166-176.
[29]	Yin X, Huang M, Zou Y. Changes in Rice Yield Stability in Southern China from 1949 to 2015[J]. Agricultural & Environmental Letters, 2018,3(1).
[30]	梁龙,陈源泉,高旺盛,等.华北平原冬小麦-夏玉米种植系统生命周期环境影响评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009,28(8):1773-1776. Liang L, Chen Y Q, Gao W S, et al. Life cycle environmental impact assessment in winter wheat-summer maize system in North China Plain[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009,28(8):1773-1776.
[31]	王明新,夏训峰,刘建国,等.太湖地区高产水稻生命周期评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009,28(2):420-424. Wang M X, Xia X F, Liu J G, et al. Life cycle assessment of high-yielding rice in Taihu Region[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009,28(2):420-424.
[32]	詹凤.钾对榨菜产量和品质的影响[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2007. Zhan F. Effect of potassium nutrition on yield and quality of tumorous stem mustard[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University, 2007.
[33]	陈尚洪,陈红琳,郑盛华,等.西南地区玉米养分管理现状分析与评价[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019,(1):159-165. Chen S H, Chen H L, Zheng S H, et al. Current status and evaluation of nutrient management for maize in southwest China[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019,(1):159-165.
[34]	梁涛.基于土壤基础地力的施肥推荐研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2017. Liang T. Study on fertilization recommendations of crop base on soil inherent productivity-a case study of rice and maize in Chongqing[D]. Beijing:Chongqing:Southwest University, 2017.
[35]	张远蓉,王帅.水稻-榨菜轮作体系中施肥研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,33(2):69-73. Zhang Y R, Wang S. Study on fertilization status of rice-tumorous stem mustard rotation system[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2008,33(2):69-73.
[36]	温明霞,聂振朋,石孝均.榨菜叶还田对水稻产量的影响研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2007,22(13):43-45,95. Wen M X, Nie Z P, Shi X J. Effect of tuber mustard leaves returning to field on rice yield[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 22(13):43-45,95.
[37]	温明霞.榨菜叶在土壤中的分解动态及其对水稻营养效应研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2005. Wen M X. Study on decomposing dynamic of tumorous stem mustard leaves in soil and its nutrient effect[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University, 2005.
[38]	Qiao C, Liu L, Hu S, et al. How inhibiting nitrification affects nitrogen cycle and reduces environmental impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen input[J]. Global Change Biology, 2015,21(3):1249-1257.
[39]	周玉玲,侯朋福,李刚华,等.两种土壤增效剂对稻田氨挥发排放的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019,40(8):3746-3752. Zhou Y L, Hou P F, Li G H, et al. Effect of two soil synergists on ammonia volatilization in paddy fields[J]. Environment Science, 2019,40(8):3746-3752.
[40]	曹志洪,林先贵,杨林章,等.论"稻田圈"在保护城乡生态环境中的功能Ⅰ[J]. 稻田土壤磷素径流迁移流失的特征.土壤学报, 2005,42(5):799-804. Cao Z H, Lin X G, Yang L Z, et al. Ecological function of "paddy field ring" to urban and rural environment I[J]. characteristics of soil p losses from paddy fields to waterbodies with runoff. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005,42(5):799-804.
[41]	罗柏林,尚二凤,林晓,等.三峡库区不同稻田分布格局下农业小流域径流磷排放特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017,36(2):338-344. Luo B L, Shang E F, Lin X, et al. Characterization of runoff phosphorus export from small agricultural catchments with different spatial distribution patterns of rice paddies in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2017, 36(2):338-344.
[42]	陈成龙,高明,倪九派,等.三峡库区小流域不同土地利用类型对氮素流失影响[J]. 环境科学, 2016,37(5):1707-1716. Chen C L, Gao M, Ni J P, Xie D T, et al. Nitrogen losses under the action of different land use types of small catchment in Three Gorges Region. Environment Science, 2016,37(5):1707-1716.