Refined source apportionment of coal-combustion source based on CALPUFF-CMB models
WANG Lu, BI Xiao-hui, LIU Bao-shuang, GAO Ji-xin, LI Ting-kun, ZHANG Yu-fen, TIAN Ying-ze, FENG Yin-chang
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
In order to accurately reflect the influence of coal combustion emissions on atmospheric environment, the CALPUFF model was used to simulate the emission and transportation processes of PM10 emitted from different coal-combustion sources and to obtain the influencing weight-coefficient of every fine-sorted coal combustion source to ambient PM10 Then, the weight-coefficients were applied to construct a more representative coal combustion source profile. Finally, source apportionment of PM10 during the heating season in Urumqi was conducted by chemical mass balance (CMB) model by combining the chemical compositions in ambient PM10 and two sets of PM10 source profiles (i.e., source profiles which were constructed by traditional method and by environmental implication considered method). The results indicated that:the weight-coefficients of coal-fired power plant, industrials and domestic heating were 0.02, 0.59 and 0.39, respectively. The results of source apportionment based on traditional source profiles were as follows:coal combustion dust (27.2%), fugitive dust (19.1%), secondary sulfate (15.7%), residential coal combustion (9.9%), secondary nitrate (9.5%), vehicle exhaust dust (7.6%), steel dust (1.2%) and cement dust (0.2%). While based on environmental implication considered source profiles, that results ranked in secondary sulfate (20.1%), fugitive dust (20%), coal combustion dust (18.9%), residential coal combustion (11.5%), secondary nitrate (10.5%), vehicle exhaust dust (9%), steel dust (1.7%) and cement dust (1.4%). In terms of influencing weight-coefficients of fined-sorted coal combustion sources to ambient PM10, the result of source apportionment of coal-combustion sources was further fractionized, and the result suggested that the contribution of residential coal combustion was up to 11.5%, the contribution of coal-fired power plant was up to 0.4%, the contribution of industrial heating was up to 7.4% and the contribution of industrials was up to 11.1%.
Yang F, Tan J, Zhao Q, et al. Characteristics of PM2.5 speciation in representative megacities and across China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011,11(11):5207-5219.
[2]
Che H Z, Zhang X Y, Li Y, et al. Haze trends over the capital cities of 31provinces in China, 1981~2005[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2009,97(3/4):235-242.
Zhang X Y, Wang L, Wang W, et al. Long-term trend and spatiotemporal variations of haze over China by satellite observations from 1979 to 2013[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2015,119:362-373.
[7]
Querol X, Alastuey A, Rodriguez S, et al. PM10 and PM2.5 source apportionment in the Barcelona Metropolitan area, Catalonia, Spain[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2001,35(36):6407-6419.
[8]
Robinson A L, Subramanian R, Donahue N M, et al. Source apportionment of molecular markers and organic aerosol——1. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and methodology for data visualization[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006,40(24):7803-7810.
[9]
Xavier Q, Andres A, Jesus R, et al. Source apportionment analysis of atmospheric particulates in an industrialised urban site in southwestern Spain[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2002,36(19):3113-3125.
Zheng M, Salmon L G, Schauer J J, et al. Seasonal trends in PM2.5 source contributions in Beijing, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005,39(22):3967-3976.
[13]
Shi G L, Tian Y Z, Zhang Y F, et al. Estimation of the concentrations of primary and secondary organic carbon in ambient particulate matter:Application of the CMB-Iteration method[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011,45(32):5692-5698.
[14]
Marmur A, Mulholland J, Russell A. Optimized variable source-profile approach for source apportionment[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007,41(3):493-505.
[15]
Chow J C, Watson J G, Hampden K, et al. Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study[J]. Chemosphere, 2004,54(2):185-208.
[16]
Watson J G, Chow J C, Houck J E. PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995.[J]. Chemosphere, 2001,43(8):1141-1151.
[17]
Ho K F, Lee S C, Chow J C, et al. Characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 source profiles for fugitive dust in Hong Kong[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003,37(8):1023-1032.
[18]
Watson J G, Chow J C. Source characterization of major emission sources in the imperial and Mexicali Valleys along the US/Mexico border[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2001,276(1-3):33-47.
[19]
Maenhaut W, Fernandez-Jimenez M, Rajta I, et al. Two-year study of atmospheric aerosols in Alta Floresta, Brazil:Multielemental composition, sources and source apportionment[J]. Journal of Aerosolence, 2001,32(4):243-248.
[20]
House J I, Prentice I C, Ramankutty N, et al. Reconciling apparent inconsistencies in estimates of terrestrial CO2, sources and sinks[J]. Tellus, 2003,55(2):345-363.
Fung Y S, Wong L W Y. Apportionment of air pollution sources by receptor models in Hong Kong[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1995, 29(16):2041-2048.
[23]
Pant P, Baker S J, Shukla A, et al. The PM10fraction of road dust in the UK and India:Characterization, source profiles and oxidative potential[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015,530-531:445.
[24]
Marmur A, Mulholland J A, Russell A G. Optimized variable source-profile approach for source apportionment[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007,41(3):493-505.
Zhao P S, Feng Y C, Zhu T, et al. Characterizations of resuspended dust in six cities of North China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(30):5807-5814.
[32]
Bi X H, Feng Y C, Wu J H, et al. Source apportionment of PM10 in six cities of northern China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007,41(5):903-912.
Cao J J, Lee S C, Ho K F, et al. Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosol in Pearl River Delta Region, China during 2001 winter period[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003,37(11):1451-1460.
[35]
Lee S, Liu W, Wang Y, et al. Source apportionment of PM2.5:Comparing PMF and CMB results for four ambient monitoring sites in the southeastern United States[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(18):4126-4137.
Levy J I, Spengler J D, Hlinka D, et al. Using CALPUFF to evaluate the impacts of power plant emissions in Illinois:model sensitivity and implications[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2002,36(6):1063-1075.
[39]
Zhou Y, Levy J I, Hammitt J K, et al. Estimating population exposure to power plant emissions using CALPUFF:a case study in Beijing, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003,37(6):815-826.
[40]
Zou X D. Application of CALPUFF in air pollution simulation in Shenyang, Liaoning province[J]. Journal of Meteorology & Environment, 2008.