厌氧水环境中噬菌体MS2的存活和团聚特性及理化因素的影响

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1549 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为探究病毒在厌氧水环境中的存活特性,以噬菌体MS2为模式病毒,采用双层平板法进行噬菌体MS2的定量检测,研究温度、pH值、悬浮颗粒物、乙酸等理化条件对噬菌体MS2的影响,分析其衰减动力学特征,并通过测定Zeta电位和噬菌斑直径考察噬菌体颗粒在不同条件下的聚集状况.结果表明,在厌氧水环境中,噬菌体MS2的衰减符合一阶指数衰减模型.在众多研究因素中,温度是影响噬菌体MS2存活的最主要因素.噬菌体MS2在4,17,25和35℃时的T₉₀分别为20.36,6.14,5.15和0.46d.35℃条件下12h后噬菌体失活率高达2.44lg,而4℃条件下7d后噬菌体失活率仅有0.78lg.增加乙酸浓度能明显提高噬菌体MS2的衰减速率.低pH值和悬浮颗粒物条件会促进噬菌体的团聚,使噬菌体颗粒Zeta电位降低,水力学直径增大,但悬浮颗粒物浓度过高会影响颗粒间的静电作用.噬菌体的团聚也增加了噬菌斑的直径,pH=6和20mg/L的悬浮颗粒物条件下,直径1.0mm以上的大噬菌斑数量占比分别达到了45.61%和57.74%.明确厌氧水环境中各种理化因素对噬菌体MS2的影响,可为水环境病毒控制提供科学依据.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张崇淼
	赵倩
	王真

关键词 ：厌氧水环境, 噬菌体MS2, 理化因素, 存活, 团聚

Abstract：Bacteriophage MS2 was chosen as the model virus to reveal the survival characteristics of virus in anaerobic water environment. The effect of physicochemical conditions, including temperature, pH, suspended particles, and acetic acid on bacteriophage MS2 were studied by double-layer plate method. The decay kinetics of bacteriophage MS2 were analyzed, and the aggregation of phage particles under different conditions was investigated by measuring Zeta potential and plaque diameter. The results showed that the decay of bacteriophage MS2 in anaerobic water environment followed the first-order exponential decay model. Among the above-mentioned factors, temperature was the most important factor affecting the survival of bacteriophage MS2. At 4℃, 17℃, 25℃ and 35℃, the T₉₀ values of bacteriophage MS2 were 20.36d, 6.14d, 5.15d and 0.46d, respectively. The inactivation rate of bacteriophage MS2 was as high as 2.44lg after 12h at 35℃, while the inactivation rate was only 0.78lg after 7days at 4℃. Increasing the concentration of acetic acid significantly enhanced the inactivation rate of bacteriophage MS2. Low pH value and suspended particles promoted the aggregation of bacteriophage MS2, which caused Zeta potential decrease and the hydrodynamic diameter of phage particles increase, but excessively high concentrations of suspended particles affected the electrostatic interaction between particles. The aggregation of bacteriophage MS2 also increased the diameter of plaques. Under the condition of pH 6 and suspended particles at 20mg/L, the proportion of large plaques with diameter more than 1.0mm reached 45.61% and 57.74%, respectively. Clarification of the impact of various physicochemical factors on bacteriophage MS2 in anaerobic water environment can provide scientific basis for virus control in water environment.

Key words： anaerobic water environment bacteriophage MS2 physicochemical factors survival aggregation

收稿日期: 2021-12-09

PACS:

X172

基金资助:国家重点研发计划(2017YFE0127300);陕西省重点研发计划项目(2020ZDLNY06-07)

通讯作者: 张崇淼,教授,cmzhang@xauat.edu.cn E-mail: mzhang@xauat.edu.cn

作者简介: 张崇淼(1978-),男,河南郑州人,教授,研究方向为水环境微生物风险评价与控制,污水处理与资源化.发表论文80余篇.

引用本文:

张崇淼, 赵倩, 王真. 厌氧水环境中噬菌体MS2的存活和团聚特性及理化因素的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(7): 3434-3442. ZHANG Chong-miao, ZHAO Qian, WANG Zhen. Survival and aggregation characteristics of bacteriophage MS2 in anaerobic water environment and influence of physicochemical factors. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2022, 42(7): 3434-3442.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V42/I7/3434

[1]	郑祥,张巍,石磊,等.新型冠状病毒在水环境中潜在传播途径与风险控制关键节点[J].环境保护, 2020,48(Z2):87-89. Zheng X, Zhang W, Shi L, et al. Potential route of transmission of SARS-CoV-2in the water environment and key notes of risk control[J]. Environmental Protection, 2020,48(Z2):87-89.
[2]	Pang X L, Qiu Y Y, Gao T J, et al. Prevalence, levels and seasonal variations of human enteric viruses in six major rivers in Alberta, Canada[J]. Water Research, 2019,153:349-356.
[3]	Jahne M A, Brinkman N E, Keely S P, et al. Droplet digital PCR quantification of norovirus and adenovirus in decentralized wastewater and graywater collections:Implications for onsite reuse[J]. Water Research, 2020,169:115213.
[4]	Bivins A, North D, Ahmad A, et al. Wastewater-based epidemiology:Global collaborative to maximize contributions in the fight against COVID-19[J]. Environmental Science&Technology, 2020,54(13):7754-7757.
[5]	Aw T G, Howe A, Rose J B. Metagenomic approaches for direct and cell culture evaluation of the virological quality of wastewater[J]. Journal of Virological Methods, 2014,210:15-21.
[6]	Sidhu J P S, Toze S, Hodgers L, et al. Pathogen decay during managed aquifer recharge at four sites with different geochemical characteristics and recharge water sources[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2015,44(5):1402-1412.
[7]	Ibrahim E M E, El-Liethy M A, Abia A L K, et al. Survival of E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, HAdV2 and MNV-1in river water under dark conditions and varying storage temperatures[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,648:1297-1304.
[8]	王海丽,杨季芳,屠霄霞,等.象山港海洋病毒时空分布特征及其环境影响因素[J].中国环境科学, 2011,31(5):834-844. Wang H L, Yang J F, Tu X X, et al. Spatiotemporal distribution of marine virus with related to environmental factors in the Xiangshan Bay. China Environmental Science, 2011,31(5):834-844.
[9]	周进宏,王晓昌,徐丽梅.小型景观水体中病原微生物的分布特性[J].环境工程学报, 2015,9(12):5689-5696. Zhou J H, Wang X C, Xu L M. Distribution of pathogenic microorganisms in midget landscape water by real-time PCR methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015,9(12):5689-5696.
[10]	王珺瑜,赵晓丽,梁为纲,等.环境因素对病毒在水体中生存与传播的影响[J].环境科学研究, 2020,33(7):1596-1603. Wang J Y, Zhao X L, Liang W G, et al. Influences of environment factors on survival and transmission of viruses in water[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020,33(7):1596-1603.
[11]	Eregno F E, Tryland I, Myrmel M, et al. Decay rate of virus and faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in seawater and the concentration of FIBs in different wastewater systems[J]. Microbial Risk Analysis, 2018, 8:14-21.
[12]	ISO 10705-1-1995. Water Quality-Detection and Enumeration of Bacteriophages-Part 1:Enumeration of F-Specific RNA Bacteriophages[S]. 1995.
[13]	EPA Method 1602. Male-specific (F+) and Somatic Coliphage in Water by Single Agar Layer (SAL) Procedure[S]. 2001.
[14]	Chick H. An Investigation of the Laws of Disinfection[J]. The Journal of hygiene, 1908,8(1):92-158.
[15]	Peleg M.A model of microbial survival after exposure to pulsed electric fields[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1995,67(1):93-99.
[16]	John D E, Rose J B. Review of factors affecting microbial survival in groundwater[J]. Environmental Science&Technology, 2005,39(19):7345-7356.
[17]	何强,吴庆庆,马红芳,等.藻细胞和高岭土的存在对病毒MS2存活的影响[J].环境科学, 2014,35(8):3192-3197. He Q, Wu Q Q, Ma H F, et al. Effects of algae and kaolinite particles on the survival of bacteriophage MS2[J]. Environmental Science, 2014,35(8):3192-3197.
[18]	Akbas M Y, Olmez H. Inactivation of Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes on iceberg lettuce by dip wash treatments with organic acids[J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2007,44(6):619-624.
[19]	Ricke S C. Perspectives on the use of organic acids and short chain fatty acids as antimicrobials[J]. Poultry Science, 2003,82(4):632-639.
[20]	Bae Y M, Lee S Y. Effect of salt addition on acid resistance response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 against acetic acid[J]. Food Microbiology, 2016,65:74-82.
[21]	Gordon C, Toze S. Influence of groundwater characteristics on the survival of enteric viruses[J]. Journal of applied microbiology, 2003, 95(3):536-544.
[22]	刘彩霞,席晓晶,彭党聪,等.厌氧序批式反应器内挥发性脂肪酸积累特性研究[J].环境工程学报, 2009,3(12):2241-2244. Liu C X, Xi X J, Peng D C, et al. Research on accumulation characteristics of volatile fatty acid in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 3(12):2241-2244.
[23]	张建丰.活性污泥法工艺控制(第3版)[M].北京:中国电力出版社, 2021:50-52. Zhang J F. Activated sludge process control (3rd edition)[M]. Beijing:China electric power press, 2021:50-52.
[24]	Xagoraraki I, Yin Z Q, Svambayev Z. Fate of viruses in water systems[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014,140(7):doi:10.1061/(ASCE) EE.1943-7870.0000827.
[25]	Fongaro G, Kunz A, Magri M E, et al. Settling and survival profile of enteric pathogens in the swine effluent for water reuse purpose[J]. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2016,219(8):883-889.
[26]	Dika C, Duval J F L, Francius G, et al. Isoelectric point is an inadequate descriptor of MS2, Phi X 174and PRD1phages adhesion on abiotic surfaces[J]. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2015, 446:327-334.
[27]	张文静,周晶晶,刘丹,等.胶体在地下水中的环境行为特征及其研究方法探讨[J].水科学进展, 2016,27(4):629-638. Zhang W J, Zhou J J, Liu D, et al. A review:research methods that describe the environmental behavior of colloids in groundwater[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2016,27(4):629-638.
[28]	闵凡飞,赵晴,李宏亮,等.煤泥水中高岭土颗粒表面荷电特性研究[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2013,42(2):284-290. Min F F, Zhao Q, Li H L, et al. Study of electrokinetic properties of kaolinite in coal slime[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology, 2013,42(2):284-290.
[29]	Xing Y, Ellis A, Magnuson M, et al. Adsorption of bacteriophage MS2 to colloids:Kinetics and particle interactions[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2020,585:124099.
[30]	Langlet J G, Aboriaud F G, Antzer C. Effects of pH on plaque forming unit counts and aggregation of MS2 bacteriophage[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2007,103(5):1632-1638.
[31]	Sabara M I, Larence J E. Plaque assay for avian metapneumovirus using a Japanese quail fibrosarcoma cell line (QT-35)[J]. Journal of Virological Methods, 2003,107(1):9-14.
[32]	Cormier J, Janes M. A double layer plaque assay using spread plate technique for enumeration of bacteriophage MS2[J]. Journal of Virological Methods, 2014, 196:86-92.