讨论了2000年02月~2019年08月不同分辨率、算法中等分辨率成像光谱仪（MODIS）气溶胶光学厚度（AOD）产品在不同季节、区域、下垫面条件下中国区域的精度和适用性，在像元尺度上对比了重采样降低分辨率后的多角度大气校正（MAIAC）AOD数据与其他产品的精度.研究表明：在同等验证条件下，相较于暗目标算法（DT）、深蓝算法（DB）和暗目标与深蓝结合算法（DTB），1km MAIAC AOD产品在中国地区与AERONET站点AOD观测数据整体一致性最高，R2达到0.891，均方根误差（RMSE）仅为0.126，超过75%的验证样本落在期望误差线（EE）范围内；同时，该产品受季节、区域和下垫面变化影响也最小，其中秋季R2达到0.917，RMSE为0.111，样本落在EE内的比例达到80.11%.3km DT算法AOD产品在植被覆盖率较大的森林和农田区域优于1km MAIAC AOD产品，在植被覆盖率较小的草地和城市区域则差于1km MAIAC AOD产品，且该产品在不同季节均存在AOD高估问题，其中，夏季高估程度最高（平均相对误差（RMB）=1.622，AOD值高估62.2%）.DB在长三角和珠三角地区存在AOD被低估的现象.DTB算法兼顾了DT算法和DB算法的优缺点，DTB算法AOD产品的相关性一般高于DB算法AOD产品，样本被高估程度一般低于DT算法AOD产品.通过重采样方法降低1km MAIAC AOD产品分辨率后，相同尺度下的MAIAC AOD数据精度优于DT算法、DB算法和DTB算法AOD产品，因此，MAIAC算法更适用于小尺度城市群集中区域的大气环境监测.
Abstract
A new multi-angle atmospheric correction (MAIAC) algorithm was applied for the Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) to provide global aerosol optical thickness (AOD) product with 1km resolution. The dark target (DT), the dark blue (DB) and the combined DT and DB (DTB) algorithms have also been optimized and updated. In this paper, the accuracy and applicability of 5MODIS AOD products with different resolutions over China were verified and analyzed in terms of season, region and landcover type. Moreover, the resampled MAIAC AOD data was compared with other AOD products on the pixel scales. Our results showed that compared with DT, DB and DTB AOD products, 1km MAIAC AOD product had a best agreement with the ground-based AERONET measurements with overall R2 of 0.891, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.126 and=Expected Error (EE) larger than 75%, and its accuracy was least impacted by season, region and landcover type. Especially, the R2 of 1km MAIAC AOD reached to 0.917 and the RMSE was only 0.111, and there was 80.11% of 1 km MAIAC AOD falling in the expected error envelops. The reliability of 3km DT AOD was higher than that of 1km MAIAC AOD over the regions larger fraction of vegetation cover (e.g. forest and cropland), while it was lower than that of 1km MAIAC AOD for grassland and urban regions with smaller fraction of vegetation cover. 3km DT AOD was always overestimated, especially, the most overestimation of 3km DT AOD by 62.2% (RMB=1.622) was in the summer. Although the DB algorithm was more applicable for the regions with bright surface (e.g. urban regions), the DB AOD product showed a significant underestimation over Yangtze River Delta (YRD) and Pearl River Delta (PRD) regions. The DTB AOD product combined the advantages of DT and DB AOD products. The correlation between the DTB AOD and the AERONET was always higher than that between the DB AOD and the AERONET AOD, and the overestimation of DTB AOD retrievals was lower than that of DT ones. With the same resolutions, the accuracy of the MAIAC AOD was better than DT, DB and DTB AOD products. Therefore, the MAIAC algorithm was more suitable to the air monitoring of urban agglomerations.
关键词
多角度大气校正 /
气溶胶光学厚度 /
全球气溶胶自动观测网 /
中等分辨率成像光谱仪 /
中国
Key words
aerosol optical thickness /
aerosol robotic network /
China /
moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer /
multi-angle implementation of atmospheric correction
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 李婷苑,谭浩波,王春林,等.卫星遥感AOD反演地面细颗粒物浓度方法与效果[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(1):13-23. Li T Y, Tan H B, Wang C L, et al. The method and the correspongding effect of ground fine partical concentration retrieved by satellite remote sensing AOD[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(1):13-23.
[2] 丁莹,冯徽徽,邹滨,等.长株潭城市群气溶胶时空分布与传输规律[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(5):1906-1914. Ding Y, Feng H H, Zou B, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution and transport characteristic of aerosol in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(5):1906-1914.
[3] 唐志伟,许潇锋,杨晓玥,等.基于卫星资料的华东地区气溶胶三维分布特征研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(9):3624-3634. Tang Z W, Xu X F, Yang X Y, et al. Characteristics of three-dimensional aerosol distribution in Eastern China based on satellite data[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(9):3624-3634.
[4] 贺欣,周茹,姚媛,等.基于AERONET的中国地区典型站点气溶胶类型变化特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(2):485-496. He X, Zhou R, Yao Y, et al. The spatiotemporal variations of aerosol types in representative sites of China basing on the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET)[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020, 40(2):485-496.
[5] Che H, Yang L, Liu C, et al. Long-term validation of MODIS C6and C6. 1Dark Target aerosol products over China using CARSNET and AERONET[J]. Chemosphere, 2019,236:124268.
[6] Zhang Z, Wu W, Fan M, et al. Evaluation of MAIAC aerosol retrievals over China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019,202:8-16.
[7] Wei J, Li Z, Peng Y, et al. MODIS Collection 6.1aerosol optical depth products over land and ocean:validation and comparison[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019,201:428-440.
[8] Tao M, Chen L, Wang Z, et al. Evaluation of MODIS Deep Blue aerosol algorithm in desert region of East Asia:ground validation and intercomparison[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 2017,122(19):10357-10368.
[9] Xie G, Wang M, Pan J, et al. Spatio-temporal variations and trends of MODIS C6. 1Dark Target and Deep Blue merged aerosol optical depth over China during 2000~2017[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019, 214:116846.
[10] Lyapustin A, Wang Y, Laszlo I, et al. Multiangle implementation of atmospheric correction (MAIAC):2. Aerosol algorithm[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 2011,116(D3).DOI:10.1029/2010jd014986.
[11] Lyapustin A, Wang Y, Korkin S, et al. MODIS Collection 6MAIAC algorithm[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2018,11(10):5741-5765.
[12] Holben B N, Eck T F, Slutsker I, et al. AERONET-A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998,66(1):1-16.
[13] Tao M, Wang J, Li R, et al. Performance of MODIS high-resolution MAIAC aerosol algorithm in China:Characterization and limitation[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019,DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019, 06.004.
[14] Zhang Z, Wu W, Fan M, et al. Validation of Himawari-8aerosol optical depth retrievals over China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019,199:32-44.
[15] Ångström A. On the atmospheric transmission of sun radiation and on dust in the air[J]. Geografiska Annaler, 1929,11(2):156-166.
[16] Eck T F, Holben B N, Reid J S, et al. Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 1999,104(D24):31333-31349.
[17] Gupta P, Remer L A, Levy R C, et al. Validation of MODIS 3km land aerosol optical depth from NASA's EOS Terra and Aqua missions[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2018,11(5):3145-3159.
[18] He Q, Zhang M, Huang B, et al. MODIS 3km and 10km aerosol optical depth for China:Evaluation and comparison[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2017,153:150-162.
[19] Anderson J C, Wang J, Zeng J, et al. Long-term statistical assessment of Aqua-MODIS aerosol optical depth over coastal regions:bias characteristics and uncertainty sources[J]. Tellus B:Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2013,65(1):20805.
[20] Liu N, Zou B, Feng H, et al. Evaluation and comparison of multiangle implementation of the atmospheric correction algorithm, Dark Target, and Deep Blue aerosol products over China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2019,19(12):8243-8268.
[21] Levy R C, Mattoo S, Munchak L A, et al. The Collection 6MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2013,6(11):2989.
[22] Remer L A, Mattoo S, Levy R C, et al. MODIS 3km aerosol product:algorithm and global perspective[Z]. 2013.
[23] 祁佳丽,李生寿,李淑敏.基于EOS/MODIS影像的青海省一次典型沙尘事件遥感监测研究[J]. 环境监控与预警, 2018,10(4):19-23. Qi J L, Li S S, Li S M. Remote sensing monitoring of a typical dust event in Qinghai Province Based on EOS/MODIS images[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning, 2018,10(4):19-23.
基金
国家重点研发计划（2017YFB0503901）；国家自然科学基金重点项目（41830109）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（41871254）
PDF(8620 KB)
京公网安备 11010802030352号 
