Abstract:In this paper, the authors reviewed the physics process of groundwater pollution and the inter-constraint relationship between the groundwater resource and human activities. Base on the theory of the European model and pressure-state-response model, an assessment index system was established which takes consideration of the source, pathway and target. The established index system used for the assessment of groundwater pollution at a groundwater sources. The distribution maps of groundwater risk was derived and the results showed that the area with the highest risk lies in the east of the site and the area with high risk area is the Q petrochemical factory and its surrounding area.
刘姝媛, 王红旗. 某地下水水源地污染风险评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(10): 3166-3174.
LIU Shu-yuan, WANG Hong-qi. Establishment of a groundwater pollution risk assessment index system and its application at a groundwater sources. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2016, 36(10): 3166-3174.
Panagopoulos G P, Antonakos A K, Lambrakis N J. Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS [J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2006,14:894-911.
[8]
Goldscheider N, Klute M, Sturm S, et al. The PI method- a GIS-based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers [J]. Environmental Geo, 2000,46(3):157-166.
[9]
Malik P. Svasta J. REKS-an alternative method of karst groundwater vnlnerability estimation [C]. Bratialava: proceedings of the 29th Congress of the IAH hydrogeology and Land Use Management, 1999:79-85.
[10]
Holting B, Haertle T, Hohberger K. H, et al. Konzept zur ermittlung der schutzfunktion der grundwasserüberdeckung [J]. Geologisches Jahrbuch, 1995,C63:5-24.
[11]
Doerfliger N, Zwahlen F. Practical guide, groundwater vulnerability mapping in karstic regions (EPIK) [R]. Bern: Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), 1998,56.
Zwahlen F. Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers, final report COST action 620 [R]. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, EUR20912. 2004,297.
[19]
Andreo B, Goldscheider N, Vadillo I, et al. Karst groundwater protection: First application of a Pan-European approach to vulnerability, hazard and risk mapping in the Sierra de Líbar (Southern Spain) [J]. Science of the Total Environment. 2006, 357(1–3):54-73.
[20]
Goldscheider N. The concept of groundwater vulnerability. Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers, final report COST Action 620 [R]. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, EUR20912, 2004:5-9.
[21]
Daly D, Hotzl H, De Ketelaere D. Risk definition. Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers, final report COST action 620 [R]. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, EUR20912, 2004:106-107.
Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process [M]. McGraw-Hill Inc. 1980:17–34.
[27]
David Niemeijer, Rudolf S de Groot.A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2008:14-25.
[28]
吴小欢.AHP理论中关于判断矩阵一致性问题研究 [D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2006.
[29]
Neshat A B. Pradhan, Dadras M. Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS [J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2014,86:74-86.