Effects of different substrate biochar on the performance and microecology of anaerobic biological treating food waste
TANG Lin-qin1, SU Cheng-yuan1,2, ZHAO Li-jian1, WANG Peng-fei1, WANG An-liu1, LI Fei-qian1, FAN Cui-ping1, HUANG Xin-yue1
1. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection, Ministry of Education, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China;
2. School of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
The effects of sewage sludge (SS), food waste (FW), corn cob (CC) and bagasse (BG) biochar on the anaerobic biological treatment of food waste were investigated. Meanwhile, the key enzyme activity, microbial community distribution and metabolic pathway of anaerobic sludge were analyzed. The average COD removal rate increased by 29.49%, 23.16%, 29.42%, and 40.32% after addition of the four kinds of biochar in the anaerobic reactor, respectively. The activity of acetokinase in the four anaerobic reactors was 0.40, 0.42, 0.96 and 0.98μmol/g, respectively. The high acetokinase activity of the anaerobic sludge in the CC and BG groups demonstrated that the addition of the CC and BG biochar promoted the hydrolysis and acidification of food waste. In addition, the ratio of protein/polysaccharide of extracellular polymeric substances in the anaerobic sludge was 0.415, 0.56, 1.89 and 2.8, respectively. It was demonstrated that adding CC and BG biochar improved the stability of anaerobic sludge. In the four anaerobic reactors, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were the dominant phylum, and the addition of BG biochar promoted the growth of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. As for the archaea, Methanobacterium and Methanothrix were the dominant species. Methanobacterium in the SS group had highest abundance (53.48%), while Methanothrix in the BG group had the highest abundance (42.72%). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) functional analysis showed that archaea and bacteria were mainly metabolized by carbohydrate and amino acids. In addition, the transport level of microbial membrane was improved in presence of BG and SS biochar.
唐琳钦, 宿程远, 赵力剑, 王鹏飞, 王安柳, 李飞倩, 樊翠萍, 黄欣悦. 不同基质生物炭对厌氧处理餐厨垃圾效能及微生态的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(11): 4831-4840.
TANG Lin-qin, SU Cheng-yuan, ZHAO Li-jian, WANG Peng-fei, WANG An-liu, LI Fei-qian, FAN Cui-ping, HUANG Xin-yue. Effects of different substrate biochar on the performance and microecology of anaerobic biological treating food waste. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2020, 40(11): 4831-4840.
Uçkun K E, Trzcinski A P, Ng W J, et al. Bioconversion of food waste to energy:A review[J]. Fuel, 2014,134:389-399.
[2]
Li Y Y, Jin Y Y, Borrion A, et al. Effects of organic composition on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017,244:213-224.
[3]
冯显露,刘新颖,孙德智,等.投加颗粒活性炭强化餐厨垃圾的厌氧处理[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(3):1018-1023. Feng X L, Liu X Y, Sun D Z, et al. Enhancing anaerobic methanogenic treatment of kitchen wastes by incorporating granular activated carbon[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(3):1018-1023.
[4]
Zhao L J, Su C Y, Chen S X, et al. Expanded granular sludge blanket reactor treatment of food waste at ambient temperature:Analysis of nitrogen compositions and microbial community structure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,294:122134.
[5]
王博,叶春,李法云,等.水生植物制生物炭对硝态氮的吸附规律研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(1):116-122. Wang B, Ye C, Li F Y, et al. Studies on adsorption of nitrate from modified hydrophyte biochars[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37(1):116-122.
[6]
Takaya C A, Fletcher L A, Singh S, et al. Phosphate and ammonium sorption capacity of biochar and hydrochar from different wastes[J]. Chemosphere, 2016,145:518-527.
[7]
郭克俭,何品晶,邵立明,等.应用生物炭改善填埋场渗滤液的厌氧消化性能[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(5):1801-1810. Guo K J, He J J, Shao L M, et al. Application of biochar to improve anaerobic digestion of landfill leachate[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(5):1801-1810.
[8]
Lü F, Liu Y, Shao L M, et al. Powdered biochar doubled microbial growth in anaerobic digestion of oil[J]. Applied Energy, 2019,247:605-614.
[9]
陈梅,王芳,张德俐,等.生物炭结构性质对氨氮的吸附特性影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019,40(12):5421-5429. Chen M, Wang F, Zhang D L, et al. The influence of biochar structure properties on the adsorption characteristics of ammonia nitrogen[J]. Environmental Science, 2019,40(12):5421-5429.
[10]
Dong B, Xia Z H, Sun J, et al. The inhibitory impacts of nano-graphene oxide on methane production from waste activated sludge in anaerobic digestion[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 646:1376-1384.
[11]
Liu H, Liu X L, Qiu J, et al. The effects of C/N ratio on the production of volatile fatty acids and the metabolic pathway of anaerobic fermentation of sewage sludge[J]. Huanjing Kexue Xuebao/Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2010,30:340-346.
[12]
Guo X L, Gu J, Gao H, et al. Effects of Cu on metabolisms and enzyme activities of microbial communities in the process of composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012,108:140-148.
[13]
Yang G J, Zhang N, Yang J N, et al. Interaction between perfluorooctanoic acid and aerobic granular sludge[J]. Water Research, 2020,169:115249.
[14]
Pan B J, Qiu H, Pan B C, et al. Highly efficient removal of heavy metals by polymer-supported nanosized hydrated Fe(Ⅲ) oxides:Behavior and XPS study[J]. Water Research, 2010,44:815-824.
[15]
Zhao L J, Su C Y, Liu W H, et al. Exposure to polyamide 66microplastic leads to effects performance and microbial community structure of aerobic granular sludge[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020,190:110070.
[16]
Oviedo M J, Quester K, Hirata G A, et al. Determination of conjugated protein on nanoparticles by an adaptation of the Coomassie blue dye method[J]. MethodsX, 2019,6:2134-2140.
[17]
Meng Y J, Wang M M, Guo B, et al. Characterization and C-, N-disinfection byproduct formation of dissolved organic matter in MBR and anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (AAO) processes[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017,315:243-250.
[18]
Su C Y, Zhao L J, Liao L M, et al. Application of biochar in a CIC reactor to relieve ammonia nitrogen stress and promote microbial community during food waste treatment[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,209:353-362.
[19]
王兴栋,张斌,余广炜,等.不同粒径污泥热解制备生物炭及其特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2016,67(11):4808-4816. Wang X D, Zhang B, Yu G W, et al. Biochar preparation and characteristic analysis of sludge with different particle sizes[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2016,67(11):4808-4816.
[20]
史月月,单锐,袁浩然.改性稻壳生物炭对水溶液中甲基橙的吸附效果与机制[j]. 环境科学, 2019,40(6):2783-2792. Shi Y Y, Shan R, Yuan H R. Adsorption effect and mechanism of modified rice husk biochar on methyl orange in aqueous solution[J]. Environmental Science, 2019,40(6):2783-2792.
[21]
Liu X M, Sheng G P, Luo H W, et al. Contribution of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) to the sludge aggregation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010,44:4355-4360.
[22]
Liang Y G, Xu L, Bao J, et al. Attapulgite enhances methane production from anaerobic digestion of pig slurry by changing enzyme activities and microbial community[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020,145:222-232.
[23]
Tao Z L, Wang D B, Yao F B, et al. Influence of low voltage electric field stimulation on hydrogen generation from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 704:135849.
[24]
Wang W G, Yan Y, Zhao Y H, et al. Characterization of stratified EPS and their role in the initial adhesion of anammox consortia[J]. Water Research, 2020,169:115223.
[25]
Jiang B, Zeng Q Z, Liu J X, et al. Enhanced treatment performance of phenol wastewater and membrane antifouling by biochar-assisted EMBR[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,3:123147.
[26]
Tejerizo G T, Kim Y S, Maus I, et al. Genome sequence of Methanobacterium congolense strain Buetzberg, a hydrogenotrophic, methanogenic archaeon, isolated from a mesophilic industrial-scale biogas plant utilizing bio-waste[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2017, 247:1-5.
[27]
Jetten M S M, Stams A J M, Zehnder A J B. Methanogenesis from acetate:a comparison of the acetate metabolism in Methanothrix soehngenii and Methanosarcina spp[J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 1992,88:181-197.
[28]
Zhao Z Q, Sun C, Li Y, et al. Upgrading current method of anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge for high-efficiency methanogenesis:Establishing direct interspecies electron transfer via ethanol-type fermentation[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020,148:523-533.
[29]
Huang W Y, She Z L, Gao M C, et al. Effect of anaerobic/aerobic duration on nitrogen removal and microbial community in a simultaneous partial nitrification and denitrification system under low salinity[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019,651:859-870.
[30]
Granada C E, Hasan C, Marder M, et al. Biogas from slaughterhouse wastewater anaerobic digestion is driven by the archaeal family Methanobacteriaceae and bacterial families Porphyromonadaceae and Tissierellaceae[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018,118:840-846.
[31]
Meng D L, Li J, Liu T B, et al. Effects of redox potential on soil cadmium solubility:Insight into microbial community[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019,75:224-232.
[32]
雷雨晴.直接种间电子传递强化垃圾焚烧渗沥液厌氧生物处理效能的研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2019. Lei Y Q. Study on enhancing the efficiency of anaerobic bio-treatment treating incineration leachate via direct tnters pecies electron transfer[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2019.
[33]
Yuan H Y, Ding L J, Zama E F, et al. Biochar modulates methanogenesis through electron syntrophy of microorganisms with ethanol as a substrate[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52:12198-12207.
[34]
Melia P M, Busquets R, Hooda P S, et al. Driving forces and barriers in the removal of phosphorus from water using crop residue, wood and sewage sludge derived biochars[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,675:623-631.
[35]
Yadav A K, Sahoo P K, Goswami H N, et al. Transcriptional fidelity of mitochondrial RNA polymerase rpotm from arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2019,431:4767-4783.
