Spatiotemporal variation of CUE and its correlation with climate change in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area
LUO Zhao-hui, ZHU Lu-ping, ZHANG Xiao-jun, FANG Qiao-li, YANG Xiao, ZHOU Li-xuan, YU Xi-jun, LIANG Ming-yi, LU Jun-qing
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ecological Simulation and Protection, South China Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Guangzhou 510535, China
Abstract：The variation and correlation with climate change of vegetation productivity (GPP and NPP) and CUE in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) were analyzed based on trend analysis and correlation analysis by using MOD17 dataset during 2000~2019. Our results indicated that: (1) the mean value of GPP, NPP and CUE were 1.80kg·C/m2, 0.89kg·C/m2 and 0.51, respectively. The spatial patterns of GPP and NPP displayed an increase trend from middle part of the GBA to the around, while CUE showed an inverse spatial pattern. (2) GPP and NPP showed an increase trend during the period of 2000~2019 with the change rate of 0.01kg·C/(m2·a) and 0.001kg·C/(m2·a), respectively, and the variation rate of GPP was higher than that of NPP. The increasing trends of GPP and NPP among vegetation types were also observed. However, CUE displayed a decrease trend at approximately -0.002a-1, and more than 68% of the whole area showed a decrease CUE in future, which indicated a gradually weakened capacity of vegetation carbon sequestration due to the possible reasons of different sensitive of photosynthesis and autotrophic respiration caused by cumulative net solar radiation. Additionally, the highest CUE was found for farmland, approximately (0.511±0.014), followed by forest and grassland, and the CUE were (0.500±0.019) and (0.501±0.020), respectively. Moreover, CUE for different vegetation types were all displayed a significant decreasing trend (P < 0.01) during study period. (3) GPP was positively correlated with temperature, cumulative precipitation and cumulative net solar radiation, and accounted approximately 94.52%, 53.36% and 90.58%, respectively. The relationship between NPP and climate factors was similar to that of GPP, and the proportion were 86.86%, 71.10% and 85.97%, respectively. However, positive relationships were found between CUE and temperature and cumulative precipitation, while negative relationship was found between CUE and cumulative net solar radiation. Similarly, GPP and NPP were all positive with climate factors for different vegetation types, and relationship between CUE and temperature as well as cumulative precipitation for different vegetation types were also positive. However, negative relationship was found between CUE and cumulative net solar radiation for three vegetation types.
郑飞鸽,易桂花,张廷斌,等.三江源植被碳利用率动态变化及其对气候响应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(1):401-413. Zheng F G, Yi G H, Zhang T B, et al. Study on spatio-temporal dynamics of vegetation carbon use efficiency and its response to climate factors in Three-River Headwaters Region[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(1):401-413.
[2]
底阳平,曾辉,张扬建,等.多尺度碳利用效率研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021,40(6):1849-1860. Di Y P, Zeng H, Zhang Y J, et al. esearch advances in carbon use efficiency at multiple scales[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(6):1849－1860.
[3]
袁旻舒,李明旭,程红岩,等.基于CMIP5模型结果的中国陆地生态系统未来碳利用效率变化趋势分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2017,34(4):452-461. Yuan M S, Li M X, Cheng H Y, et al. Future trends in carbon use efficiency for Chinese terrestrial ecosystem based on CMIP5 model results[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017,34(4):452-461.
[4]
Choudhury B J. Modeling radiation- and carbon-use efficiencies of maize, sorghum, and rice[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2001,106(4):317-330.
[5]
Delucia E H, Drake J E, Thomas R B, et al. Forest carbon use efficiency: is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production?[J]. Global Change Biology, 2007,13(6):1157-1167.
[6]
Zhang Y, Xu M, Chen H, et al. Global pattern of NPP to GPP ratio derived from MODIS data: effects of ecosystem type, geographical location and climate[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2009, 18(3):280-290.
[7]
Zhang Y J, Yu G R, Yang J, et al. Climate-driven global changes in carbon use efficiency[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23:144-155.
[8]
Gang C, Wang Z, Zhou W, et al. Assessing the spatiotemporal dynamic of global grassland water use efficiency in response to climate change from 2000 to 2013[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2015, 202(5):343-354.
[9]
刘洋洋,王倩,杨悦,等.2000~2013年中国植被碳利用效率(CUE)时空变化及其与气象因素的关系[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019,26(5): 278-286. Liu Y Y, Wang Q, Yang Y, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamic of vegetation carbon use efficiency and its relationship with climate factors in China during the period 2000~2013[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,26(5):278-286.
[10]
Manzoni S, Čapek P, Porada P, et al. Reviews and syntheses: Carbon use efficiency from organisms to ecosystems-definitions, theories, and empirical evidence[J]. Biogeosciences, 2018,15:5929-5949.
[11]
陈雅如.三峡库区森林生产力与碳储量对景观格局变化的响应[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2017. Chen Y R. The responses of forest productivity and carbon storage to landscape pattern change in Three Gorges Reservoir area[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2017.
[12]
Jiang C, Wu Z F, Cheng J, et al. Impacts of urbanization on net primary productivity in the Pearl River Delta, China[J]. International Journal of Plant Production, 2015,9(4):1735-6814.
[13]
Shi X, Elmore A, Li X, et al. Using spatial information technologies to select sites for biomass power plants: A case study in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2008,32(1):35-43.
[14]
Kendall M G. Rank correlation methods[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 1990,25(1):86-91.
[15]
Neeti N, Eastman J R. A contextual Mann-Kendall approach for the assessment of trend significance in image time series[J]. Transactions in GIS, 2011,15:599-611.
[16]
Heinsh F A, Zhao M, Running S W, et al. Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006,44(7):1908-1925.
[17]
Olson R J, Johnson K R, Zheng D L, et al. Global and regional ecosystem modeling: databases of model drivers and validation measurements[J]. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 2002,167(2):437-456.
[18]
Turner D P, Ritts W D, Zhao M, et al. Assessing interannual variation in MODIS-based estimates of gross primary production[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006,44(7):1899-1907.
[19]
吴艳艳.城市化过程广州土地覆盖变化对净初级生产力格局的影响[D]. 广州:中山大学, 2016. Wu Y Y. The effects of land cover change on patterns of net primary productivity in the process of urbanization of Guangzhou[D]. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University, 2016.
[20]
巩杰,曹二佳,李红瑛,等.2000~2013年甘肃白龙江流域植被NPP时空变化及其影响因素[J]. 兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 56(2):154-161. Gong J, Cao E J, Li H Y, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of vegetation NPP and its influence factors in Bailongjiang watershed in Gansu Province from 2000 to 2013[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University: Natural Sciences, 2020,56(2):154-161.
[21]
汪东川,曹泽军,张利辉,等.京津冀城市群NPP时空分布及其影响因素研究[J]. 环境生态学, 2020,2(5):1-10. Wang D C, Cao Z J, Zhang L H, et al. Study on the spatial－temporal distribution of NPP and its influencing factors in Beijing－Tianjin－Hebei urban agglomeration[J]. Environmental Ecology, 2020,2(5):1-10.
[22]
袁甲,沈非,聂兵,等.皖江城市带植被NPP时空变化及其气候响应[J]. 测绘科学, 2017,42(11):62-67. Yuan J, Shen F, Nie B, et al. Temporal-spatial patterns of vegetation net primary productivity and its response to climate factors in Wanjiang city belt based on CASA model[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2017,42(11):62-67.
[23]
王世豪,黄麟,徐新良,等.粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务时空演化及其权衡与协同特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020,40(23):8403-8416. Wang S H, Huang L, Xu X L, Xu S W. Spatial and temporal evolution of ecosystem services and its trade-offs and synergies in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(23):8403-8416.
[24]
杨加志,张红爱,严玉莲,等.基于森林资源连续清查的广东省人工林资源动态分析[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2019,35(2):95-99. Yang J Z, Zhang H A, Yan Y L, et al. Dynamic analysis of plantation resources in Guangdong province based on continuous inventory of forest resources[J]. Forestry and Environmental Science, 2019, 35(2):95-99.
[25]
Kwon Y, Larsen C P S. Effects of forest type and environmental factors on forest carbon use efficiency assessed using MODIS and FIA data across the eastern USA[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2013,34(23):8425-8448.
[26]
Waring R H, Landseberg J J, Williams M. Net primary production of forests: A constant fraction of gross primary production?[J]. Tree Physiology, 1998,18:129-113.
[27]
陈智.2000~2015年中国东北森林生产力和碳素利用率的时空变异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,3(5):1625-1632. Chen Z. Spatiotemporal variation of productivity and carbon use efficiency of forests in Northeast China from 2000 to 2015[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019,3(5):1625-1632.
[28]
Luo Z H, Yu S X. Spatiotemporal Variability of Land Surface Phenology in China from 2001~2014[J]. Remote Sensing, 2017,9:65.
[29]
Ryan M G, Hubbard R M, Pongracic S, et al. Foliage, fine-root, woody-tissue and stand respiration in Pinus radiate in relation to nitrogen status[J]. Tree Physiology, 1996,16:333-343.
[30]
Shi C, Sun G, Zhang H, et al. Effects of warming on chlorophyll degradation and carbohydrate accumulation of Alpine herbaceous species during plant senescence on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Plos one, 2014,9(9):e107874.
[31]
Liu Q, Fu Y S H, Zeng Z Z, et al. Temperature, precipitation, and insolation effects on autumn vegetation phenology in temperate China[J]. Global Change Biology, 2016,22(2):644-655.
[32]
Bonan G B. Ecological Climatology: Concepts and Applications[M]. the United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[33]
苗玉,高冠龙,李伟.黄土高原苹果树叶片气孔导度的环境响应与模拟[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021,44(3):525-533. Miao Y, Gao G L, Li W. Environmental response and modeling of stomatal conductance of apple trees on the Loess Plateau[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021,44(3):525-533.
[34]
张运林,睢晋玲.吴娴,等.粤港澳大湾区PM2.5时空分布特征及其与气象要素的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(6):2272-2281. Zhang Y L, Sui J L, Wu X, et al. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of PM2.5 and its relationship with meteorological factors in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(6):2272-2281.
[35]
李登秋,周艳莲,居为民,等.太阳辐射变化对亚热带人工常绿针叶林总初级生产力影响的模拟分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014,38(3): 219-230. Li D Q, Zhou Y L, Ju W M, et al. Modelling the effects of changes in solar radiation on gross primary production in subtropical evergreen needle-leaf plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(3):219-230.
[36]
Atkin O K, Evans J R, Ball M C, et al. Leaf respiration of snow gum in the light and dark. Interactions between temperature and irradiance[J]. Plant Physiol, 2000,122(3):915-923.
[37]
Maseyk K, Grünzweig J M, Rotenberg E, et al. Respiration acclimation contributes to high carbon-use efficiency in a seasonally dry pine forest[J]. Global Change Biology, 2008,14(7):1553-1567.
[38]
Metcalfe D B, Meir P, Arag O L E O C, et al. Shifts in plant respiration and carbon use efficiency at a large-scale drought experiment in the eastern Amazon[J]. New Phytologist, 2010,187(3):608-621.
[39]
吴建国.降雨量和温度变化对麻花艽叶片光合作用及相关生理参数的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2010,32(5):73-79. Wu J G. Effects of changing in precipitation and temperature on the photosynthesis and related physiological parameters of Straw-Yellow Gentian[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2010,32(5):73-79.
[40]
Collalti A, Trotta C, Keenan T, et al. Thinning can reduce losses in carbon use efficiency and carbon stocks in managed forests under warmer climate[J]. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2018,10(10):2427-2452.
[41]
Curtis P S, Vogel C S, Gough C M, et al. Respiratory carbon losses and the carbon-use efficiency of a northern hardwood forest, 1999~2003[J]. New Phytologist, 2005,167(2):437-456.
[42]
Liu D, Li Y, Wang T, et al. Contrasting responses of grassland water and carbon exchanges to climate change between Tibetan Plateau and Inner Mongolia[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 249(10):163-175.
[43]
Allison S D, Wallenstein M D, Bradford M A. Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2010,3(5):336-340.
