Analysis on environmental benefits of construction and demolition waste recycling: A case study in Chongqing
LIU Ting-ting1, ZHANG Jie1, HU Ming-ming2,3
1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Anhui Xinhua Univercity, Hefei 230088, China;
2. School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China;
3. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden 2333 CC, the Netherlands
Based on system dynamics through literature analysis, spot investigation and questionnaire results, the study of modeling and simulation of environmental benefit of Building Waste Resource recovery is carried to provide the favorable policy of lifting of environmental benefit to promote the sustainable development of building waste resource recovery. Through the scenario analysis of the environmental benefit modeling, it comes to the conclusion that the environmental benefit is in optimal state with 50yuan/t~60yuan/t of fine for illegal emission unit, about 30yuan/t of landfill charge, 15km~25km of distance of building waste to the center of resource recovery treatment and 25yuan/t of subsidy of resource recovery. At the same time, the government should improve the level of building waste related laws, cultivate the awareness of relevant personnel on-site recycling, and promote relevant research and development, in order to promote the environmental benefits of building waste resource recovery.
刘婷婷, 张劼, 胡鸣明. 建筑废弃物资源化环境效益分析:以重庆为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(10): 3853-3867.
LIU Ting-ting, ZHANG Jie, HU Ming-ming. Analysis on environmental benefits of construction and demolition waste recycling: A case study in Chongqing. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2018, 38(10): 3853-3867.
Peng C L, Scorpio D E, Kibert C J. Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 1997,15(1):49-58.
[9]
Ling Y Y, Leo K C. Reusing timber formwork:importance of workmen's efficiency and attitude[J]. Building and Environment, 2000,35(2):135-143.
[10]
Hao J L, Hills M J, Tam V W Y. The effectiveness of Hong Kong's construction waste disposal charging scheme[J]. Waste Management & Research, 2008,26(6):553-558.
[11]
Begum R, Siwar C, Pereira J J, et al. A benefit-cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimization:the case of Malaysia[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2006,48(1):86-98.
[12]
Duran X, Lenihan H, O'Regan B. A model for assessing the economic viability of construction and demolition waste recycling-the case of Ireland[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2006,46(3):302-20.
[13]
Calvo N, Varela-Candamio L, Novo-Corti I. A Dynamic Model for Construction and Demolition(C&D) Waste Management in Spain:Driving Policies Based on Economic Incentives and Tax Penalties[J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2014,6(1):416-435.
Zhao W, Leeftink R B, Rotter V S. Evaluation of the economic feasibility for the recycling of construction and demolition waste in China-The case of Chongqing[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2010,54(6):377-389.
[27]
Anghinolfi D, Paolucci M, Robba M, et al. A dynamic optimization model for solid waste recycling[J]. Waste Management, 2013,33(2):287-96.
Lu Weisheng, Yuan Hongping. Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2010,55:201-208.
