洁净环境样本低浓度微生物高效富集检测及应用

张琪; 陈雪; 曹家琪; 李丽丽; 张丽萍; 李凡双; 马雪征; 赵欣; 刘丽娟; 方志强; 胡孔新

PDF(2634 KB)

中国环境科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11) : 4893-4899.

环境微生物

洁净环境样本低浓度微生物高效富集检测及应用

张琪¹, 陈雪², 曹家琪², 李丽丽², 张丽萍², 李凡双², 马雪征², 赵欣², 刘丽娟², 方志强², 胡孔新²

作者信息 +

Study on the convenient and efficient enrichment effect of new modified magnetic beads on low level microorganisms in the environment

ZHANG Qi¹, CHEN Xue², CAO Jia-qi², LI Li-li², ZHANG Li-ping², LI Fan-shuang², MA Xue-zheng², ZHAO Xin², LIU Li-juan², FANG Zhi-qiang², HU Kong-xin²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为了研究对洁净环境样本的低浓度微生物监测方法，制备了低浓度的革兰氏阳性菌和阴性菌各3种，使用修饰后的新型磁珠对模拟样本中的微生物进行富集评价实验.革兰氏染色和菌落计数结果表明，磁珠对3种革兰氏阳性菌和3种阴性菌均具有显著富集浓缩作用，与大肠杆菌相比，磁珠对金黄色葡萄菌的富集浓缩比更高.使用磁珠富集液对自来水、桶装水和瓶装矿泉水中的微生物进行非特异性吸附后，比较上清和磁珠-微生物复合物的细菌16S rDNA基因拷贝数和菌落总数指标，结果表明磁珠对自来水和桶装水中的微生物均具有显著的吸附效果（P<0.01，P<0.001）.通过比较，抽滤法和磁珠法对自来水中的微生物富集效果有差异（P=0.002），2种方法对桶装水和矿泉水的富集效果无显著差异（P=0.362）.采集实际空气样本进行磁珠富集微生物的菌落计数及细菌16S rDNA基因拷贝数进行分析，磁珠-微生物复合物中的绝对基因拷贝数和菌落总数均显著高于磁分离后上清液中基因拷贝数和菌落计数（P=0.0001）.此方法对微生物具有一定的高效富集作用.

Abstract

In order to study the monitoring method of low-concentration microorganisms in clean environment, three kinds of low concentrated Gram-positive and negative bacteria, were prepared to evaluate the enriched and concentrated efficiency of microorganisms. The experiment showed the bacteria concentrated by the modified magnetic beads had a higher enrichment and concentration ratio compared with E. coli and S. aureus. After non-specific enrichment of microorganisms in tap water, drinking water and bottled water, there were significant difference among these three types of water for the 16S rDNA gene copy numbers (P<0.01), and the significant difference was also observed in the total number of colonies between the supernatant and the enriched microbial complex (P<0.001). Significant difference between filtering method and magnetic-bead enrichment (P=0.002) for tap water, but no significant differences for drinking and bottled water (P=0.362). The colony counting and 16S rDNA gene copy number of bacteria enriched by magnetic beads were analyzed. The absolute gene copy numbers and the total number of colonies in the magnetic-bead microbial complex were significantly higher than those in the supernatant after magnetic separation (P=0.0001). This method has some high efficiency enrichment effect on microorganisms.

导出引用

张琪, 陈雪, 曹家琪, 李丽丽, 张丽萍, 李凡双, 马雪征, 赵欣, 刘丽娟, 方志强, 胡孔新. 洁净环境样本低浓度微生物高效富集检测及应用[J]. 中国环境科学. 2020, 40(11): 4893-4899

ZHANG Qi, CHEN Xue, CAO Jia-qi, LI Li-li, ZHANG Li-ping, LI Fan-shuang, MA Xue-zheng, ZHAO Xin, LIU Li-juan, FANG Zhi-qiang, HU Kong-xin. Study on the convenient and efficient enrichment effect of new modified magnetic beads on low level microorganisms in the environment[J]. China Environmental Science. 2020, 40(11): 4893-4899

中图分类号： X172

参考文献

[1] Flemming Flemming H C. Biofouling in water systems-cases, causes and countermeasures[J]. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2002,59:629-640.doi:10.1007/s00253-002-1066-9.
[2] Amann R I, Ludwig W, Schleifer K H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation[J]. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 1995,59:143-169.
[3] Kalmbach S, Manz W, Szewzyk U. Isolation of new bacterial species from drinking water biofilms and proof of their in situ dominance with highly specific 16S rRNA probes[J]. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1997, 63:4164-4170.
[4] Andreae M O, Crutzen P J. Atmospheric aerosols:biogeochemical sources and role in atmospheric chemistry[J]. Science, 1997,276:1052LP-1058.doi:10.1126/science.276.5315.1052.
[5] Jones A M, Harrison R M. The effects of meteorological factors on atmospheric bioaerosol concentrations——a review[J]. Sci. Total Environ., 2004,326:151-180.doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.11.021.
[6] Jaenicke R. Abundance of cellular material and proteins in the atmosphere[J]. Science, 2005,308:73.doi:10.1126/science.1106335.
[7] 刘丽,王体健,蒋自强,等.东南沿海生物气溶胶的扩散模拟研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2012,32(11):2670-2683. Liu L, Wang T J, Jiang Z Q, et al. Numerical study on bioaerosol dispersion over southeast coast of China[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2012,32(11):2670-2683.
[8] 刘丽.东南沿海污染气象特征及生物气溶胶的扩散模拟研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2011. Liu L. Study on the pollution meteorological characteristics simulation of bioaerosols dispersion over southeast coastal area of China[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University, 2011.
[9] 张宝莹,刘凡,白雪涛.病原微生物气溶胶对人群健康风险评价研究进展[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2015,5(3):287-292. Zhang B Y, Liu F, Bai X T. Progress on health risk assessment of pathogenic microorganism aerosol[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2015,5(3):287-292.
[10] 王莹,韩云平,李琳.卫生填埋场微生物气溶胶的逸散及潜在风险[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020,47(1):222-233. Wang Y, Han Y P, Li L. Emission and potential risks of bioaerosols in sanitary landfill[J]. Microbiology China, 2020,47(1):222-233.
[11] 孙琳,杨春华.美国近年生物恐怖袭击和生物实验室事故及其政策影响[J]. 军事医学, 2017,41(11):923-928. Sun L, Yang C H. United States bioterror attacks and laboratory accidents in recent years and the impact on its policy-making[J]. Military Medical Sciences, 2017,41(11):923-928.
[12] Bauer H, Kasper-Giebl A, Löflund M, et al. The contribution of bacteria and fungal spores to the organic carbon content of cloud water, precipitation and aerosols[J]. Atmos. Res., 2002,64:109-119.doi:10. 1016/S0169-8095(02)00084-4.
[13] Burrows S M, Elbert W, Lawrence M G, et al. Bacteria in the global atmosphere-Part 1:Review and synthesis of literature data for different ecosystems[J]. Atmos. Chemical Physics, 2009,doi:10.5194/acp-9-9263-2009.
[14] Fröhlich-Nowoisky J, Burrows S M, Xie Z, et al. Biogeography in the air:fungal diversity over land and oceans[J]. Biogeosciences, 2012, 9(103):1125-1136.
[15] Nishiuchi Y, Iwamoto T, Maruyama F. Infection sources of a common non-tuberculous mycobacterial pathogen, mycobacterium avium complex[J]. Front. Me., 2017,4:27.doi:10.3389/fmed. 2017.00027.
[16] Shin S K, Kim J, Ha S, et al. Metagenomic insights into the bioaerosols in the indoor and outdoor environments of childcare facilities[J]. PLoS. One, 2015,10:e0126960.doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0126960.
[17] Fujiyoshi S, Tanaka D, Maruyama F. Transmission of Airborne Bacteria across Built Environments and Its Measurement Standards:A Review[J]. Front. Microbiol., 2017,8:2336.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017. 02336.
[18] Park J W, Crowley D E. Normalization of soil DNA extraction for accurate quantification of target genes by real-time PCR and DGGE[J]. Biotechniques, 2005,38:579-586.doi:10.2144/05384ST04.
[19] Jain S, Basavaraj P, Singla A, et al. Bibliometric analysis of journal of clinical and diagnostic research (dentistry section, 2007~2014)[J]. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2015,9:ZC47-51.doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/11994.5834.
[20] GB17324-1998瓶装饮用纯净水卫生标准[S]. GB17324-1998 Hygienic standard for bottled purified drinking water[S].
[21] GB 5749-2006生活饮用水卫生标准[S]. GB 5749-2006 Hygienic standard for drinking water[S].
[22] Giles M, Morley N, Baggs E M, et al. Soil nitrate reducing processes-drivers, mechanisms for spatial variation, and significance for nitrous oxide production[J]. Front. Microbiol., 2012,3:407.doi:10.3389/fmicb. 2012.00407.
[23] Guo Y, Wu Y, Lin X, et al. Three successive extractions reduce quantification bias of microbial communities associated with incomplete DNA recovery in soil[J]. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao, 2012, 52:894-901.
[24] Gomes I B, Lemos M, Mathieu L, et al. The action of chemical and mechanical stresses on single and dual species biofilm removal of drinking water bacteria[J]. Sci. Total Environ., 2018,631-632:987-993.doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.042.