Abstract：Based on the particulate matter concentration and surface meteorological observation data of Lüliang city in Fenwei Plain from 2017 to 2019, this paper used backward trajectory cluster analysis and potential source contribution function (PSCF) methods to study the characteristics of PM10 and PM2.5 pollution and their potential source areas in winter in Lüliang city. Combining trajectory density analysis (TDA) and trajectory dwell time analysis (RTA) to supplement the classification of polluted transmission channels obtained by trajectory clustering analysis, and analyzed the transport characteristics of different transmission channels. This study found that the annual average concentration of particulate matter in Lüliang City decreased year by year from 2017 to 2019. Among them, PM10 decreased by 28μg/m3, PM2.5 decreased by 17μg/m3, and the decline was the largest in winter. The statistical analysis of the three-year winter wind direction, wind speed and concentration showed that the concentration of particulate matter in Lüliang was most significantly affected by the northeast and southwest winds because of the local topography of the Sanchuan River valley. The potential source area of PM10 pollution in Lüliang was mainly located in the southwest, and the potential source areas of PM2.5 pollution were mainly located in the southwest, east and southeast. The particulate pollution transmission channels can be summarized as: northwest, southwest and east (east and southeast) channels. The airflow in the northwest channel moved fast, passing through Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Gansu, and northern Shaanxi; The airflow in the southwest channel moved slowly, mainly passing through heavily polluted areas such as the Weihe Plain in central and southern Shaanxi. The airflow in the east channel moved slowly, it first traveled south along the eastern foot of the Taihang Mountains, and turned into Shanxi when passing through the valleys(Taihangxing, Jingxing, etc.) of the Taihang Mountains. When PM10 pollution occurred, the northwest channel contributed the most, and the eastern channel contributed the least, and the majority of these two channels was lightly polluted, accounting for about 90%. When PM2.5 pollution occurred, the proportion of light pollution under the three types of channels was lower than that of PM10. The proportion of moderate pollution and above under the southwest and east channels were about 50%, the areas passed by the southwest and east channels were exactly the potential source locations calculated by PSCF, which also showed that the southwest and easterly airflows were likely to transport pollutants to Lvliang. Finally, the three transportation channels were verified by the wind field simulation results of the WRF model, which shows that the transportation channel results obtained in this study are valid, and the complex terrain and variable airflow are an important factor in the transmission channel. The wind field simulation of the WRF model intuitively explains the three types of pollution transmission channels, and the complex terrain is an important factor in the formation of pollution transmission channels. The pollution transport channels in the northwest and southwest are mainly affected by the Lüliang Mountains, and the eastward pollution transport channel is mainly affected by the Taihang Mountains and its Henggu.
高兴艾, 裴坤宁, 王淑敏, 闫世明, 王雁, 蒋云盛. 汾渭平原吕梁市颗粒物潜在源及输送通道分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(7): 2988-2999.
GAO Xing-ai, PEI Kun-ning, WANG Shu-min, YAN Shi-ming, WANG Yan, JIANG Yun-sheng. Analysis on the potential source and transmission channel of particulate matter in Lüliang City, Fenwei Plain. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2022, 42(7): 2988-2999.
Yu Z, Li Y S, Chen Y S, et al. How is the environmental efficiency in the process of dramatic economic development in the Chinese cities?[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,98:349-362.
[2]
Cao S S, Zhao W J, Guan H L, et al. Comparison of remotely sensed PM2.5 concentrations between developed and developing countries:Results from the US, Europe, China, and India[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,182:672-681.
[3]
Li Y, Liao Q, Zhao X, et al. Premature mortality attributable to PM2.5 pollution in China during 2008~2016:Underlying causes and responses to emission reductions[J]. Chemosphere, 2020,263:127925.
[4]
戴海夏,宋伟民.大气PM2.5的健康影响[J].国外医学, 2001,28(5):299-303. Dai H X, Song W M. Health effects of atmospheric PM2.5[J]. Foreign Medical Science, 2001,28(5):299-303.
[5]
Gao X A, Cao X J, Wang J Y, et al. Analysis of aerosol optical properties in a Lanzhou suburb of China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2020,246:105098.
[6]
中国空气质量改善报告(2013~2018年)[R].北京:生态环境部, 2019.
[7]
王燕丽,薛文博,雷宇,等.京津冀地区典型月O3污染输送特征[J].中国环境科学, 2017,37(10):3684-3691. Wang Y L, Xue W B, Lei Y, et al. Model-derived source apportionment and regional transport matrix study of ozone in Jingjinji[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017,37(10):3684-3691.
[8]
刘旻霞,李亮,于瑞新,等.汾渭平原吸收性气溶胶时空演化及潜在源区分析[J].环境科学, 2021,42(6):2634-2647. Liu M X, Li L, Yu R X, et al. Spatial-temporal patterns and potential sources of absorbing aerosols in the Fenwei Plain[J]. Environmental Science, 2021,42(6):2634-2647.
[9]
杨斌,骆荣.长三角地区大气污染物的研究进展[J].环境生态学, 2019,1(5):74-78. Yang B, Luo R. Research progress of air pollution in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Environmental Ecology, 2019,1(5):74-78.
[10]
Zhu L L, Zhang Y H, Kan X. Transport paths and identification for potential sources of haze pollution in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration from 2014 to 2017[J]. Atmosphere, 2018,9:502.
[11]
Feng Y, Liu H N, Sun K. A sensitivity experiment of the air pollution transport in urban cluster over the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Environ Monit Forewarn, 2016,8:5-12.
[12]
邵玄逸,王晓琦,钟嶷盛,等.京津冀典型城市冬季人为源减排与气象条件对PM2.5污染影响[J].环境科学, 2021,42(9):4095-4103. Shao X Y, Wang X Q, Zhong Y S, et al. Impacts of anthropogenic emission reduction and meteorological conditions on PM2.5 pollution in typical cities of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei in winter[J]. Environmental Science, 2021,42(9):4095-4103.
[13]
薛文博,付飞,王金南,等.中国PM2.5跨区域传输特征数值模拟研究[J].中国环境科学, 2014,34(6):1361-1368. Xue W B, Fu F, Wang J N, et al. Numerical study on the characteristics of regional transport of PM2.5 in China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2014,34(6):1361-1368.
[14]
黄小刚,赵景波,孙从建,等.汾渭平原PM2.5空间分布的地形效应[J].环境科学, 2021,42(10):4582-4592. Huang X G, Zhao J B, Sun C J, et al. Orographic influences on the spatial distribution of pm on fenwei plain[J]. Environmental Science, 2021,42(10):4582-4592.
[15]
黄小刚,邵天杰,赵景波,等.汾渭平原PM2.5浓度的影响因素及空间溢出效应[J].中国环境科学, 2019,39(8):3539-3548. Huang X G, Shao T J, Zhao J B, et al. Influence factors and spillover effect of PM2.5 concentration on Fen-wei Plain[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(8):3539-3548.
[16]
张海东.西安市大气污染特征及颗粒物来源分析[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2020. Zhang H D. Characteristics of air pollution and source analysis of particulate matter in Xi'an[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an University of Architecture and echnology, 2020.
[17]
王妘涛,张强,温肖宇,等.运城市PM2.5时空分布特征和潜在源区季节分析[J].环境科学, 2022,43(1):74-84. Wang Y T, Zhang Q, Wen X Y, et al. Spatiotemporal distribution and seasonal characteristics of regional transport of PM2.5 in Yuncheng City[J]. Environmental Science, 2022,43(1):74-84.
[18]
王雁,高兴艾,裴坤宁,等.基于多站混合受体模型的临汾市PM2.5潜在源分析[J].中国环境科学, 2022,42(3):1032-1039. Wang Y, Gao X A, Pei k N, et al. Analysis of potential sources of PM2.5 in Linfen based on multi-site hybrid receptor model[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(3):1032-1039.
[19]
Draxler R R, Hess G D. Description of the HYSPLIT 4modelling system[R]. Sliver Spring, Maryland:NOAA, Air Resources Laboratory, 1997.
[20]
Cheng I, Zhang L, Blanchard P, et al. Concentration-weighted trajectory approach to identifying potential sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban coastal site in Nova Scotia, Canada[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry&Physics Discussions, 2013,13(2):6031-6048.
[21]
闫世明,王雁,郭伟,等.太原市秋冬季大气污染特征和输送路径及潜在源区分析[J].环境科学, 2019,40(11):60-68. Yan S M, Wang Y, Guo W, et al. Characteristics, transportation pathways and potential sources of air pollution during autumn and winter in Taiyuan[J]. Environmental Science, 2019,40(11):60-68.
[22]
Ashbaugh L L, Malm W C and Sadeh W Z. A residence time probability analysis of sulfur concentrations at grand Canyon National Park[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1985,19(8):1263-1270.
[23]
裴坤宁,高兴艾,王淑敏,等.晋东南地区冬季PM2.5污染输送路径分析[J].中国环境科学, 2022,42(2):557-567. Pei K N, Gao X A, Wang S M, et al. Analysis of PM2.5 pollution transportation path in winter in Southeast Shanxi Province[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(2):557-567.
[24]
郭蒙蒙,姜楠,王申博,等.郑州市2014~2017年大气污染特征及气象条件影响分析[J].环境科学, 2019,4(9):3856-3867. Guo M M, Jiang N, Wang S B, et al. Analysis on the of air pollution characteristics meteorological conditions in Zhengzhou from 2014 to 2017[J]. Environmental Science, 2019,4(9):3856-3867.
[25]
Zhang Y L, Cao F. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China at a city level[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015,5:14884.
[26]
闫世明,王雁,张岳军,等.五台山春季气溶胶传输特征[J].中国环境科学, 2020,40(2):497-505. Yan S M, Wang Y, Zhang Y J, et al. Influence of pollutant transport from both sides of Taihang Mountain on cross valley urban aerosol[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(2):497-505.
[27]
王棚飞.重庆市主城区大气污染物现状评价及影响因素分析[D].重庆:西南大学, 2018. Wang P F. Evaluation of atmospheric pollutants in the main urban areas of Chongqing and analysis of influencing factors[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University, 2018.
[28]
李雁宇,李杰,杨文夷,等.2018年汾渭平原及其周边地区大气颗粒物的传输特征[J].环境科学学报, 2020,40(3):779-791. Li Y Y, Li J, Yang W Y, et al. Transport characteristics of atmospheric particulates in Fenwei Plain and its surrounding regions in 2018[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2020,40(3):779-791.
[29]
王雁,郭伟,闫世明,等.太行山两侧污染物传输对横谷城市气溶胶的影响分析[J].环境科学, 2021,42(9):4104-4115. Wang Y, Guo, W, Yan S M, et al. Influence of pollutant transport from both sides of Taihang Mountain on cross valley urban aerosol[J]. Environmental Science, 42(9):4104-4115.
[30]
王跃,王莉莉,赵广娜,等.北京冬季PM2.5重污染时段不同尺度环流形势及边界层结构分析[J].气候与环境研究, 2014,19(2):173-184. Wang Y, Wang l L, Zhao G N, et al. Analysis of different-scales circulation patterns and boundary layer structure of PM2.5 heavy pollutions in Beijing during winter[J]. Climatic and Environmental Research, 2014,19(2):173-184.
