Comparison of UV/NaClO and UV/Sodium percarbonate processes for degradation of salicylic acid
MA Xiao-yan1, YANG Fan1, LI Qing-song2,3, YANG Qing-yun1, CHEN Guo-yuan2, LI Guo-xin2
1. College of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China; 2. Water Resource and Environment Institute, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Water Resources Utilization and Protection of Xiamen, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
Abstract：The degradation of salicylic acid (SA) in aqueous solution by UV/NaClO and UV/SPC processes was investigated. The effects of oxidizer types and dosage on SA removal were compared. The free radicals in the two processes were identified by quenching method and electron paramagnetic resonance(EPR) spectroscopy. The second-order rate constants of •OH and CO3•- with SA and the contributions of different components in the reaction system were determined by competitive kinetics. The removal of SA was compared in terms of environmental water samples simulation, acute toxicity and economic benefit. The pseudo-first-order kinetic rate constants of UV/NaClO and UV/SPC processes were 0.4378 and 0.3794min-1, respectively. •OH and Cl• were detected in UV/NaClO process, while O2•-, •OH and CO3•- were detected in UV/SPC process. The second-order rate constants of •OH and CO3•- with SA were calculated to be 3.97x109 and 8x107L/(mol×s), respectively. Reactive chlorine species (RCS) (79.91%) functioned a dominant role in the removal of SA in UV/NaClO process, while O2•-(51.75%) and •OH (41.42%) functioned a dominant role in UV/SPC process. The degradation of SA in environmental water samples by UV/NaClO and UV/SPC processes was inhibited, and the removal rates were reduced by 67% and 74%, respectively. The inhibition rate of UV/SPC process (25%) was 38% lower than that of UV/NaClO process(63%). The cost of UV/SPC process[37.1$/(m3×order)] was 9.3 times higher than that of UV/NaClO process[4.0$/(m3×order)] when SA degradation rate was above 97.5%. UV/NaClO process had higher economic benefit than UV/SPC process.
马晓雁, 杨帆, 李青松, 杨庆云, 陈国元, 李国新. UV/NaClO和UV/过碳酸钠工艺降解水杨酸的对比[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(3): 1182-1190.
MA Xiao-yan, YANG Fan, LI Qing-song, YANG Qing-yun, CHEN Guo-yuan, LI Guo-xin. Comparison of UV/NaClO and UV/Sodium percarbonate processes for degradation of salicylic acid. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2022, 42(3): 1182-1190.
Xiang Y, Wu H, Li L, et al.A review of distribution and risk of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the aquatic environment in China[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021,213:112044.
[2]
Peng X, Ou W, Wang C, et al.Occurrence and ecological potential of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in groundwater and reservoirs in the vicinity of municipal landfills in China[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2014,490:889-898.
[3]
Yang Y, Ok Y S, Kim K H, et al.Occurrences and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in drinking water and water/sewage treatment plants:A review[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2017,596-597:303-320.
[4]
Miklos D B, Wang W L, Linden K G, et al.Comparison of UV-AOPs (UV/H2O2, UV/PDS and UV/Chlorine) for TOrC removal from municipal wastewater effluent and optical surrogate model evaluation[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019,362:537-547.
[5]
Yu X, Kamali M, Van Aken P, et al.Synergistic effects of the combined use of ozone and sodium percarbonate for the oxidative degradation of dichlorvos[J].Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2021,39:101721.
[6]
Ma D, Yi H, Lai C, et al.Critical review of advanced oxidation processes in organic wastewater treatment[J].Chemosphere, 2021, 275:130104.
[7]
Li S, Ao X, Li C, et al.Insight into PPCP degradation by UV/NH2Cl and compareson with UV/NaClO:Kinetics, reaction mechanism, and DBP formation[J].Water Research, 2020,182:115967.
[8]
Kong X, Wu Z, Ren Z, et al.Degradation of lipid regulators by the UV/chlorine process:Radical mechanisms, chlorine oxide radical (ClO•)-mediated transformation pathways and toxicity changes[J].Water Research, 2018,137:242-250.
[9]
Wang J, Wang S.Effect of inorganic anions on the performance of advanced oxidation processes for degradation of organic contaminants[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021,411:128392.
[10]
Yue L, Cheng J, Hua J, et al.A sodium percarbonate/ultraviolet system generated free radicals for degrading capsaicin to alleviate inhibition of methane production during anaerobic digestion of lipids and food waste[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2021,761:143269.
[11]
Yan P, Sui Q, Lyu S, et al.Elucidation of the oxidation mechanisms and pathways of sulfamethoxazole degradation under Fe (II) activated percarbonate treatment[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 640-641:973-980.
[12]
Gao J, Duan X, O'shea K, et al.Degradation and transformation of bisphenol A in UV/Sodium percarbonate:Dual role of carbonate radical anion[J].Water Research, 2020,171:115394.
[13]
Diaz-Uribe C E, Daza M C, Martínez F, et al.Visible light superoxide radical anion generation by tetra (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin/TiO2:EPR characterization[J].Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A:Chemistry, 2010,215(2/3):172-178.
[14]
Eslami A, Mehdipour F, Lin K-Y A, et al.Sono-photo activation of percarbonate for the degradation of organic dye:The effect of water matrix and identification of by-products[J].Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2020,33:100998.
[15]
Ma J, Minakata D, O'shea K, et al.Determination and Environmental Implications of Aqueous-Phase Rate Constants in Radical Reactions[J].Water Research, 2021,190:116746.
[16]
Wojnarovits L, Toth T, Takacs E.Rate constants of carbonate radical anion reactions with molecules of environmental interest in aqueous solution:A review[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2020,717:137219.
[17]
Huang X, Wang Y, Li X, et al.Autocatalytic decomplexation of Cu (II)-EDTA and simultaneous removal of aqueous Cu (II) by UV/chlorine[J].Environmental Science& Technology, 2019,53(4):2036-2044.
[18]
Li T, Jiang Y, An X, et al.Transformation of humic acid and halogenated byproduct formation in UV-chlorine processes[J].Water Research, 2016,102:421-427.
[19]
Wang J, Wang S.Reactive species in advanced oxidation processes:Formation, identification and reaction mechanism[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020,401:126158.
[20]
Peralta E, Roa G, Hernandez-Servin J A, et al.Hydroxyl Radicals quantification by UV spectrophotometry[J].Electrochimica Acta, 2014,129:137-141.
[21]
Kwon M, Yoon Y, Kim S, et al.Removal of sulfamethoxazole, ibuprofen and nitrobenzene by UV and UV/chlorine processes:A comparative evaluation of 275nm LED-UV and 254nm LP-UV[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018,637-638:1351-1357.
[22]
Zeng T, Arnold W A.Pesticide photolysis in prairie potholes:probing photosensitized processes[J].Environmental Science& Technology, 2013,47(13):6735-6745.
[23]
李博强,马晓雁,李青松,等.UV-LED/NaClO工艺对水中对乙酰氨基酚的降解[J].中国环境科学, 2019,39(11):4681-4688.Li B Q, Ma X Y, Li Q S, et al.Degradation of acetaminophen in aqueous by UV-LED/NaClO process[J].China Environmental Science, 2019,39(11):4681-4688.
[24]
Zhang Y, Yao X, Wu Q, et al.Turbidity prediction of lake-type raw water using random forest model based on meteorological data:A case study of Tai lake, China[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2021,290:112657.
[25]
Setareh P, Khezri S M, Hossaini H, et al.Coupling effect of ozone/ultrasound with coagulation for improving NOM and turbidity removal from surface water[J].Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2020,37:101340.
[26]
Lu X, Shao Y, Gao N, et al.Investigation of clofibric acid removal by UV/persulfate and UV/chlorine processes:Kinetics and formation of disinfection byproducts during subsequent chlor (am) ination[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018,331:364-371.
[27]
Zupanc M, Petkovšek M, Zevnik J, et al.Anomalies detected during hydrodynamic cavitation when using salicylic acid dosimetry to measure radical production[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 396:125389.
[28]
Wu Y, Deng L, Bu L, et al.Degradation of diethyl phthalate (DEP) by vacuum ultraviolet process:influencing factors, oxidation products, and toxicity assessment[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019,26(6):5435-5444.
