基于磷回收的低温微氧EBPR系统的表观与微观特性

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (797 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要在低溶解氧(DO = 1mg/L)条件下启动2个厌氧/好氧交替运行的SBR(A/O-SBR),中温(22±1)℃SBR1和低温(14±1)℃SBR2,考察侧流磷回收工艺对低耗主流强化生物除磷(EBPR)系统污染物去除性能､微生物种群结构和磷回收潜能的影响.结果表明,SBR1和SBR2的脱氮及COD去除性能未受磷回收操作的影响,但是在除磷方面,SBR1的EBPR性能更稳定,对侧流磷剥夺更耐受,平均除磷率达90.7%,而SBR2在侧流磷回收阶段的平均除磷率为78.4%.此外,基于侧流磷回收的微氧EBPR系统可在低温下保持较为稳定的生物质浓度(VSS),但实施侧流磷回收后SVI值由104.6mL/g升至216.8mL/g,系统发生污泥膨胀.基于16S rRNA的高通量测序结果表明,主流系统的微生物种群结构在侧流磷回收阶段发生了较大变化,Candidatus Competibacter､Flavobacterium(黄杆菌属)和Dechloromonas(脱氯单胞菌属)骤增,Candidatus Accumulibacter的相对丰度从12.5%降至6.4%.经计算,在1/3侧流比前提下SBR1与SBR2的磷回收潜能分别为68.8%和69.4%.总的来说,微氧EBPR系统的运行温度是保证侧流磷回收稳定进行所要考虑的重要因素之一.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	田文清
	俞小军
	邓颖
	蔡雨麒
	靳海东
	康素琴
	马娟

关键词 ： A/O-SBR, 厌氧侧流磷回收, 低温, 低溶解氧, EBPR

Abstract：Two alternative anaerobic/oxic SBR (A/O-SBR) reactors controlled at medium temperature (22±1)℃SBR1and low temperature (14±1)℃SBR2were operated to investigate the effect of side-stream phosphorus recovery on nutrients removal performance, microbial community structure and phosphorus recovery potential of mainstream EBPR systems under low dissolved oxygen (DO = 1mg/L). The results showed that the nitrogen and COD removal performance of SBR1and SBR2 were not influenced by the introduction of side-stream phosphorus recovery. In terms of phosphorus removal, however, EBPR performance of SBR1was more stable and more tolerant to phosphorus deprivation. During the phase of side-stream phosphorus recovery, the average efficiency of phosphorus removal in SBR1reached 90.7%, while SBR2 was 78.4%. It was also found that microaerobic EBPR subjected to side-stream phosphorus recovery could maintain a relatively stable volatile suspended solids (VSS) concentration at low temperature. While the value of SVI increased from 104.6mL/g to 216.8mL/g after side-stream phosphorus recovery, resulting in sludge bulking in SBR2 system. The result of high-throughput sequencing based on 16S rRNA showed that the microbial community structure of the mainstream system changed significantly after side-stream phosphorus recovery. The relative abundances of Candidatus Competibacter, Flavobacterium and Dechloromonas rapidly increased and Candidatus Accumulibacter fell from 12.5% to 6.4%. It was estimated that the average phosphorus recovery potential of SBR1 and SBR2 were 68.8% and 69.4%, respectively, with the side-stream ratio of 1/3. In a conclusion, the temperature was one of the important factors to ensure the stable operation of side-stream phosphorus recovery in an EBPR system under low DO.

Key words： A/O-SBR anaerobic side-stream phosphorus recovery low temperature low DO EBPR

收稿日期: 2021-08-30

PACS:

X703.1

基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(52060013);兰州市人才创新创业项目(2019-RC-109);兰州交通大学天佑创新团队项目(TY202005)

通讯作者: 马娟,教授,meggyma@163.com E-mail: meggyma@163.com

作者简介: 田文清(1995-),女,陕西西安人,兰州交通大学硕士研究生,主要研究方向为废水生物处理.发表论文4篇.

引用本文:

田文清, 俞小军, 邓颖, 蔡雨麒, 靳海东, 康素琴, 马娟. 基于磷回收的低温微氧EBPR系统的表观与微观特性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(4): 1625-1634. TIAN Wen-qing, YU Xiao-jun, DENG Ying, CAI Yu-qi, JIN Hai-dong, KANG Su-qin, MA Juan. Apparent and microscopic performance of low temperature and low dissolved oxygen EBPR system subjected to side-stream phosphorus recovery. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2022, 42(4): 1625-1634.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V42/I4/1625

[1]	周大通,鲍荣华.世界磷矿生产消费格局及其变化[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2015,30(1):1-4. Zhou D T, Bao R H. Production, consumption structure and its change of phosphate rock in the world[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2015,30(1):1-4.
[2]	杜春丽,黄曼,洪诗佳.我国磷矿资源开发利用研究综述[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2019,32(4):32-38. Du C L, Huang M, Hong S J. Research review on development and utilization of phosphate resources in China[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China, 2019,32(4):32-38.
[3]	张玲.高温聚磷菌的培养及温度影响[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2017. Zhang L. The cultivation and temperature coefficient test of PAOHT[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2017.
[4]	Yuan Z, Pratt S, Batstone D J. Phosphorus recovery from wastewater through microbial processes[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2012,23(6):878-883.
[5]	陈仁杰,荆肇乾,谢禹,等.污水生物强化磷回收技术研究[J]. 应用化工, 2021,50(5):1377-1381. Chen R J, Jing Z Q, Xie Y, et al. Research on wastewater biological enhanced phosphorus recovery technology[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2021,50(5):1377-1381.
[6]	杨蕊春.厌氧侧流磷回收对低耗主流EBPR系统除磷性能及微生物种群结构的影响[D]. 兰州:兰州交通大学, 2020. Yang R C. Effect of anaerobic side-stream phosphorus recovery on phosphorus removal performance and microbial population structure of mainstream EBPR subjected to low-consumption[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2020.
[7]	Lv J H, Yuan L J. Effects of chemical phosphate precipitation in the side stream process on biological phosphorus removal at the anaerobic stage in an anaerobic-aerobic sequencing batch reactor[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2015,54(11):3011-3019.
[8]	郝晓地,衣兰凯,王克巍.强化低碳源污水生物除磷的技术方式探究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2012,28(1):95-99. Hao X D, Yi L K, Wang K W. Study on technical methods for enhancing biological phosphorus removal from wastewater with low carbon source[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2012,28(1):95-99.
[9]	吕景花.厌氧释磷上清液侧流化学磷回收对主流生物除磷系统的影响研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2015. Lv J H. Study on the effects of chemical phosphorus recovery from supernatants of anaerobic stage in side stream on the performance of main stream system of EBPR[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2015.
[10]	黄健,汤利华,唐玉朝,等.化学除磷比值对低碳源污水脱氮除磷的影响[J]. 中国给水排水, 2012,28(3):94-97,101. Huang J, Tang L H, Tang Y C, et al. Effect of chemical phosphorus removal ratio on nitrogen and phosphorus removal from low carbon municipal wastewater[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2012,28(3):94-97,101.
[11]	杨蕊春,俞小军,赵元添,等.溶解氧对EBPR主流除磷及侧流磷回收性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2020,14(2):387-394. Yang R C, Yu X J, Zhao Y T, et al. Effect of dissolved oxygen on main-stream phosphorus removal and side-stream phosphorus recovery performance of EBPR[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2020,14(2):387-394.
[12]	郝晓地,戴吉,周军,等.磷回收提高生物除磷效果的验证[J]. 中国给水排水, 2006,22(17):22-25. Hao X D, Dai J, Zhou J, et al. Experimental verification on enhancing bio-P removal by phosphorus recovery from anaerobic supernatant[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2006,22(17):22-25.
[13]	何黎.侧流磷回收工艺对主流生物除磷效能的影响研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2019. He L. Study on the effect of side stream phosphorus recovery process on main biological phosphorus removal efficiency[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019.
[14]	Hesselmann R P X, Werlen C, Hahn D, et al. Enrichment, phylogenetic analysis and detection of a bacterium that performs enhanced biological phosphate removal in activated sludge[J]. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 1999,22(3):454-465.
[15]	GB18918-2002城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准[S]. GB18918-2002 Discharge standard of pollutants for municipal wastewater treatment plant[S].
[16]	刘宏,彭永臻,卢炯元,等.温度对间歇曝气SBR短程硝化及硝化活性的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2017,38(11):4656-4663. Liu H, Peng Y Z, Lu J Y, et al. Effects of temperature on shortcut nitrification and nitrification activity of nitrification in an intermittent aeration sequencing batch reactor[J]. Environmental Science, 2017,38(11):4656-4663.
[17]	陆浩良,田晴,朱艳彬,等.耐低温生物脱氮机制与对策研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020,39(1):372-379. Lu H L, Tian Q, Zhu Y B, et al. State of the art for mechanisms and countermeasures of low temperature biological nitrogen removal[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020,39(1):372-379.
[18]	赵丽君,方芳,郭劲松,等.溶解氧对SBR脱氮性能与脱氮方式的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015,9(3):1148-1154. Zhao L J, Fang F, Guo J S, et al. Impacts of dissolved oxygen level on nitrogen removal efficiencies and pathways in a sequential batch reactor[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015,9(3):1148-1154.
[19]	郝晓地,衣兰凯,付昆明.侧流磷回收强化低碳源污水脱氮除磷效果的模拟与实验研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013,7(1):231-236. Hao X D, Yi L K, Fu K M. Modeling and experimental study on enhancing effect of BNR by phosphate recovery in side-stream of anaerobic supernatant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013,7(1):231-236.
[20]	Oehmen A, Lemos P C, Carvalho G, et al. Advances in enhanced biological phosphorus removal:From micro to macro scale[J]. Water Research, 2007,41(11):2271-2300.
[21]	Shen N, Chen Y, Zhou Y. Multi-cycle operation of enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) with different carbon sources under high temperature[J]. Water Research, 2017,114(5):308-315.
[22]	刘长青,毕学军,张峰,等.低温对生物脱氮除磷系统影响的试验研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2006,4(8):18-21. Liu C Q, Bi X J, Zhang F, et al. Effect of low temperature on biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal system[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2006,4(8):18-21.
[23]	马娟,宋璐,俞小军,等.侧流磷回收对低溶解氧EBPR系统性能的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2017,38(3):1130-1136. Ma J, Song L, Yu X J, et al. Effects of side-stream phosphorus recovery on the performance of EBPR system under low dissolved oxygen condition[J] Environmental Science, 2017,38(3):1130-1136.
[24]	Lv J H, Yuan L J, Chen X, et al. Phosphorus metabolism and population dynamics in a biological phosphate-removal system with simultaneous anaerobic phosphate stripping[J]. Chemosphere, 2014,117(5):715-721.
[25]	姜涛.温度与碳源对生物除磷系统中PAO和GAO影响及除磷效能研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2011. Jiang T. Effects of temperature and carbon sources on phosphate accumulating and glycogen accumulating organisms and phosphorus removal efficiency in biological phosphorus removal process[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011.
[26]	樊香妮.温度对强化生物除磷(EBPR)系统处理性能及种群关系的影响[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2016. Fan X N. The effect of temperature on the performance and microbial community structure of enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) system[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2016.
[27]	王建辉,孙凤,辛思雨,等.温度对强生物除磷系统中聚磷菌和聚糖菌竞争影响[J]. 吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,39(3):100- 106. Wang J H, Sun F, Xin S Y, et al. Effect of temperature on the competition between polyphosphate bacteria and glycogen bacteria in biological phosphorus removal system[J]. Journal of Jilin Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2018,39(3):100-106.
[28]	Yu X J, Tian W Q, Deng Y, et al. Nutrient removal and phosphorus recovery performance of an anaerobic side-stream extraction based enhanced biological phosphorus removal subjected to low dissolved oxygen[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2021,42.
[29]	Welles L, Lopez V C M, Hooijmans C M, et al. Prevalence of 'Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis' type II under phosphate limiting conditions.[J]. AMB Express, 2016,6:44.
[30]	席粉鹊,袁林江,吕景花.侧流化学除磷对AO连续流生物除磷系统的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014,8(12):5231-5236. Xi F Q, Yuan L J, Lv J H. Effects of anaerobic supernatant stripping process on AO phosphorus removal system[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014,8(12):5231-5236.
[31]	Welles L, Tian W D, Saad S, et al. Accumulibacter clades Type I and II performing kinetically different glycogen-accumulating organisms metabolisms for anaerobic substrate uptake[J]. Water Research, 2015,83:354-366.
[32]	Ma J, Yang R C, Yu X J, et al. Investigation of anaerobic side-stream phosphorus recovery and its effect on the performance of mainstream EBPR subjected to low-consumption[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2019,80(10):1943-1955.
[33]	申童童,袁林江,温丹丹,等.侧流污泥返送到缺氧池对A2/O系统效能影响研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(9):3335-3342. Shen T T, Yuan L J, Wen D D, et al. Effect of side-stream sludge returning to anoxic tank on A2/O system effectiveness[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(9):3335-3342.
[34]	李楠.SBR系统在低温条件下的废水生物除磷性能及除磷途径分析[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2010. Li N. Performance and removal approaches of biological phosphorus removal from wastewater in SBR under low temperature[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010.