Abstract:This paper researched the building life cycle carbon footprint based on a representative modern timber building in China, and a method of splitting the carbon emission of negative carbon building materials into the carbon emission of the production process and the biological carbon sequestration value was proposed. The results showed that the carbon emissions of the life cycle of the modern timber office building were 1.69×107kgCO2e, in which the product stage accounted for 15.56%, the use stage accounted for 84.34%, and the end-of-life stage accounted for 0.10%. The carbon emission in the product stage of timber building was lower than that of traditional reinforced concrete or steel buildings.
苏鹏宇, 姚恩明, 李征. 基于全生命周期的现代木结构建筑碳足迹研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023, 43(12): 6657-6666.
SU Peng-yu, YAO En-ming, LI Zheng. Investigation into the carbon footprints of modern timber buildings based on life cycle assessment. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2023, 43(12): 6657-6666.
[1] 建筑能耗与碳排放数据专业委员会.2022年度中国城乡建设领域碳排放系列研究报告[R]. 北京:中国建筑节能协会, 2023. Professional Committee on Building Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission Data. 2022 China urban rural construction carbon emission series research report[R]. China Association of Building Energy Efficiency, 2023. [2] Zhang X, Wang F. Life-cycle assessment and control measures for carbon emissions of typical buildings in China[J]. Building and Environment, 2015,86:89-97. [3] Rabani M, Madessa H B, Ljungström M, et al. Life cycle analysis of GHG emissions from the building retrofitting: The case of a Norwegian office building[J]. Building and Environment, 2021,204: 108159. [4] Robati M, Daly D, Kokogiannakis G. A method of uncertainty analysis for whole-life embodied carbon emissions (CO2-e) of building materials of a net-zero energy building in Australia[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,225:541-553. [5] Yu M, Robati M, Oldfield P, et al. The impact of value engineering on embodied greenhouse gas emissions in the built environment: A hybrid life cycle assessment[J]. Building and Environment, 2020,168: 106452. [6] Macinnis-Ng C, Wyse S V, Webb T, et al. Sustained carbon uptake in a mixed age southern conifer forest[J]. Trees, 2017,31:967-980. [7] Uri V, Kukumägi M, Aosaar J, et al. Carbon budgets in fertile grey alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench.) stands of different ages[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2017,396:55-67. [8] 何敏娟,何桂荣,梁峰,等.中国木结构近20年发展历程[J]. 建筑结构, 2019,49(19):83-90. He M J, He G R, Liang F, etc. Development of timber structures in China during recent twenty years[J]. Building Structure, 2019,49(19): 83-90. [9] Du Q, Zhang R, Cai C, et al. Factors influencing modern timber structure building development in China[J]. Sustainability, 2021,13(14):7936. [10] 谌晓梦.我国木结构建筑的起源与发展[J]. 城市住宅, 2020, 27(2):58-60. Shen X M. Origin and Development of Timber Structures in China[J]. City & House, 27(2):58-60. [11] 王瑞胜,陈有亮,陈诚.我国现代木结构建筑发展战略研究[J]. 林产工业, 2019,56(9):1-5. Wang R S, Chen Y L, Chen C. Study on the Development Strategies of Modern Timber Buildings in China[J]. China Forest Products Industry, 2019,56(9):1-5. [12] 尚春静,储成龙,张智慧.不同结构建筑生命周期的碳排放比较[J]. 建筑科学, 2011,27(12):66-70. Shang C J, Chu C L, Zhang Z H. Quantitative Assessment on Carbon Emission of Different Structures in Building Life Cycle[J]. Building Science, 2011,27(12):66-70. [13] 徐伟涛.基于LCA法的木结构建筑使用阶段碳排放探讨[J]. 林产工业, 2021,58(2):36-38. Xu W T. Review on Carbon Emission of Timber Building During Its Service Stage Based on LCA Method[J]. China Forest Products Industry, 2021,58(2):36-38. [14] Li Z, Chen F, He M, et al. Experimental Investigation on Self-Centering Steel-Timber Hybrid Beam-Column Connections[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2023,149(3):04022256. [15] Sun X, He M, Li Z. Novel engineered wood and bamboo composites for structural applications: State-of-art of manufacturing technology and mechanical performance evaluation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020,249:118751. [16] Schmidt M, Crawford R H, Warren-Myers G. Integrating life-cycle GHG emissions into a building's economic evaluation[J]. Buildings and Cities, 2020,1(1). [17] GB/T 51366-2019建筑碳排放计算标准[S]. GB/T 51366-2019 Standard for building carbon emission calculation[S]. [18] 江苏省建筑与装饰工程消耗量定额[Z]. 江苏:江苏省建设工程造价管理总站, 2022. Consumption quota of construction and decoration engineering in Jiangsu Province[Z]. Construction Engineering Cost Management Station of Jiangsu Province, 2022. [19] GB 50034-2013建筑照明设计标准[S]. GB 50034-2013 Standard for lighting design of buildings[S]. [20] DeST团队. DeST-C User Manual[EB/OL]. 清华大学, 2008, https: //www.dest.net.cn/zy. [21] 杨志伟,于瑾,李奎波,等.基于DeST-C的通风对办公建筑能耗影响的模拟分析[J]. 江西理工大学学报, 2015,36(5):67-73. Yang Z W, Yu J, Li K B, et al. Numerical simulation research on the effects of ventilation on office building energy consumption based on DeST-C[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 2015,36(5):67-73. [22] Zhang L, Hou C, Hou J, et al. Optimization analysis of thermal insulation layer attributes of building envelope exterior wall based on DeST and life cycle economic evaluation[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2019,14:100410. [23] DB31/T 680-2012城市公共用水定额及其计算方法[S]. DB31/T 680-2012 Urban public water-consumption and its calculation method[S]. [24] JGJ 144-2019外墙外保温工程技术标准[S]. JGJ 144-2019 Technical standard for external thermal insulation on walls[S]. [25] GB/T 8478-2020铝合金门窗[S]. GB/T 8478-2020 Aluminum windows and door[S]. [26] GB 50345-2012屋面工程技术规范[S]. GB 50345-2012 Technical code for roof engineering[S]. [27] Gong X, Nie Z, Wang Z, et al. Life cycle energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission of residential building designs in Beijing: A comparative study[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2012,16(4): 576-587. [28] 李岳岩,张凯,李金潞.居住建筑全生命周期碳排放对比分析与减碳策略[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报, 2021,53(5):737-745. Li Y Y, Zhang K, Li J L. Comparative analysis of carbon emission throughout the life cycle of residential buildings and carbon reduction strategy[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, 2021,53(5):737-745. [29] 陈亚坤.基于数据融合的建筑垃圾运输节点管控研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2021. Chen Y K. Research on Management and Control of Construction Waste Transportation Node Based on Data Fusion[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021. [30] ISO. ISO 14040:2006/Amd 1:2020 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework — Amendment 1[S]. [31] 亿科.在线LCA评价系统[OL]. http://v2.efootprint.net/#/home. IKE. Online LCA system[OL]. http://v2.efootprint.net/#/home. [32] Zhao H L, Liu F, Liu H Q, et al. Comparative life cycle assessment of two ceramsite production technologies for reusing municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash in China[J]. Waste Management, 2020,113: 447-455. [33] Lv L, Song G, Zhao X, et al. Environmental Burdens of China's Propylene manufacturing: Comparative life-cycle assessment and scenario analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,799: 149451. [34] Athena Sustainable Materials Institute. A Life Cycle Assessment of Cross-Laminated Timber Produced in Canada[Z]. Canada, 2013,https://www.athenasmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/CtoG-LCA-Canadian-CLT.pdf. [35] Athena Sustainable Materials Institute. A Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Canadian Oriented Strand Board-OSB[Z]. Canada, 2018,https://www.athenasmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CtoG-LCA-of-Canadian-OSB.pdf. [36] Athena Sustainable Materials Institute. A Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Surfaced Dry Softwood Lumber Produced in British Columbia[Z]. Canada, 2021, https://www.athenasmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CtoG-LCA-of-BC-Surfaced-Dry-Softwood-Lumber.pdf. [37] Athena Sustainable Materials Institute. A Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Glulam Produced in British Columbia[Z]. Canada, 2022,https://www.athenasmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CtoG-LCA-of-BC-Glulam.pdf. [38] BSI. PAS 2050:2011Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services[S]. [39] Hawkins W, Cooper S, Allen S, et al. Embodied carbon assessment using a dynamic climate model: Case-study comparison of a concrete, steel and timber building structure[C]//Structures. Elsevier, 2021,33: 90-98. [40] UNFCCC. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its nineteenth session[Z]. 2013, https://unfccc.int/documents/8106. [41] 张华娣.南京地区办公建筑全生命周期碳排放测算[J]. 建筑热能通风空调, 2022,41(8):34-36,46. Zhang H D. Carbon emission calculation in whole life cycle of office buildings in Nanjing[J]. Building Energy & Environment, 2022,41(8): 34-36,46. [42] Yang X, Zhang S, Wang K. Quantitative study of life cycle carbon emissions from 7timber buildings in China[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021,26(9):1721-1734. [43] Ma L, Zhang L. Evolutionary game analysis of construction waste recycling management in China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020,161:104863. [44] 黄娜,王洪涛,范辞冬,等.基于不确定度和敏感度分析的LCA数据质量评估与控制方法[J]. 环境科学学报, 2012,(6):1529-1536. Huang N, Wang H T, Xue C D, et al. LCA data quality assessment and control based on uncertainty and sensitivity analysis[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 32(6):1529-153. [45] Ubando A T, Culaba A B, Aviso K B, et al. Fuzzy mixed-integer linear programming model for optimizing a multi-functional bioenergy system with biochar production for negative carbon emissions[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2014,16:1537-1549.