胶态微泡沫用于冲洗含水层的迁移分布特征

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1067 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目前有关胶态微泡沫（CGAs）冲洗含水层过程中的迁移分布特性尚不明确，本研究利用二维模拟实验详细探究了注入速率、表面活性剂浓度和介质条件对CGAs迁移分布时空变化特征的影响.结果表明，在单侧单点注入条件下，CGAs的波及区域形状近似半圆形，迁移锋面相对规则；CGAs破裂产生的泡沫液分布在其迁移锋面四周，泡沫气体受地下水浮力影响向上方迁移，导致出现在纵向向上迁移距离大于向下迁移距离的"向上漂移"现象.表面活性剂浓度对CGAs的迁移分布影响较小；注入流速低或介质渗透性差，CGAs均会在迁移后期出现明显的“向上漂移”现象，同时其波及区域形状逐渐趋向于半椭圆形；恒定流量注入CGAs，其在含水层中的波及面积存在最大值.相对传统液相冲洗液，CGAs在非均质含水层中迁移分布较为均匀，受介质非均质性影响较小.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	何宇
	郭超
	付玉丰
	张成武
	张婧懿
	秦传玉

关键词 ：胶态微泡沫(CGAs), 含水层, 迁移分布, 影响因素

Abstract：At present, the migration and distribution characteristics of colloidal gas aphrons (CGAs) during the flushing of aquifers are not clear. In this study, the effects of injection rate, surfactant concentration and media conditions on the spatial and temporal variation characteristics of the migration and distribution of CGAs were investigated in detail using two-dimensional simulation experiments. The results showed that under single-point and single-side injection conditions, the shape of the sweeping area of CGAs was approximately semi-circular, and the migration front was relatively regular. Besides, the foam liquid generated by the bursting of CGAs was distributed around its migration front, and the foam gas migrated upward due to the influence of groundwater buoyancy, resulting in the "drift up" phenomenon that the upward migration distance in the vertical direction was greater than the downward migration distance. As for surfactant concentration, it had little effect on the migration and distribution of CGAs. When the injection velocity was low or the permeability of the media was poor, CGAs appeared an obvious "drift up" phenomenon in the later stage of migration, at the same time, the shape of the sweeping area gradually tended to be semi-elliptical. There was a maximum sweeping area in the aquifer when CGAs were injected at a constant flow. In all, compared with traditional liquid flushing fluids, the migration and distribution of CGAs in the heterogeneous aquifer was relatively uniform and less affected by the heterogeneity of the media.

Key words： colloidal gas aphrons (CGAs) aquifer migration and distribution affecting factors

收稿日期: 2020-06-22

PACS:

X523

基金资助:水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2018ZX07109-003）；国家重点研发计划“土壤”专项（2018YFC1802500）

通讯作者: 秦传玉,教授,qincyu@jlu.edu.cn E-mail: qincyu@jlu.edu.cn

作者简介: 何宇(1995-),女,吉林公主岭人,吉林大学硕士研究生,主要从事水土污染控制与修复方面的研究.发表论文1篇.

引用本文:

何宇, 郭超, 付玉丰, 张成武, 张婧懿, 秦传玉. 胶态微泡沫用于冲洗含水层的迁移分布特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(2): 720-726. HE Yu, GUO Chao, FU Yu-feng, ZHANG Cheng-wu, ZHANG Jing-yi, QIN Chuan-yu. The migration and distribution characteristics of colloidal gas aphrons during its flushing of aquifer. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2021, 41(2): 720-726.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V41/I2/720

[1]	Paria S. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of organic contaminated soils and water[J]. Advanced Colloidal Interface Science, 2008,138:24-58.
[2]	Laha S, Tansel B, Ussawarujikulehai A. Surfactant-soil interactions during surfactant-amended remediation of contaminated soils by hydrophobic organic compounds:A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009,90:95-100.
[3]	李隋.表面活性剂强化抽取处理修复DNAPL污染含水层的实验研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2008.Li S. Research on surfactant enhanced pump and treat remediation of a DNAPL contaminated aquifer[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2008.
[4]	赵勇胜.地下水污染场地污染的控制与修复[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2007,37(2):303-310.Zhao Y S. Groundwater pollution control and remediation[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2007,37(2):303-310.
[5]	Li R Z, Szecsody J, Oostrom M, et al. Enhanced remedial amendment delivery to subsurface using shear thinning fluid and aqueous foam[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011,191(1-3):249-257.
[6]	Wang H, Chen J J. A study on the permeability and flow behavior of surfactant foam in unconsolidated media[J]. Environmental Earth Science, 2013,68:567-576.
[7]	Hayden N, Diebold J, Farrell C, et al. Characterization and removal of DNAPL from sand and clay layered media[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2006,86(1/2):53-71.
[8]	Mulligan C N, Wang S L. Remediation of a heavy metalcontaminated soil by a rhamnolipid foam[J]. Engineering Geology, 2006,85:75-81.
[9]	Conrad S H, Glass R J, Peplinski W J. Bench-scale visualization of DNAPL remediation processes in analog heterogeneous aquifers:Surfactant floods and in situ oxidation using permanganate[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2002,58(1):13-49.
[10]	Dermont G, Bergeron M, Mercier G, et al. Soil washing for metal removal:A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008,152:1-31.
[11]	Szafranski R, Lawson J B, Hirasaki G J, et al. Surfactant/foam process for improved efficiency of aquifer remediation[J]. Structure, Dynamics and Properties of Disperse Colloidal Systems, 1998,111:162-167.
[12]	Chowdiah P, Misra B R, Kilbane II J J, et al. Foam propagation through soils for enhanced in-situ remediation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1998,62(3):265-280.
[13]	Shen X, Lin Z B, Ding Y Z, et al. Foam, a promising vehicle to deliver nanoparticles for vadose zone remediation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011,186:1773-1780.
[14]	Longpré-Girard M, Martel R, Robert T, et al. 2D sandbox experiments of surfactant foams for mobility control and enhanced LNAPL recovery in layered soils[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2016,193:63-73.
[15]	Zhang Z F, Mark L Z, White D, et al. Experimental investigation of the effective foam viscosity in unsaturated porous media[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2012,11:421-427.
[16]	Huang C W, Chang C H. A laboratory study on foam-enhanced surfactant solution flooding in removing n-pentadecane from contaminated[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2000,173(1):171-179.
[17]	Wang S L, Mulliga C N. An evaluation of surfactant foam technology in remediation of contaminated soil[J]. Chemosphere, 2004,57(9):1079-1089.
[18]	Maire J, Fatin-Rouge N. Surfactant foam flushing for in situ removal of DNAPLs in shallow soils[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017,321:247-255.
[19]	Rothmel R K, Peters R W, Martin E S, et al. Surfactant foam/bioaugmentation technology for in situ treatment of TCE-DNAPLs[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1998,32(11):1667-1675.
[20]	Pasdar M, Kazemzadeh E, Kamari E, et al. Insight into the behavior of colloidal gas aphron (CGA) fluids at elevated pressures:An experimental study[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A, 2018,537:250-258.
[21]	Ziaee H, Arabloo M, Ghazanfari M H, et al. Herschel-Bulkley rheological parameters of lightweight colloidal gas aphron (CGA) based fluids[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2015,93:21-29.
[22]	Juaidyah A, Jaber M H A. Use of colloidal gas aphron in subsurface treatment of soil[D]. Florida:University of Florida, 2006.
[23]	Arabloo M, Shahri M P. Experimental studies on stability and viscoplastic modeling of colloidal gas aphron (CGA) based drilling fluids[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2014,113:8-22.
[24]	Boonamnuayvitaya V, Jutaporn P, Sae-ung S, et al. Removal of pyrene by colloidal gas aphrons of a biodegradable surfactant[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2009,68:411-416.
[25]	Couto H J B, Massarani G, Biscaia E C, et al. Remediation of sandy soils using surfactant solutions and foams[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009,164(2/3):1325-1334.
[26]	何宇,郭超,付玉丰,等.胶态泡沫在饱和介质迁移特性及对PCE冲洗效果[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(11):4673-4680.He Y, Guo C, Fu Y F, et al. Migration characteristics of colloidal gas aphron in saturated media and flushing effect on PCE[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(11):4673-4680.
[27]	秦传玉,郭超,何宇.胶态微泡沫在非饱和多孔介质中的迁移规律及影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019,49(6):1732-1740.Qin C Y, Guo C, He Y, Migration characteristics of CGAs and the influencing factors in unsaturated porous media[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2019,49(6):1732-1740.