1961~2019年黄河流域大气自净能力指数变化特征分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3692 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要利用2015~2019年环境空气质量监测数据和黄河流域73个站点1961~2019年的气象观测资料，对11个站点的大气自净能力指数的适用性及其与环境空气质量之间的关联性进行了验证，并分析了黄河流域大气自净能力指数的时空变化特征及影响因子.结果表明，1961~2019年黄河流域大气自净能力指数整体呈下降趋势，下降速率为每10a下降0.18t/（d×km²），平均值为4.44t/（d×km²），且在1969年达到最大值，为5.32t/（d×km²），2011年达到最小值，为3.81t/（d×km²）；黄河流域73个站点中有64个站点大气自净能力指数呈下降趋势，50个站点呈显著和极显著下降趋势.从年内变化看出，黄河流域大气自净能力指数最高值出现在4月，为5.30t/（d×km²），最低值出现在1月，为3.48t/（d×km²）.在年空间分布上，黄河流域大气自净能力指数分布以青海西南部，山东、四川大部分地区，内蒙古、宁夏以及甘肃少部分地区，陕西西安，山西的五寨和右玉等大气自净能力较好，大气自净能力指数在4.69~7.18t/（d×km²），其余地区大气自净能力相对较差.影响因子中，混合层高度与大气自净能力指数呈极显著正相关，相关系数为0.63（n=4307）；小风日数与大气自净能力指数呈极显著负相关，相关系数为-0.78（n=4307），日平均风速³2.5m/s的日数及日平均风速³5.5m/s的日数与大气自净能力指数均呈极显著正相关，相关系数分别为0.78和0.55（n=4307）；降水日数与大气自净能力指数呈极显著正相关，相关系数为0.18（n=4307），中雨及以上日数与大气自净能力指数呈显著正相关，相关系数为0.03（n=4307），黄河流域小雨对大气自净能力的影响明显高于中雨.逐步回归分析显示，大气自净能力指数主要受日平均风速³2.5m/s的日数、降水日数和混合层高度的综合影响，其中，日平均风速³2.5m/s的日数对大气自净能力指数的贡献率最大，其贡献为正.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘美
	姬兴杰
	左璇
	丁亚磊
	朱业玉
	王超杰

关键词 ：大气自净能力指数, 混合层高度, 风速, 降水, PM_2.5

Abstract：Based on the ambient air quality monitoring data from 2015 to 2019 and the meteorological observation data from 73 stations in the Yellow River Basin from 1961 to 2019, the applicability of the atmospheric self-purification capacity index of 11 stations and its correlation with the ambient air quality were verified. The spatial and temporal variation characteristics and influencing factors of atmospheric self-purification capacity index in the Yellow River Basin were analyzed. The results showed that the whole Yellow River Basin presented a downward trend from 1961 to 2019, with a decreasing rate of 0.18t/(d×km²) per 10a, and the average value was 4.44t/(d×km²). The atmospheric self-purification ability index reached its highest value of 5.32t/(d×km²) in 1969, and reached its lowest value of 3.81t/(d×km²) in 2011. Among 73 sites in the Yellow River Basin, 64 sites showed a downward trend in atmospheric self-purification capacity index, and 50 sites showed a significant downward trend. According to the annual variation, the highest value of atmospheric self-purification capacity index in the Yellow River Basin was 5.30t/(d×km²) in April, and the lowest value was 3.48t/(d×km²) in January. In terms of annual spatial distribution, the atmospheric self-purification capacity index of the Yellow River Basin was between 4.69t/(d×km²) and 7.18t/(d×km²) in the southwest of Qinghai, most of Shandong and Sichuan, a small part of Inner Mongolia, Ningxia and Gansu, Xi'an of Shaanxi, Wuzhai and Youyu of Shanxi, etc., which had better atmospheric self-purification capacity. It was relatively poor in other regions. Among the impact factors, the mixing layer height was positively correlated with the self-purification capacity of the atmosphere, and the correlation coefficient was 0.63(n=4307). There was an extremely significant negative correlation between the number of light wind days and atmospheric self-purification ability index, with the correlation coefficient of -0.78(n=4307). The number of ³2.5m/s and ³5.5m/s days with daily average wind speed had extremely significant positive correlation with atmospheric self-purification capacity index, the correlation coefficients were 0.78and 0.55(n=4307), respectively. There was an extremely significant positive correlation between the number of rainy days (³0.1mm) and atmospheric self-purification capacity, and the correlation coefficient was 0.18(n=4307). The number of days with moderate rain (³10.0mm) and above were significantly positively correlated with atmospheric self-purification capacity, with a correlation coefficient of 0.03(n=4307). The effect of light rain on atmospheric self-purification capacity was obviously higher than that of moderate rain in the Yellow River Basin. Stepwise regression analysis showed that the index of atmospheric self-purification capacity was mainly affected by the number of days with daily average wind speed (³2.5m/s), the number of rainy days and the height of mixing layer. Among them, the number of days with daily average wind speed (³2.5m/s) had the largest contribution to the index, and its contribution was positive.

Key words： atmospheric self-purification capacity index mixed layer thickness wind velocity precipitation PM_2.5

收稿日期: 2021-05-12

PACS:

X51

基金资助:中国气象局河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点实验室应用技术研究基金项目（KZ202005）

通讯作者: 姬兴杰,正高级工程师,jixingjie2004@aliyun.com E-mail: jixingjie2004@aliyun.com

作者简介: 刘美(1997-),女,河南周口人,郑州大学硕士研究生,主要从事气候变化及其影响研究.发表论文2篇.

引用本文:

刘美, 姬兴杰, 左璇, 丁亚磊, 朱业玉, 王超杰. 1961~2019年黄河流域大气自净能力指数变化特征分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(12): 5591-5601. LIU Mei, JI Xing-jie, ZUO Xuan, DING Ya-lei, ZHU Ye-yu, WANG Chao-jie. Variation characteristics of atmospheric self-purification capacity index over the Yellow River Basin during 1961~2019. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2021, 41(12): 5591-5601.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V41/I12/5591

[1]	薛文博,付飞,王金南,等.基于全国城市PM2.5达标约束的大气环境容量模拟[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014,34(10):2490-2496. Xue W B, Fu F, Wang J N, et al. Modeling study on atmospheric environmental capacity of major pollutants constrained by PM2.5 compliance of Chinese cities[J]. China Environmental Science, 2014, 34(10):2490-2496.
[2]	徐大海,王郁,朱蓉.大气环境容量系数A值频率曲线拟合及其应用[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(10):2913-2922. Xu D H, Wang Y, Zhu R. The atmospheric environmental capacity coefficient cumulative frequency curve fitting and its application[J]. China Environmental Science, 2016,36(10):2913-2922.
[3]	徐大海,朱蓉.国家标准GB/T3840-91中城市大气污染物总量控制A-P值法的应用[J]. 城市环境与城市生态, 1993,6(2):36-41. Xu D H, Zhu R. Application of A-P value method for total control of urban air pollutants in National Standard GB/T3840-91[J]. Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 1993,6(2):36-41.
[4]	肖杨,毛显强,马根慧,等.基于ADMS和线性规划的区域大气环境容量测算[J]. 环境科学研究, 2008,21(3):13-16. Xiao Y, Mao X Q, Ma H G, et al. Atmospheric environmental capacity study based on ADMS model and linear programming[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2008,21(3):13-16.
[5]	钱跃东,王勤耕.针对大尺度区域的大气环境容量综合估算方法[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011,31(3):504-509. Qian Y D, Wang Q G. An integrated method of atmospheric environmental capacity estimation for large-scale region[J]. China Environmental Science, 2011,31(3):504-509.
[6]	杨清健,赵天良,郑小波,等.亚洲季风强弱年蒙自市大气环境容量差异估算[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(10):4054-4064. Yang Q J, Zhao T L, Zheng X B, et al. Assessments of the differences of atmospheric environmental capacity between strong and weak Asian monsoon years in Mengzi[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(10):4054-4064.
[7]	张稼轩,李博,王颖,等.河谷城市大气环境容量的研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020,33(4):801-808. Zhang J X, Li B, Wang Y, et al. Atmospheric environmental capacity in River Valley Terrain[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(4):801-808.
[8]	吴蓉,卢燕宇,王胜,等.1961~2010年安徽省大气环境容量系数变化特征分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2017,13(6):545-556. Wu R, Lu Y Y, Wang S, et al. Variation characteristics of the atmospheric environmental capacity coefficient in Anhui Province during 1961~2010[J]. Climate Change Research, 2017,13(6):545- 556.
[9]	于庚康,王博妮,陈鹏,等.2013年初江苏连续性雾－霾天气的特征分析[J]. 气象, 2015,41(5):622-629. Wang G k, Wang B N, Chen P, et al. Analysis of characteristic of a long-lasting fog-haze event in Jiangsu 2013[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2015,41(5):622-629.
[10]	Moreira D M, Tirabassi T, Carvalho J C. Plume dispersion simulation in low wind conditions in stable and convective boundary layers[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005,39(20):3643-3650.
[11]	Sharan M, Gopalakrishnan S G. Mathematical modeling of diffusion and transport of pollutants in the atmospheric boundary layer[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2003,160(1/2):357-394.
[12]	唐颖潇,韩素芹,蔡子颖,等.2013~2017年天津市大气自净能力与大气颗粒物质量浓度特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019,35(6): 55-66. Tang Y X, Han S Q, Cai Z Y, et al. Feature analysis of atmospheric self-purification capability and atmospheric particu-late concentration in Tianjin during 2013~2017[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019,35(6):55-66.
[13]	罗玉,陈超,张天宇,等.1981~2017年四川省大气自净能力变化特征分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021,41(2):527-536. Luo Y, Chen C, Zhang T Y, et al. Analysis on the characteristics of atmospheric self-cleaning ability index in Sichuan Province from 1981 to 2017[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(2):527-536.
[14]	张天宇,张丹,王勇,等.1951~2018年重庆主城区大气自净能力变化特征分析[J]. 高原气象, 2019,38(4):901-910. Zhang T Y, Zhang D, Wang Y, et al. Analysis of variation characteristics of atmospheric self-purification capability in the main urban area of Chongqing from 1951 to 2018[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2019,38(4):901-910.
[15]	朱红蕊,刘赫男,张洪玲,等.2008~2018年黑龙江省大气自净能力变化特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020,36(4):89-94. Zhu H R, Liu H N, Zhang H L, et al. Change characteristics of atmospheric self-purification capability in Heilongjiang province from 2008 to 2018[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(4):89-94.
[16]	Han Z Y, Zhou B T, Xu Y, et al. Projected changes in haze pollution potential in China: An ensemble of regional climate model simulations[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 2017,17(16):1-46.
[17]	刘新,刘林春,赵艳丽,等.呼和浩特市大气自净能力变化及其影响因素[J]. 干旱气象, 2020,38(4):632-638. Liu X, Liu L C, Zhao Y L, et al. Variation Characteristics of Atmosphere Self-cleaning Ability and Its Influencing Factors in Hohhot City[J]. Journal of Arid Meteor-ology, 2020,38(4):632-638.
[18]	GB/T 28591-2012 风力等级[S]. GB/T 28591-2012 Wind scale[S].
[19]	GB/T 28592-2012 降水量等级[S]. GB/T 28592-2012 Different levels of precipitation[S].
[20]	朱蓉,张存杰,梅梅.大气自净能力指数的气候特征与应用研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(10):3601-3610. Zhu R, Zhang C J, Mei M. The climate characteristics of atmospheric self-cleaning ability index and its application in China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(10):3601-3610.
[21]	GB 3095-2012 环境空气质量标准[S]. GB 3095-2012 Ambient air quality standard[S].
[22]	GB/T 13201-91 制定地方大气污染物排放标准的技术方法[S]. GB/T 13201-91 Technical methods for formulating local air pollutant emission standards[S].
[23]	张文静,胡琳,吴素良.降水对西安市大气污染物质量浓度影响分析[J]. 陕西气象, 2013,(1):18-21. Zhang W J, Hu L, Wu L S. Influence of precipitation on air pollutant concentration in Xi'an[J]. Shaanxi Meteorology, 2013,(1):18-21.